 |
The full frame or the crop |
 |
05-07-2012
|
#1
|
|
Not very good...
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 421
|
The full frame or the crop
Sorry for this, just a question really? Which one do people prefer? The full or the crop? I prefer the crop at present but some advice/discussion/critique would be great.
Full
TP Film meet 2 APX100 thru M6-35.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
Crop
TP Film meet 2 APX100 thru M6-35-2.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 62
Posts: 16,120
|
the crop, and i'd crop some asphalt, right up to the bottom of the curb to make her bigger ...
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.
" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#3
|
|
Not very good...
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 421
|
Thanks Paul, will give it a go!
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#4
|
|
camera hunter & gatherer
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,827
|
I would think the crop. I would go further than Paul and suggest cropping down to about the height of the fence. That would even make her loom larger yet and still convey the background with less distraction. That is just me though.
Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
robbeiflex is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 745
|
I prefer the crop in this case, as it cuts out a few needless objects around the periphery that draw my eyes away from the subject.
Cheers,
Rob
__________________
M6 and various lenses, Rolleiflex 2.8C, Rollei 35S
My Flickr
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,204
|
Try a square crop, with the woman on the left third of the frame.
__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
BobYIL is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,314
|
Full... it's more "complete".. and there is nothing to bother my eyes in the frame, why crop? Also the poster of the lady there is a complementary element..
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#8
|
|
Personal Photography
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,652
|
I have to go against the grain here.
The full frame has more point of interest that is missing in the crop.
I say full frame, print it big and hang it proudly on your wall 
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
huntjump is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 980
|
hmmm. I might suggest cropping on the left side just up until the pole is gone. Then crop a bit above down to the top of the board where the warhol-like posters loom (like you did), but leave more on the right side. Or, leave in the pole but try cropping a tad bit of the bottom road to preserve the wide shot. Hard to say, but if its between the two above I liked the full for some reason.
Edit: didnt like the pole at first, but it might be the reason i'm not liking the crop. hah
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Fawley is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 451
|
Full Frame. For me the woman is not the subject. The street scene is the subject. The woman and the wall are complimentary and you need most of the pavement to balance the wall.
|
|
|
|
05-07-2012
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
curmudgeon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 37
|
I would not crop it much, if at all. In particular, I would keep the dark post on the left to balance the darkness of the woman's upper garment.
What I would do, however, is apply a horizontal correction* so the curb line and the top of the dark frame are parallel with the edges of the the image. Oblique angles are fine, but this one is close enough to head on that I find the slight angles distracting.
* in the darkroom I would tilt the printing easel. In Lightroom I would use the horizontal correction.
|
|
|
|
05-08-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Jubb Jubb is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 508
|
another one for full frame.
|
|
|
|
05-08-2012
|
#13
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,898
|
... the crop is the better image. The road markings, kerb-edge and bollard take the eye over to the left and makes a feature of the light L shaped area of sky at the top LH corner ... which is of course distracting from the intended subject ... the crop avoids a lot of the problems, but if I had to use that image I'd probably crop closer and do a bit of work on the contrast too
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
flickr stuff
|
|
|
|
05-08-2012
|
#14
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,898
|
... like this ... I hope you don't mind me messing with it

__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
flickr stuff
|
|
|
|
05-08-2012
|
#15
|
|
Not very good...
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 421
|
Thanks all. I ran out of steam last night and so didn't get back to this! I will try various crops as suggested to see which pleases my eye most. I will print out a few as well (inkjet unfortunately) and see what works off the screen as well!
|
|
|
|
05-08-2012
|
#16
|
|
Not very good...
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 421
|
I don't mind at all. Its more striking with the contrast upped but loses some of the subtlety. More food for thought!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
... like this ... I hope you don't mind me messing with it

|
|
|
|
|
05-11-2012
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,354
|
I find the full frame more interesting as apparently you mind/eye did when you snapped this. The upper left is a little bright and maybe should be burned in. I like the entire scene. As mentioned above, the subject is the enture street scene. I also believe by going full frame, you reduce the notice of the blur on the woman's face and hand. It's not bad, but the closer you get, the more I find it distracting. I really like including the posters and the art work on the walls. Great stuff.
Just my two cents. It's your photo, do it how you like it best.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
05-11-2012
|
#20
|
|
My Red Dot Glows For You
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 10,105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
... like this ... I hope you don't mind me messing with it

|
Yes, that is much much better.
__________________
Big wig wisdom: "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" --Harry Warner, of Warner Bros., 1927
Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).
My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
|
|
|
|
05-11-2012
|
#21
|
|
Not very good...
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 421
|
Thanks all. The process itself of getting to the edit was fun in itself and don't worry, the original is not neglected either, I still like that too for its "wholeness".
|
|
|
|
 |
Many good images here. |
 |
05-11-2012
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
kuzano is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,653
|
Many good images here.
The reality for me is that your first crop took out the most distractions in the photo. The patch of sky in the upper corner served no purpose whatsoever, unless you were aiming for distraction in the first place. Second, losing the short post worked a wonder on the left side.
Otherwise there are good arguments for every other crop shown on this thread, EXCEPT any that would affect the posters across above the lady. If I knew they were there and you cropped them the whole image would lose the most impactfull portion shown.
|
|
|
|
05-12-2012
|
#23
|
|
Not very good...
menthel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raynes Park, London, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 421
|
Thanks, the iterative process is rather interesting and fun and is also not one I go through too often.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44. |
|
|