Originally Posted by Huss
I tried one out and did not feel that it gave me any advantages in actual use over the M240 I already had. And the pics that people have posted with the M10 - very nice but again I do not see any difference.
I don't know if the profiles issue is moot as while LR does have M lens profiles if you shoot in RAW, so you can pick anything you want, I don't think it corrects for pink edges etc. From what I've seen only for distortion and vignetting.
Right now I'm only musing really, but one thing may lead to another.
And yes, Leica service does absolutely suck. So there is that. The people in the LeicaStores have been wonderful, but if the camera needs to get sent to NJ (in the US) then enjoy watching the seasons change...
Huss I have a 262 and an M 10 and the M 10 is more responsive. No lag at all which the 262 and 240 can have at times.M 10 20,000 ISO is very usable and 3200 can band in the shadows or with underexposure with the 262. The M 10 would also be me advice.