Epson R2400 vs Epson Stylus 1400

[CameraQuest]

I have an old R2400 printer and found a very attractive price on the Epson Styus 1400 printer.

Size of prints aside,

will the newer 1400 with presumably improved inks likely give my noticeably better prints?


Thanks,
Stephen

[Gerry M]

Maybe, if you only print color. I use R1800 for color and R2400 with QTR for b&w.

[Range-rover]

I had that printer, and the cartridge's size are small and they run out pretty fast, I
think your 2400 is a good printer, the ink's are about $18.00 dollars too for the 1400 so that's
a factor why I got rid of mine and I didn't see that much difference between that and my
Canon i9900 I have now.

Range

[Bob Michaels]

Stephen: I have used Epson 2400's for about 6 years now. I look at the output of the newer models and just cannot see any difference in the output. I honestly do not think Epson has made any technological improvements since the 2400. I cannot even see what "vivid magenta" does.

When I bought my most recent 2400, the 2800 had been released. Actually, I paid just a little more for that 2400 than I would have paid for a 2800. But I had 2400 inks and knew how it worked.

I have never owned or used a 1400. I imagine the color is fine. But I know they lack the LLK, LK & K combination and the ABW print driver. Everyone says they do not do b&w anywhere near the level of the 2400.

[lewis44]

I have never owned or used a 1400. I imagine the color is fine. But I know they lack the LLK, LK & K combination and the ABW print driver. Everyone says they do not do b&w anywhere near the level of the 2400.

I second this. Great B&W

[Robert1234]

I also have used Epson R2400 and found that it works in a good manner.

[whitecat]

I get really good BW prints from my 2400. The only complaint is the cost of inks. Over $100.00 for a full set.