Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Leica M -- Minolta CLE

Leica M -- Minolta CLE Minolta's electronic successor to the Leica / Minolta CL.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 06-09-2012   #26
beans22
Registered User
 
beans22 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
I just purchased a clean example of this lens and am anxiously awaiting shipment. the glass is pristine according to the seller and from the look of the images of the lens glass he provided, with no white spots or haze. Should i be worried that it will eventually develop white spots over time? is there anything that can be done to prevent this from happening?

Last edited by beans22 : 06-09-2012 at 02:52. Reason: grammar clarity edit
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-09-2012   #27
sleepyhead
Registered User
 
sleepyhead's Avatar
 
sleepyhead is online now
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,376
I read somewhere that the formation of the spots may be caused or accelerated by heat.

My example of the lens is also pristine, but I decided to just use it and enjoy it and not worry too much about it. But, I don't live in a warm part of the world.
__________________
__________________
Yaron
Still shooting film with a bunch of rangefinders and the odd SLR
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-09-2012   #28
astro8
Registered User
 
astro8's Avatar
 
astro8 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 50
Posts: 801
Probably not much you can do to prevent the spots or haze other than put it in a dry box and never use it...
__________________
-Greg

My RFF Gallery

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2012   #29
micromoogman
Registered User
 
micromoogman's Avatar
 
micromoogman is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by astro8 View Post
I just now opened up, cut the front element out and cleaned the haze out of my 28 M-Rokkor. It was useless the way it was...although the procedure is not for the faint of heart!

before and after surgery

Could you in detail describe how you did? Any pictures from the surgery?
What kind of solvent did you use?

Thanks J
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-01-2012   #30
IEDEI
Registered User
 
IEDEI's Avatar
 
IEDEI is offline
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 192
i was thinking of buying this lens....but am honestly not finding it worth the trouble with all these stories of white spots, haze, etc......especially with so many other non-issue lenses around!
__________________
M5
M8.1

500px/IEDEI
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-01-2012   #31
krötenblender
Registered User
 
krötenblender's Avatar
 
krötenblender is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by IEDEI View Post
i was thinking of buying this lens....but am honestly not finding it worth the trouble with all these stories of white spots, haze, etc......especially with so many other non-issue lenses around!
Well, then don't buy it...

I had mine fixed, after I got it with a complete Minolta CLE-Set. I opened a separate thread about it with before/after-photos (see post 11 in this thread). I did not see great improvement after the white spots where removed, because the lens was already good before.

OTOH I'm not a regular 28mm-shooter, but with the Rokkor, I don't really need another 28mm. It really is a nice lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-01-2012   #32
sleepyhead
Registered User
 
sleepyhead's Avatar
 
sleepyhead is online now
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by IEDEI View Post
i was thinking of buying this lens....but am honestly not finding it worth the trouble with all these stories of white spots, haze, etc......especially with so many other non-issue lenses around!

I partly agree with you, except last year I found one without spots for about 450 euros. Not cheap but not too bad either. And I gotta say it is my favorite 28mm lens (I also own the 28mm Summicron, and had the CV 28/1.9 and CV 28/2.0 before).

The 28mm M-Rokkor simply has a lovely mix of sharpness, medium contrast, good bokeh, and small size. And not expensive compared to my Summicron.

Last year I did a side-by-side comparison for my own curiousity between the rokkor and the summicron, and the results surprised me alot. The rokkor held it's own sharpness-wise, vignetted less, and actually has more pleasing bokeh (to me) than the Summicron.

So I guess this is why people put the effort into cleaning thes lenses up.

Once I can afford a camera such as the Sony NEX-6, it with the 28mm Rokkor will be my main take everywhere, all-around combo.
__________________
__________________
Yaron
Still shooting film with a bunch of rangefinders and the odd SLR
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2012   #33
krötenblender
Registered User
 
krötenblender's Avatar
 
krötenblender is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 388
Recently I have seen some of them on ebay, and all of them were sold for less than 200 Euros - I guess, for some reason it gets bad reputation these days. Even if you send it in to fix the white spots you can get one for much less than 400 Euros, which is a bargain for such a good lens.

The few shots I did with it this summer on a M9 and Zeiss Ikon turned out very beautiful, although wide open it has heavy vignetting. But I liked that.

For some years it was my main lens on the R-D1.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:33.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.