Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Optics and Lenses -

Optics and Lenses - This forum is aimed towards the TECHNICAL side of photographic OPTICS and LENSES. There will be some overlap by camera/manufacturer, but this forum is for the heavy duty tech discussions. This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum. This is the forum to discuss optics or lenses in general, to learn about the tech behind the lenses and images. IF you have a question about a specific lens, post it in the forum about that type of camera, NOT HERE.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next

Old 07-05-2008   #11
Patman
Registered User
 
Patman's Avatar
 
Patman is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Camden, New York
Age: 72
Posts: 252
[quote=leicasniper;851156]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patman View Post
I've been using long lenses longer than you are years old and know quite well how to handle them but the Nikon auto focus sucks and the lens simply just doesn't perform."

Hmmm. Well, most of the professional images shot over the last 30 years have been shot with Nikons or Canons. Most of those sucky images in NatGeo magazine. Those many Pulitzer Prize images.

While I shoot Canons rather than Nikons professionally, I can assure you that both systems lenses "perform." I can afford to shoot anything I want to, and I actually own several Leicas and lenses, and I shoot Canon. Apparently most of us just aren't astute enough to know our cameras and lenses don't "perform."
I believe I read here that most professionals don't use Leica's because the glass is too expensive and most of the images you see posted are taken with long lenses on the Canon's and Nikons. Tell me how many 50 year old Canon and Nikon's are you using with 50 year old lenses trying too play catch up and how many of these cameras or lens have never been in for repair or adjustment. Prize winning photos are not picked for image quality but for the drama portraided in them and photos in printed media don't reflect image quality because offset printing just can't duplicate the quality of a photo print. I print my own images, did so with film and now digital, that is where I make the comparisome. PS. Good Night my friends, this old man is going to sleep.
__________________
Leica M8, Leica M3, DS, 21mm, f2.8 Biogon, 35mm Summaron, f3.5, 50mm Summicron f2, Col, 50mm Elmar, f3.5, Col, 90mm Elmar, f4, Col, 135mm Hector f3.5, 135 Elmarit, f2.8 w/eyes, M & MR Meter
Bessa T 101 w/50mm Heliar
Ansco Regent, Agfa Apotar 50mm, 3.5

Kodak 260, Olympus E20N, Leica R8, Kodak DCS Pro 14n, Nikon D200

Last edited by Patman : 07-05-2008 at 19:36.
  Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:42.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.