 |
Any news on the new Plustek 120 scanner? |
 |
01-02-2012
|
#1
|
|
Practitioner
Harry Lime is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Here and there
Posts: 1,525
|
Any news on the new Plustek 120 scanner?
Any news? Anyone? Bueller?
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#2
|
|
modern vintage
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,262
|
March product launch, no price yet...
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue
March product launch, no price yet...
|
Hey... How did you find that out?
|
|
|
|
07-02-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalintrigue
March product launch, no price yet...
|
Hmmm.. You forgot to mention the year.
|
|
|
|
07-02-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Aristophanes is online now
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 438
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwcolor
Hmmm.. You forgot to mention the year.
|
This is a Photokina year. Marquee product splash then.
|
|
|
|
07-03-2012
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
SixSeven is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 32
|
I think he was implying this thing has been "coming soon" for a while now.
|
|
|
|
07-09-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
SixSeven is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 32
|
Is this out yet??!!!
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,169
|
Any specs, or feature set available for release?
Is this a 9000ED replacement, or a larger format 7600?
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Matus is online now
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,804
|
I hope it will be a robust and well made machine rather than a cheap one. Otherwise there will soon be no decent low priced scans for 120 films soon (I can get scans at a lab made with the 9000 for about 1 Euro per 6x6 image and the quality is incomparable to flatbed scanners). We really need a good quality replacement for the 9000 even if the price will not allow each 120 shooter to get one. Of course - automatic film transport is a must if this scanner should be used by labs.
I am indeed curios ...
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#10
|
|
burn the box
Photon42 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 541
|
Is it going to be like this one?
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Photon42
Is it going to be like this one?
|
Nope. That is a Pacific Image scanner.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-02-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matus
I hope it will be a robust and well made machine rather than a cheap one. Otherwise there will soon be no decent low priced scans for 120 films soon (I can get scans at a lab made with the 9000 for about 1 Euro per 6x6 image and the quality is incomparable to flatbed scanners). We really need a good quality replacement for the 9000 even if the price will not allow each 120 shooter to get one. Of course - automatic film transport is a must if this scanner should be used by labs.
I am indeed curios ...
|
Here is what I can tell you at this point:
A lot of the input from members of this forum and the Leica form was taken into consideration by our product management team during the final stages of development. The product manager for the scanner is an avid photographer... FILM photographer that is. So I'm confident that the product is in good hands.
It is a scanner that is targeted to the pro and serious amateur. It is not a scanner targeted to the casual photographer. Cheap it won't be!
Stay tuned for more info!
|
|
|
|
 |
01-02-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 922
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdruziak
Here is what I can tell you at this point:
A lot of the input from members of this forum and the Leica form was taken into consideration by our product management team during the final stages of development. The product manager for the scanner is an avid photographer... FILM photographer that is. So I'm confident that the product is in good hands.
It is a scanner that is targeted to the pro and serious amateur. It is not a scanner targeted to the casual photographer. Cheap it won't be!
Stay tuned for more info!
|
Sounds very promising!
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#14
|
|
Ship Cadet
Jani_from_Finland is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Helsinki
Age: 34
Posts: 204
|
Any idea on what the pricerange will be ( 500-1000-1500-2000 $ / € / £ ) and will it be released in Europe also after the US release?
|
|
|
|
01-03-2012
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Jockos is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sweden
Age: 25
Posts: 430
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdruziak
It is a scanner that is targeted to the pro and serious amateur. It is not a scanner targeted to the casual photographer. Cheap it won't be!
|
Personally I think you're to late for that segment as the PI/Reflecta is already out, and appears to be working just fine. Unless you're planning to release a MF scanner with significantly higher resolution/dMax.
What I think the market want/need, is a non-flatbed MF scanner at a reasonable price.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2012
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jockos
Personally I think you're to late for that segment as the PI/Reflecta is already out, and appears to be working just fine. Unless you're planning to release a MF scanner with significantly higher resolution/dMax.
What I think the market want/need, is a non-flatbed MF scanner at a reasonable price.
|
Can anyone point me to some tests or images of the Pacific Image/Reflecta? There are some reviews on the B&H site, but some of the reviews are a little suspect.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-03-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Jamie123 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jockos
Personally I think you're to late for that segment as the PI/Reflecta is already out, and appears to be working just fine. Unless you're planning to release a MF scanner with significantly higher resolution/dMax.
What I think the market want/need, is a non-flatbed MF scanner at a reasonable price.
|
I think it's hard to argue that they're ''too late''. We're not talking iPhones here. I don't think anyone was queing for hours to be the first to get the Reflecta scanner. It's also not like their product is a novelty. Good scanners have been around for decades. Whether or not the Plustek sells will depend entirely on how well it performs and/or how it is priced in relation to the Reflecta.
Also, obviously every potential buyer would like this to be dirt cheap and perform like a Flextight X5. But that's just not going to happen. The market for film scanners is still somewhat limted so even if they priced it low they probably wouldn't make up for it in volume.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
01-03-2012
|
#18
|
|
Slightly Irregular
cabbiinc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jockos
Personally I think you're to late for that segment as the PI/Reflecta is already out, and appears to be working just fine. Unless you're planning to release a MF scanner with significantly higher resolution/dMax.
What I think the market want/need, is a non-flatbed MF scanner at a reasonable price.
|
I disagree. With medium and even large format cameras being sold by old pros or retirees or... the prices have become increasingly affordable. On the other hand, the megapixel race is in full swing and if you're looking at the next latest and greatest a mf scanner for roughly the same price that delivers far more in pixel count and dynamic range with the nostalgia of film means some people will be willing to spend some money on this stuff. Some people don't see any problem at all spending $200 on a phone with a 2 year, $2k total commitment so they can just turn around in 2 years and buy the next model and be in fashion. A scanner will pay for itself if you shoot enough.
|
|
|
|
 |
01-02-2012
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
stompyq is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 614
|
^ Are the epson flatbeds that bad? I can imagine for 35mm but 120 film?
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
benlees is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 41
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stompyq
^ Are the epson flatbeds that bad? I can imagine for 35mm but 120 film?
|
The Epsons are quite good. For versatility. From 35mm to 8x10- can't go wrong. I've had mine for years and it doesn't miss a beat but I don't use it for prints.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2012
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
thegman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Age: 33
Posts: 2,947
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stompyq
^ Are the epson flatbeds that bad? I can imagine for 35mm but 120 film?
|
Personally, I think if the V700 with 6x6 film is not good enough for you, then a full-frame professional DSLR won't be either. You've got to get the right kit though, the BetterScanning kit transforms the quality in my opinion. And whilst I've never used a Nikon 9000, and I'm sure it's great, some examples on the net don't seem too much different to a V700 used correctly.
Also, I think scanning at 6400dpi and downsampling to 3200dpi can make a difference. There is certainly a knack to it.
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
JeffL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 200
|
Mark, It's nice to have you contributing.
A quality medium format scanner on the market will be a good thing for us film shooters (and I hope for Plustek). I, like others, have a Nikon 8000 and cross my fingers every time I start it.
|
|
|
|
01-02-2012
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,392
|
I'm holding out on buying a scanner till I see this one...
|
|
|
|
01-03-2012
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
brbo is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 273
|
It's been posted on RFF before. Reflecta MF5000 test (german):
http://www.filmscanner.info/ReflectaMF5000.html
In short, a 'Nikon Coolscan 9000 killer' it is not. Fast, 3000dpi effective resolution, manual transport.
I'll bet many $$$ that Plustek will be VERY similar to Reflecta MF5000 (it's the same with Reflecta vs Plustek small format scanners).
|
|
|
|
01-03-2012
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
mdruziak is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brbo
It's been posted on RFF before. Reflecta MF5000 test (german):
http://www.filmscanner.info/ReflectaMF5000.html
In short, a 'Nikon Coolscan 9000 killer' it is not. Fast, 3000dpi effective resolution, manual transport.
I'll bet many $$$ that Plustek will be VERY similar to Reflecta MF5000 (it's the same with Reflecta vs Plustek small format scanners).
|
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Plustek doesn't relabel other manufacturers scanners. On the other hand, we do manufacture scanners for other vendors.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:28. |
|
|