Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 09-20-2012   #26
zvos1
Registered User
 
zvos1's Avatar
 
zvos1 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 273
I am happy with my M8. I shoot only B&W with it and the files clean up nicely in LR4 even at ISO1250. I didn't even bother with the IR cut filters. I think your lens choices are important for M8, my elmarit 28mm 2.8 is a perfect fit and it stays on the camera 90% of the time.
If I want all the bells and whistles on new M, I'll just use a DSLR. I also use nex 5n which compliments M8 nicely.
__________________
Of course it's all luck. - HCB

M3 + 50 cron IV
M6 + 28 elmarit IV
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #27
Vince Lupo
Registered User
 
Vince Lupo's Avatar
 
Vince Lupo is online now
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Baltimore, Maryland USA
Posts: 2,372
I never considered an M8, as the crop factor would have driven me nuts. I bought the M9 a bit more than two years ago, and have discovered that I'm primarily using it for b+w work. The Monochrom seems like the perfect camera for my personal needs, while the newly introduced M seems a bit much in terms of bells and whistles (particularly that I just got a D4!). Do I have any regrets at all for having purchased the M9 now that I'm likely to sell it in favour of the Monochrom? Of course not -- I'd likely not have gotten the photos that I've gotten with it had I been using some other camera.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #28
maggieo
More Deadly
 
maggieo's Avatar
 
maggieo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 1,955
I'd love a Momochrom, but my M8 is showing its age (or mileage) and the M9 or M9-P is looking pretty good right now, especially at their new, discounted (by Leica standards) prices.
__________________
My Flickr Photostream & My Photo Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #29
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
 
Calzone's Avatar
 
Calzone is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: El Barrio
Age: 55
Posts: 3,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by maggieo View Post
I'd love a Momochrom, but my M8 is showing its age (or mileage) and the M9 or M9-P is looking pretty good right now, especially at their new, discounted (by Leica standards) prices.
Good to hear that you got a lot of use out of your M8. Perhaps you still have the option of holding out for the Monochrom if that's the best camera that best suits you, since you still have the M8.

Also nothing wrong with taking advantage of the deals on M9's and M9P's.

Cal
__________________
"Vintage Hipster"
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #30
maggieo
More Deadly
 
maggieo's Avatar
 
maggieo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 1,955
I've ridden my M8 pretty hard for the last five years and it's done right by me all this time, tho' the dreaded vertical line is now starting to creep into under-exposed ISO 320 shots now and then.

I reckon it's time for an upgrade, since an out of warranty repair would be nearly $2000.
__________________
My Flickr Photostream & My Photo Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #31
froyd
Registered User
 
froyd's Avatar
 
froyd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by maggieo View Post
I've ridden my M8 pretty hard for the last five years and it's done right by me all this time, tho' the dreaded vertical line is now starting to creep into under-exposed ISO 320 shots now and then.

I reckon it's time for an upgrade, since an out of warranty repair would be nearly $2000
.
It's comments like these that always make me snatch my hand back every time I reach out. Dante's camera in the classifieds --for instance-- is mighty tempting, but if reliability ever becomes an issue, I don't know I'd be able to afford the repairs.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #32
maggieo
More Deadly
 
maggieo's Avatar
 
maggieo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 1,955
To be fair to Leica, many vertical line repairs have been done for no to little cost to the owner. I just haven't tried my luck yet, if at all.
__________________
My Flickr Photostream & My Photo Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #33
Fraser
Registered User
 
Fraser is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 617
As much as I liked my M8 and sometimes consider buying one again, in my opinion the M9 is a big jump in image quality especially shooting raw. High iso is fine and quite usable at 1600iso I'm not really sure why people complain about it. My slowest lens is f2 which is a stop quicker than all my DSLR lenses so thats like shooting 3200iso. Maybe I will upgrade my M9 one day but I'm quite happy with it and feel like keeping it until it gets nice and brassy!
So yes I'm glad I changed from M8 to M9 (even though I sometimes wish I kept the M8! to use with my M9).
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #34
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Love Film View Post
You will be startled at how much more often you will want to pick up the M9 and use it as opposed to the M8.

The M8 was really a beta product, a stopgap not ready for prime time. The M9 is a mature camera with very few flaws.

I am being practical about it. I can buy a used M9 but I cannot buy a used digital M. Therefore, I bought the M9. I am really doing this to gradually transition to digital.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #35
Kingsfan
Registered User
 
Kingsfan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 65
i only held off on the M9 because of the cost. if cost was not an issue i'd be getting a Monocrom over an M.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #36
Nicolai
Registered User
 
Nicolai's Avatar
 
Nicolai is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 92
I am happy with my M8 and will not upgrade to a m9 in the nearest time. But I must say that it is a bit tempting to do so.

What is going to happen with the prices on the M8? Are they going to drop as much as the m9?
__________________
Nicolai

RFF gallery

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #37
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
I think that $1500 will be the price of a used M8 and that $3500-$4000 will be the price of an M9 within the next three months.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #38
semordnilap
Registered User
 
semordnilap's Avatar
 
semordnilap is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 679
It's an interesting question... I've taken thousands of frames on my M8 since I bought it in 2007, and it's been just a super camera for me. The M is tempting, largely because of, as mentioned by others, potentially better high-iso capability. Plus I like the usability of that rear thumbwheel, and that it has other metering options, at least in live-view, and better processing.

But I'm an rf shooter, so it is tempting to find a discounted M9 and just go with that, as an M is just a lot of money. So we will see... but I am with those who are worried about their M8's long term viability. So for now it's save and see what the future brings.
__________________
________________
______________
____________
__________
________
______

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #39
Tim Gray
Registered User
 
Tim Gray is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,830
I've waited. Never bought a digital M in the first place. The M9 was interesting to me, but the ISO performance and the issues with many wide angle lenses put me off - way too much money for me for a camera with those issues.

The Monochrom and the new M both appeal to me. I've been saving since 9/9/09 so I can actually afford one of them now. I'll wait and see how the new M turns out and then make a choice.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #40
hausen
Hausen
 
hausen is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Auckland
Posts: 700
I really didn't like my M8, love my M9 and am already on this list for the new M. Reason for me is simple all of things I dislike about M9 have been resolved and if I ever need an SLR the M9 can effectively transform into that with the accessories and then revert back to lean RF camera when not required. Match made in heaven for me.
__________________
David
Auckland, NZ

Far too many cameras & lenses!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #41
robklurfield
eclipse
 
robklurfield's Avatar
 
robklurfield is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 15,002
Find some for me, too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damaso View Post
I am glad I waited. Now I just need to find the money to buy one!
__________________
rob klurfield
http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertklurfield

blog: http://hemi-sphericalaberration.blogspot.com/

google +: gplus.to/robklurfield

"I'm sure it wouldn't interest anybody
outside of a small circle of friends." - Phil Ochs

"His photos are saturated with obviousness, mental inertia, clichés and bad jokes." -http://www.500letters.org/form_15.php



I point. I shoot. sometimes, I focus first.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #42
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,229
Why wait when you can use what is available. Things progress so rapidly now that the day you unbox your new Leica M, it will be on the decline.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #43
LTN
Registered User
 
LTN is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Love Film View Post
You'll be dead soon, buy what you want and enjoy it before you kick the bucket and the government or greedy relatives take everything you worked so hard for, and they sell your best stuff for fifty cents or throw your cameras in the garbage.

I've heard it said, "my greatest fear is that after I die my wife will sell my stuff for what I told her I paid for it!"
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #44
Ben Z
Registered User
 
Ben Z is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbg32 View Post
Why wait when you can use what is available. Things progress so rapidly now that the day you unbox your new Leica M, it will be on the decline.
All my experience with Leicas has taught me I don't want to ever be an early-adopter. I may very well get an M, but not till its been out at least a year.
__________________
MY GALLERY
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #45
LTN
Registered User
 
LTN is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by zvos1 View Post
I am happy with my M8. I shoot only B&W with it and the files clean up nicely in LR4 even at ISO1250. I didn't even bother with the IR cut filters. I think your lens choices are important for M8, my elmarit 28mm 2.8 is a perfect fit and it stays on the camera 90% of the time.
If I want all the bells and whistles on new M, I'll just use a DSLR. I also use nex 5n which compliments M8 nicely.
Indeed! I also have the M3, M6 and same lenses. Just purchased an M8 that was recently gone through by Leica. Looking forward to using the 28 2.8 on that M8! Of course I will carry a film camera as well. But I also have the Canon 5D MkII so if I REALLY need image quality - landscapes, etc. I will bring the DSLR along. But my day-to-day shooting really matches well with rangefinders, so that is what will be in my bag.

And, like many of you, I will be very interested to see what happens with prices but I will be surprised if they drop significantly. I think we will find the ME a bit of a compromise keeping the M9 prices up. I had a chance to handle/shoot a MONOCHROM this past weekend, and that is the camera I will be saving for!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2012   #46
Nicolai
Registered User
 
Nicolai's Avatar
 
Nicolai is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
I think that $1500 will be the price of a used M8 and that $3500-$4000 will be the price of an M9 within the next three months.
Well, that is just what I paid for mine so I can live with that.

Nicolai
__________________
Nicolai

RFF gallery

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-21-2012   #47
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
I think that $1500 will be the price of a used M8 and that $3500-$4000 will be the price of an M9 within the next three months.
I agree. Some M9s have already sold for $4000 on ebay.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-21-2012   #48
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
No matter how good a digital camera is, its price will drop significantly year after yeat. When we pay $4000 for a camera, plan on a $500 depreciation per year, or even more. Think of it as the cost of leasing a camera, and we pay $500-1000 to use the camera for one year. We better use the cameta a lot.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-21-2012   #49
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,941
I think of it as the same price as film and developing would be if I was using it during that time raid.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-21-2012   #50
EdwardKaraa
Registered User
 
EdwardKaraa's Avatar
 
EdwardKaraa is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bangkok
Age: 44
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
I think of it as the same price as film and developing would be if I was using it during that time raid.
I calculate the same way. Each frame about 1/3 $, that's what I pay here in Bangkok for Provia+processing. After a few thousand frames, the camera is free. Any price I get for it is pure profit
__________________
M9 ZM 25/2.8 35/2 50/2 85/2
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:04.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.