Rangefinderforum.com

Rangefinderforum.com (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Zeiss Contax (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   A curious "Contax-II" in auction (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=164399)

Elmar Lang 03-08-2018 02:19

A curious "Contax-II" in auction
 
Hello,

on the coming Saturday, Westlicht (Vienna), will take its usual, beautiful auction of vintage and historical cameras.

Looking at the pages with the RF Contax cameras, I've noticed lot no. 309, titled as "Contax II special", with the following description:

"Unengraved body, no serial number on shoe or inside, in very good condition, late winding knob, sync post on front, with uncoated Sonnar 2/5cm no.2273209, possibly made for field testing purposes without revealing the brand name".

Where "unengraved" means no "Contax" logo, or serial number on the accessory-shoe.

The position of the flash synch, made me more curious, so I've better checked the fine pictures completing the description: the removable back, immediately reveals that it's the one of a Kiev-4/4A.
More, the rewind-knob, although being a Contax-type one, is fixed with a screw not consistent with those used on a Contax; the focusing-wheel, is of Kiev-type and the leather cover, is typical of the Kievs made in the late 60s.

Here: http://www.auction2000.se/auk/w.Mega...inO=309&inSO=1 the pictures can be seen.

In other words, I think that this camera is a "No-Name Kiev", possibly "upgraded" with an unnumbered, Contax accessory shoe, a Contax, rewind knob and an uncoated, collapsible Zeiss Jena Sonnar 50/2; all easy to cannibalize from a unrepairable Contax-II.

I am surprised, because Westlicht's descriptions are usually very well, and accurately done.

This is why I'd be glad to read the opinion of the Contax-experts in this room.

Best wishes,

E.L.

xayraa33 03-08-2018 02:34

Flash sync contact is a dead give-away that the camera is a Kiev.

Would not a real Contax II have a logo embossed on the back door leather ?

Mr_Flibble 03-08-2018 03:58

The focus wheel is another clue

Elmar Lang 03-08-2018 06:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by xayraa33 (Post 2794485)
(...)Would not a real Contax II have a logo embossed on the back door leather ?

Perhaps another thing that persuaded the author of the catalogue description, to write: " (...)possibly made for field testing purposes without revealing the brand name." ...

KoNickon 03-08-2018 09:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elmar Lang (Post 2794525)
Perhaps another thing that persuaded the author of the catalogue description, to write: " (...)possibly made for field testing purposes without revealing the brand name." ...

But it's still listed as a Contax II. I'd say Westlicht has some further evidence to provide that this is a Contax.

Sumarongi 03-08-2018 09:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by KoNickon (Post 2794548)
But it's still listed as a Contax II. I'd say Westlicht has some further evidence to provide that this is a Contax.

*If you have any questions regarding a particular lot, please contact us*, they write:
Quote:

+43 (0)1 523 56 59 - 0
Bei Fragen zu einzelnen Losen, können Sie uns jederzeit kontaktieren.
Wir helfen auch gerne, Ihre Gebote zu registrieren.

Peter Coeln und Team
www.westlicht-auction.com
[email protected]

Chuffed Cheese 03-08-2018 10:15

Contact 'em.

Elmar Lang 03-09-2018 00:04

I will contact them.

They usually reply with excellent information and detail.

Chuffed Cheese 03-09-2018 01:15

Yeah, they would probably appreciate the concerns you present. An auction house relies on reputation.

Mr_Flibble 03-09-2018 01:29

Except Catawiki, they don't care as long as they make money from both the seller and the buyer...

Elmar Lang 03-09-2018 04:42

Well, they're humans, so mistakes can occur...

by the way, if an auction house intentionally writes incorrect descriptions (and this isn't the case), only to improve their income from the sellers' and buyers' commissions, such a firm, won't last long.

P.S.: I've never checked Catawiki sales: how are they, regarding quality, accuracy etc.?

xayraa33 03-09-2018 06:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elmar Lang (Post 2794525)
Perhaps another thing that persuaded the author of the catalogue description, to write: " (...)possibly made for field testing purposes without revealing the brand name." ...

That sounds more like a cop-out on their part, to absolve them from the possibility that the camera is intentionally mis-described.

I would expect a bit better product research from a hoity-toity auction house of renown. And that is an easy thing to do in the age of the internet and google, not 100% accurate, yes I agree, but better than a thinly disguised Caveat emptor to protect their posterior.

Many collectors ( and that is who this camera is aimed at) are fully aware of the No Name Kiev from around 1963, sold with the f2 Zeiss Jena Sonnar and also aware about the few rare and desirable and labelled post-war Dresden made Contax II .

Highway 61 03-09-2018 07:05

That's one of the famous "No name Contax" which used to be sold with a Zeiss-Opton Sonnar in 1963-1964. Those were "no name Kiev 4A" actually.

Here the accessory shoe has no serial number, so it can come from a Contax body. It also can be a blank Kiev part.

Otherwise, this is a Kiev 4A from the 1960 era with, here, a genuine prewar collapsible uncoated Sonnar. It's worth $25 for the body and $90 for the lens if all the lens elements are genuine Zeiss ones with a perfect, unscratched front element.

Read this (scroll down the article chapters) :

http://www3.telus.net/public/rpnchbck/zconrfKiev.htm

johank 03-09-2018 08:57

The bottom plate is a Kiev giveaway too.

Elmar Lang 03-09-2018 09:10

I see that all comments, perfectly coincide with my own observations, written in my opening post.

Due to the very good reputation of Westlicht, I am sure that it was just a human mistake. I haven't seen any other problem, reading the catalogue.

Best wishes,

E.L.

Paul T. 03-09-2018 09:14

That level of ignorance is pretty shocking.

Elmar Lang 03-10-2018 06:00

Sold for 2.000,- Euro, plus buyer's commission.

Chuffed Cheese 03-10-2018 06:20

wow...........

David Hughes 03-10-2018 07:10

ROFL...


"The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters. OK"

Highway 61 03-10-2018 08:31

There is one idiot waking up on every morning.

nukecoke 03-10-2018 08:43

No-name Kievs are not cheap, but not that expensive.

Elmar Lang 03-10-2018 11:09

I'll close my 1947 Kiev in a bank vault...

Pioneer 03-10-2018 13:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by nukecoke (Post 2794970)
No-name Kievs are not cheap, but not that expensive.

That one is. :D

Elmar Lang 03-12-2018 21:57

Reaching this hammer price, means that there should have been two bidders at least...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.