Originally Posted by David Hughes
Hmmm, well, um, I see it as proof that the well known thread about image vs. equipment has been around a lot longer than the internet and he being a poor working photographer made his point and kept his name in front of the public, which most pro's still try to do...
Sorry: what was the point in question? Might it have been that it was a stunt*? And is it not relevant that he did not subsequently switch to box cameras because they were all he needed?
*From the point of view of the present discussion, and indeed all discussions like it, unless one is determined to miss the point, which is that if you work within the limits of any camera you can produce good images. The problem arises when you need fancy stuff like a focusing lens, or telephotos, or variable shutter speeds.