Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Optics and Lenses -

Optics and Lenses - This forum is aimed towards the TECHNICAL side of photographic OPTICS and LENSES. There will be some overlap by camera/manufacturer, but this forum is for the heavy duty tech discussions. This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum. This is the forum to discuss optics or lenses in general, to learn about the tech behind the lenses and images. IF you have a question about a specific lens, post it in the forum about that type of camera, NOT HERE.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Xenon, Leitz and Schneider
Old 07-03-2008   #1
radiocemetery
Registered User
 
radiocemetery's Avatar
 
radiocemetery is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central Illinois on the prairie
Posts: 382
Xenon, Leitz and Schneider

Hello lens historians,

I have been trying to find info. about the Xenon lens. Dante Stella says that Leitz obtained the rights to produce the Xenon. Does anyone know if this was the Schneider designed Xenon? I assumed it was the same because the name was the same.

I have a Schneider Xenon on a Certo Dollina. It is an f2 5cm. lens. This must have been fast glass in 1937. I need to fabricate a focus knob before I can try this camera, and I am anxious to see what the lens can do.

Thanks for any information.

Steve
__________________
FUBAR Leica IIIb
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2008   #2
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,140
Taylor Taylor Hobson also had a hand in the Xenon design.

http://homepage.mac.com/fwstutterhei...-08/00195.html
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2008   #3
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,288
If you scroll a bit down here

http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Biotar_en.html

You will find some more technical information on 50/2 (6 elements) and 50/1.5 (7 elements) Xenon/TTH and Summarit lenses.

The original Xenon design is from Tronnier (1925). TTH patented an early 50/1.5 design and had
to be mentioned on early Leitz lenses.

Best,

Roland.

Last edited by ferider : 07-03-2008 at 16:51.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2008   #4
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
Brian Sweeney said one time that the Canon 50/1.4 is a [only] true Xenon design lens.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2008   #5
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,288
That is correct, when comparing the Canon 50/1.4 (6 element) design to the original 50/2 Xenon.

Roland.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2008   #6
radiocemetery
Registered User
 
radiocemetery's Avatar
 
radiocemetery is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central Illinois on the prairie
Posts: 382
Thanks for the responses. I get more satisfaction using the older equipment when I know some of the history behind it.
__________________
FUBAR Leica IIIb
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2008   #7
chippy
foo was here
 
chippy's Avatar
 
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by radiocemetery View Post
Hello lens historians,

I have been trying to find info. about the Xenon lens. Dante Stella says that Leitz obtained the rights to produce the Xenon. Does anyone know if this was the Schneider designed Xenon? I assumed it was the same because the name was the same.

I have a Schneider Xenon on a Certo Dollina. It is an f2 5cm. lens. This must have been fast glass in 1937. I need to fabricate a focus knob before I can try this camera, and I am anxious to see what the lens can do.

Thanks for any information.

Steve
Steve if its a Xenon then its a Schneider-thats their trade name. i wasnt aware that leitz made it under licence? sounds interesting!

but of course as others mention, other lenses of simular make up are made under different makers names. yes the f2 xenon was a fast lens and usually offered as a top of the range lens for makers such as Certo, Welta and others, in its day was more expensive than a Leitz Elmar if offered on the same camera (so apple for apples so to speak). 6 element 4 group v 4 element in 3 groups for the elmar/tessar type.

the xenon is dirived from the double-gauss lens.

so to explain simply Paul Rudolph in 1896 began working with the symmetrical double-guass type lens and after a while came up with the f4.5 Planar lens (which was a symetrical lens; 3 elements the same size and shape as the 3 elements on the other side of the stop/aperature)

in 1920 quite some years later than the Planar but working from that; Horace Lee from the Taylor&T-Hobson company developed the Opic (name of lens) which increased the aperature to f2 by basically increasing the crown (front element) and reducing the diamature of the rear 3 elemnets and thus making the original symmetrical double- guass lens unsymmetrical. it wasnt unsuccesful but Ludwig Bertele of the great Ernemann cameras in 1923 developed the f2 Ernostar which was outstanding and sold better. the Ernostar if you have seen them are amazing, the front glass is the size of a Buicks headlight; basically derived from a triplet with an extra meniscus lens but on vast amounts of steroids-they look great!

working from what H.Lee had started and seeing its beifits, other lens makers worked on their own designs and in 1925 Tronnier designed the f2 Xenon for Schneider. 1927 Merte' from Ziess developed the Biotar and in 1933 Berek designed the Summar lens for Leitz. they are all slightly different (shape and diamature of rear elements for intance) to each other but at first glace have the same basic layout.

you will enjoy (all things being well) the results with the xenon..a great pre-war lens i think. about the top of the range for a pro or prosumer camera pre-war of the top of my head. often difficult to get any of these types of lenses now without some cleaning marks etc as the glass on the front element is of a type that scratches easy but still give good results.

Last edited by chippy : 07-03-2008 at 22:46.
  Reply With Quote

ernostar not gauss type
Old 07-04-2008   #8
kubilai
Registered User
 
kubilai is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 143
ernostar not gauss type

(IMHO)

Ernostar is not a double-gauss type, but a triplet evolution : one element added in the front part (Charles C. Minor) and improved in 1919 by Ludwig Bertele (he was 19 years old) .

Merte's Biotar belongs to Petzval's family

Last edited by kubilai : 07-04-2008 at 05:26. Reason: style...
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-04-2008   #9
chippy
foo was here
 
chippy's Avatar
 
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by kubilai View Post
(IMHO)

Ernostar is not a double-gauss type, but a triplet evolution : one element added in the front part (Charles C. Minor) and improved in 1919 by Ludwig Bertele (he was 19 years old) .

Merte's Biotar belongs to Petzval's family
didnt say it was a double-guass! just said
Quote:
basically derived from a triplet with an extra meniscus lens
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:06.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.