B&W Film Selection--indoor bike race
Old 09-13-2012   #1
gkt
Registered User
 
gkt is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 5
B&W Film Selection--indoor bike race

Back again with another film choice question.

I'm doing a couple races at two velodromes...one in LA and one in Manchester, UK. If I recall, the track in Manchester has tungsten lights.

Thinking of taking my M6 and getting some B&W shots in the infield. Any recommendations on film speed and filters? I'm a complete newbie with film...trying to rid myself of pixels.

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #2
Puggie
Registered User
 
Puggie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Fareham, UK
Posts: 36
I'd run with a traditional 400iso film , prob Tri-x or HP5+, when you get there you can decide to shoot it at upto 1600ISO (or higher if you fancy the risk) if you need the speed and they develop it appropriately.

I probably wouldn't worry about any filters, you will probably need all the light you can get!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #3
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
 
Chriscrawfordphoto's Avatar
 
Chriscrawfordphoto is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Age: 37
Posts: 5,930
Ilford Delta 3200. Magnificent film for low light.
__________________
Christopher Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana

Back home again in Indiana

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com

My Technical Info pages: Film Developing times, scanning, printing, editing.

Like My Work on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #4
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chriscrawfordphoto View Post
Ilford Delta 3200. Magnificent film for low light.
Absolutely. Far better than pushed 400.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #5
Timmyjoe
Registered User
 
Timmyjoe's Avatar
 
Timmyjoe is online now
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 408
Never liked the results I got with Delta 3200. Could be just me.

Would go with a 400. Used to shoot Velodrome racing decades ago, though it was outdoor tracks. Very harsh lighting, very overhead harsh lighting, lots of raccoon eyes unless you use some kind of fill flash or bounce card to get light from below.

The lower contrast lenses you can use, and the lower contrast processing you can use, the better.

Good luck and have fun.

Best,
-Tim
__________________
View From Here
a progressive photo blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #6
Mcary
Registered User
 
Mcary is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Virginia USA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,190
Its a bit pricy but think the key to using Delta 3200 is processing it in DD-X, rather then a traditional developer such as D-76 or XTOL. I've not processed its in TMAX developer so can't offer an opinion.
__________________
Mike Cary
Glorified button pusher
Tumblr http://www.tumblr.com/blog/mcaryartnude
Not work safe
Leica M8
28mm F 2.8 Elmarit
75mm F 2.5 Color Heliar
Fuji X100
Epson V700
Crown Graphic+ 135mm lens

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #7
BobYIL
Registered User
 
BobYIL's Avatar
 
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,314
In very cloudy weathers or even toward twilight hours I used to shoot 400ASA B&W rated at 800 for motocross races, generally more demanding than biking.. If you pan your camera along action then you can get acceptably sharp results down to 1/60 with fine details.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #8
gkt
Registered User
 
gkt is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 5
Thanks all! I appreciate your advice and will let you know how it goes
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2012   #9
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
 
Chriscrawfordphoto's Avatar
 
Chriscrawfordphoto is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Age: 37
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mcary View Post
Its a bit pricy but think the key to using Delta 3200 is processing it in DD-X, rather then a traditional developer such as D-76 or XTOL. I've not processed its in TMAX developer so can't offer an opinion.
Tmax Developer is what I use since the Ilford stuff isn't sold where I live. It works beautifully. I think Tmax Developer and DD-X are supposed to be similar to each other, and I agree with you on D-76...terrible.
__________________
Christopher Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana

Back home again in Indiana

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com

My Technical Info pages: Film Developing times, scanning, printing, editing.

Like My Work on Facebook
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:05.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.