Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Digital Cameras > CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras -

CSC : Digital Compact System Cameras - This new category of digital Compact System Cameras with interchangeable lenses was mislabeled for a time as "Mirrorless Cameras" by those forgetting about "Mirrorless" Rangefinder cameras.  Such confusion is easily understandable, since interchangeable rangefinder cameras were only recently introduced in 1932.  hmm.    CSC or Compact System Camera is probably the best category description to date, although I am fond of the old RFF desigation of  CEVIL  indicating Compact Electronic Viewfidner Interchangeable Lens.   This forum is here at RFF because via adapters these cameras offer an inexpensive way to use rangefinder lenses on digital cameras -- in addition of just about every 35mm SLR lens you can think of.  All  offer the photo enthusiast an incredible array of adopted lenses which was not possible before these new digital formats.   This group continues to grow in popularity and new camera models! 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 07-25-2019   #41
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 19,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by analogpics View Post
I'll probably eventually snag an m50 with the 32mm 1.4, but in the meantime i'll keep plugging away with my fuji setup thanks again for all the help guys!
If you do get the Canon... be sure to update this thread after awhile of use.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-26-2019   #42
analogpics
Registered User
 
analogpics is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
If you do get the Canon... be sure to update this thread after awhile of use.
Will do! I actually just saw they're releasing the EOS M5 mk2 and M6 mk2...so i'm just gonna wait for those to come out

https://www.canonrumors.com/the-cano...n-the-way-cr1/

Last edited by analogpics : 07-26-2019 at 10:29. Reason: why not
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2019   #43
oldwino
Registered User
 
oldwino is offline
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 139
I love my Canon M6 with the 32mm. But even smaller is the M6 with the 22mm. Great color, and easier files to work with than the Fuji (I shot one of the X-E3s for about a year).
__________________
wandering the Earth with an Leica I conv, M2, M-D, a bunch of old lenses, and occasionally a Mamiya-Six or Isolette III.

beckmeyerphotographs.format.com
current stuff https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2019   #44
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 19,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldwino View Post
I love my Canon M6 with the 32mm. But even smaller is the M6 with the 22mm. Great color, and easier files to work with than the Fuji (I shot one of the X-E3s for about a year).
What makes Fuji files hard to work with?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2019   #45
splitimageview
Registered User
 
splitimageview is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,995
Try Capture One Fuji.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2019   #46
markjwyatt
Registered User
 
markjwyatt's Avatar
 
markjwyatt is offline
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southern California
Posts: 613
I have been travelling a lot with my Zeiss Contax iia. Normally I have the Voigtlander SC Skopar 21mm f4 on it, but for what you want the Zeiss 50mm f2 Sonnar would be better (Shallow dof). An f1.5 would be even better for you. The camera is very compact and takes nice pictures.
__________________
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/markjwyatt/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2019   #47
markjwyatt
Registered User
 
markjwyatt's Avatar
 
markjwyatt is offline
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southern California
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
What makes Fuji files hard to work with?
De-mosaicking the files is different than all other sensors. The Fuji X-sensor is the only non-Bayesian sensor out there (that I know of).

Here is a description. It does not show advantages, but I suspect it may have a bit more film-like output than Bayer (just an unqualified opinion).

https://petapixel.com/2017/03/03/x-t...c-claims-test/
__________________
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/markjwyatt/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2019   #48
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 19,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by markjwyatt View Post
De-mosaicking the files is different than all other sensors. The Fuji X-sensor is the only non-Bayesian sensor out there (that I know of).

Here is a description. It does not show advantages, but I suspect it may have a bit more film-like output than Bayer (just an unqualified opinion).

https://petapixel.com/2017/03/03/x-t...c-claims-test/
That didn`t answer the question for me. I have been using the x-trans sensors since they came out...and I know it well. I`ve been using Fuji at the same time as using bayer sensor cameras. I don`t see any difference in post processing and I like to post process.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:00.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.