Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > Polaroid & Fuji Instax

Polaroid & Fuji Instax All things Polaroid and Fuji Instax

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Instant back for 35mm SLR cameras
Old 06-12-2018   #1
taemo
Registered User
 
taemo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 33
Posts: 996
Instant back for 35mm SLR cameras

A new kickstarter for a 35mm Instax SQ back just came out, compatible initially for Nikon and Leica, with Pentax, Olympus and Canon afterwards.
I don't understand why they went with Instax SQ instead of Instax Mini to keep a closer 2:3 ratio instead of 1:1.
Also the image will be reversed left to right.

Tempted on backing for the Pentax as I don't want to butcher my M3.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...-135-slr-and-r
__________________
earldieta.com - flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #2
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Looks great!

No butchering of any camera should be needed as long as the camera back is easily removable. Just unhook the swinging back from the M3 (or M4-2 in my case) and fit the optical portion of the adaptation, then bayonet the film processor onto that. I put in a pledge for the Leica M unit ... they'll be first out of the gate, presuming the pledges meet their goal, and the price is lowest for the early pledges.

I prefer the crop to square format ... then you don't have to sweat about turning the camera to portrait orientation with that big lump hanging off the bottom. And the image size is a little nicer than the Instax Mini.

I love wacky gizmos like this.

PS: I remember the original Speed Magny well ... Used one with a Nikon F many an eon ago when someone brought it in to the camera shop I was working for at the time, about 1971 or so. It was darn cool to use a Nikon and get an instant print out of it!

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #3
seany65
Registered User
 
seany65 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 809
The basic idea is decent enough as you can check the lighting etc. but from an illustration near the bottom it doesn't seem like you get a very good/close view of the viewfinder.

I wonder how good the image quality is.

It doesn't look like they've tested with one but I wonder if it can fit on a Nikon F301?
__________________
An ever-growing amount of photo-stuff and a never-growing amount of photo-talent.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #4
emayoh
Rangefindered User
 
emayoh's Avatar
 
emayoh is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 135
I feel like backing just because of the John Berger tome in the sample images.
Cred status: earned.
...

Spoiler: Still probably won't back.
__________________
Mick O // @Redfishingboat
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #5
BillBingham2
Registered User
 
BillBingham2's Avatar
 
BillBingham2 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Posts: 5,724
I like the idea but would almost do it if:

- They turned the based 180 around and had it spit the film out the back

- Had a hand grip with a trigger release (something I can perhaps screw into the shutter release) that I can use to fire the shutter. Build it into the body to keep it reasonably small.

I'd go out and get an FM of some variant as it looks like fun. So for around $200 USD I think I could end up with an instant camera for my Nikkors MF Primes......

Great idea. One thumb way up, almost two.

B2 (;->
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #6
BillBingham2
Registered User
 
BillBingham2's Avatar
 
BillBingham2 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Posts: 5,724
Seems that if I had looked further on their page I would have seen the ejection port can point towards the back. I'm wondering if for the next version the hand grip (screw into the tripod port on the unit) could be made to eject the film say two seconds after you press the trigger on the hand grip.

B2 (;->
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #7
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
I’d like to see the first version produced before I ask for changes in the second version sion...
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #8
Livesteamer
Registered User
 
Livesteamer is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winston Salem North Carolina
Posts: 1,354
Get a Speed Magny back for a Nikon F. Do they still make instant film for that back?


Joe
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #9
Mackinaw
Think Different
 
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livesteamer View Post
Get a Speed Magny back for a Nikon F. Do they still make instant film for that back?
No, it used peel-apart instant film, like the discontinued Fuji FP-100C.

Jim B.
__________________
My fancy-schmancy gallery:
http://snowcountryphotography.com

My RFF Gallery:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...user=1453&sl=m
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #10
BillBingham2
Registered User
 
BillBingham2's Avatar
 
BillBingham2 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Posts: 5,724
The original is, well, BIGGER. I'd get a Crown Graphic with an instant back.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #11
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livesteamer View Post
Get a Speed Magny back for a Nikon F. Do they still make instant film for that back?
There's one available on Ebay at present:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Nikon-Mikam...e/183266933171

In another time, I'd have snapped it up—I have a Nikon F to play with. But without film being available, I'd have to convert it to Instax Wide or 6x9, or something like that, which would make it entirely too costly to play with. I didn't pay that much for the Nikon F, including the complete overhaul I had done to it.

No, this new toy is a much better deal.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #12
farlymac
PF McFarland
 
farlymac's Avatar
 
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 5,851
I bought a Speed Magny last year so I could mount one of my busted F's on it for display. Came in the original box, too, and looks like it was never used. It was something I had planned to do before Fuji killed pack film, so I went ahead with it even if it would only be for nostalgia sake. The price was right.


Over on PetaPixel they were riffing on how hard it would be to use the viewfinder (with one "expert" pointing out the two ports in the center of the rear of the Leica M, which just happen to be the flash ports), but at least on the Nikons and other SLRs you'd be able to use an angle finder. Is there not one also for the M?


PF
__________________
Waiting for the light
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #13
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by farlymac View Post
...
Over on PetaPixel they were riffing on how hard it would be to use the viewfinder (with one "expert" pointing out the two ports in the center of the rear of the Leica M, which just happen to be the flash ports), but at least on the Nikons and other SLRs you'd be able to use an angle finder. Is there not one also for the M?
It's not going to be all that hard, particularly with the Leica M. I don't listen to all that nonsense. I've managed to get my eye close enough to do what's needed with nearly any weird stuff hanging off and around the camera. Inconvenient, perhaps, but not hard.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2018   #14
zuiko85
Registered User
 
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,700
Mirror image though, with only one reflection. Just where are all these extra backs going to be found. Are they buying up a bunch of old cameras and stripping off the backs?
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #15
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
An update went to backers this morning. It had pictures showing the optics—which look good! all glass, multicoated and such—and fitment on a Leica M. The device is not as bulky as many seem to fear ... and, particularly on a Leica M, it looks like there will be no problem at all getting your eye to the viewfinder.

I tell ya, if they do a good job on the implementation, this is going to be a fun thing to shoot with. They've made it to 70% of their funding goal already...

Yes, the image will be left-right reversed. So what? Ever spent any time looking into a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad waist level finder? If you need it flipped, well, scan and flip it. Not a big deal at all, far as I'm concerned.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #16
olo530
Registered User
 
olo530 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 14
I don't know how much of a concern it really is, but I think it's worth pointing out:
1. Light loss - 3 stops. Turns ISO 800 into ISO 100
2. "Maximum effective aperture: f/4 (If using aperture larger than f/4, the incoming light value will remain at f/4"
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #17
retinax
Registered User
 
retinax is offline
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by olo530 View Post
I don't know how much of a concern it really is, but I think it's worth pointing out:
1. Light loss - 3 stops. Turns ISO 800 into ISO 100
2. "Maximum effective aperture: f/4 (If using aperture larger than f/4, the incoming light value will remain at f/4"

1. Is inevitable. If an image is being enlarged, it will get darker. The bokeh crowd will love that part.



2. I don't understand how that can happen. Anybody?


It sounds like a neat toy. A much more flexible way to shoot Instax. If it used instax wide, I would be tempted to back a kickstarter for the first time. Like this it's too small for my taste, and not even using cheaper instax mini, but the expensive instax square film...


and.. has anybody found info about which cameras it will work with? They only seem to list brands, but not specific models, which doesn't make sense. Backs differ.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #18
Oren Grad
Registered User
 
Oren Grad is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by retinax View Post
and.. has anybody found info about which cameras it will work with? They only seem to list brands, but not specific models, which doesn't make sense. Backs differ.
Scroll down on the campaign page. They do list the specific models.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #19
taemo
Registered User
 
taemo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 33
Posts: 996
I'm still on the fence on supporting this. Wouldn't mind giving this a try but I've had 50% success rate on Kickstarter (2 Kickstarters, still havent received my Ferrania film) and feel like I'm not losing much by paying full price later on once succesfull.
Plus I have the Mint RF70 on its way already later this year to keep me Instax happy.

Also I still can't make up my mind between a back for my M3 or Pentax MX
__________________
earldieta.com - flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #20
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by olo530 View Post
I don't know how much of a concern it really is, but I think it's worth pointing out:
1. Light loss - 3 stops. Turns ISO 800 into ISO 100
2. "Maximum effective aperture: f/4 (If using aperture larger than f/4, the incoming light value will remain at f/4"
Instax films are designed to operate with relatively slow lenses, which is just fine for their medium-size format.

To your point #1: Consider that the standard lens on most Instax cameras has an f/12 maximum lens opening (my Lomo Instant Square has a 95mm f/10 lens), I don't think light losses are much of an issue with any 35mm camera used as a host. Even an f/4 lens would net f/11 anyway with a three stop light loss. And even an f/11 lens on 2.4x2.4 inch format can produce nice out of focus blur at modest focusing distances.

What your point #2 means is that setting a fast 50mm lens to anything larger than f/4 nets no further increase in light going to the film due to the 'secondary iris' effect of the back's optical system. So, effectively, you've got a camera with an f/11 or smaller lens regardless what you put on the front of it, which is right in line with what Instax films were designed to operate best with.

I walked around my condo and backyard doing readings with a Sekonic light meter set to ISO 800, f/11 aperture priority reading. Outdoors, the exposures ranged from 1/125 to 1/1000 on this sunny day, from deep shade to open sun. Indoors (my living room, office, with large windows and blinds half open), I found I could cover most exposures with 1/8 to 1/30 second exposure times. Of course, most instant film like to have a little flash fill to manage contrasty circumstances in bright light, and that same little flash will help bring shutter times into a nice hand-holdable range.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #21
ptpdprinter
Registered User
 
ptpdprinter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,158
I can see how on paper this sounds like a good idea, but practically speaking, instead of using a bulky Rube Goldberg contraption, why not just get a SQ6?
__________________
ambientlightcollection.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #22
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by taemo View Post
I'm still on the fence on supporting this. Wouldn't mind giving this a try but I've had 50% success rate on Kickstarter (2 Kickstarters, still havent received my Ferrania film) and feel like I'm not losing much by paying full price later on once succesfull.
Plus I have the Mint RF70 on its way already later this year to keep me Instax happy.

Also I still can't make up my mind between a back for my M3 or Pentax MX
I've supported about 20 Kickstarters since they began operations. Fifteen completed and produced product so far, of which about 12 were very satisfying and the other three didn't do much for me once completed. The remaining 5 are still in active development, including this one, and I'm getting regular messages and activity from them.

The benefit of subscribing early (and I decided right off the bat that the Leica M was the right camera for this endeavor... ) was that I get the lowest price ($99 plus some for shipping). That's a little more than half price, if they make it. At this point, I'm fully expecting they're going to make their funding...

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #23
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptpdprinter View Post
I can see how on paper this sounds like a good idea, but practically speaking, instead of using a bulky Rube Goldberg contraption, why not just get a SQ6?
An SQ6 is never going to have a lens the quality of any Leica, Nikon, Olympus, or whatever lens, and has no lens options to play with.

It is a photo toy, for sure, but a lot of photo toys can make some amazing photographs. If you already have a compatible camera, fer gosh sake, why not spend a hundred bucks to make it do more rather than spend $130 for something which does a lot less?

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2018   #24
taemo
Registered User
 
taemo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 33
Posts: 996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godfrey View Post
I've supported about 20 Kickstarters since they began operations. Fifteen completed and produced product so far, of which about 12 were very satisfying and the other three didn't do much for me once completed. The remaining 5 are still in active development, including this one, and I'm getting regular messages and activity from them.

The benefit of subscribing early (and I decided right off the bat that the Leica M was the right camera for this endeavor... ) was that I get the lowest price ($99 plus some for shipping). That's a little more than half price, if they make it. At this point, I'm fully expecting they're going to make their funding...

G
99$ is not going to break the bank, decided to back the Leica version.
looking forward on giving it a try on my M3.
Might persuade me on getting a 12mm or 15mm lens later
__________________
earldieta.com - flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2018   #25
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Woo Hoo!

I received a campaign message this morning that the Instant Magny 35 campaign has already achieved their funding goal, and they're going ahead with the finish development to production.

There are still a few Nikon Kick-Off Deal pledges available, as well as a good number of Leica Kick-Off Deal pledges available, so if you were waiting to see if they'd reach their funding goal, time to go for it and get the best price!

I love this kind of stuff.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2018   #26
Steve M.
Registered User
 
Steve M. is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,896
No matter how good the lens is that you use, instant film gives softish images compared to conventional film. It's just the nature of the beast. I've seen lots of photos from Hasselblad cameras w/ Polaroid backs and even w/ a 'blad lens you don't get anything like you would from conventional film. It's nice to support new projects, but reality is reality, especially with today's instant films. The old Type 55 and 665 Polaroid film was fine grained, would give nice sharpness AND you got a negative, but they haven't made that for over a decade.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2018   #27
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve M. View Post
No matter how good the lens is that you use, instant film gives softish images compared to conventional film. It's just the nature of the beast. I've seen lots of photos from Hasselblad cameras w/ Polaroid backs and even w/ a 'blad lens you don't get anything like you would from conventional film. It's nice to support new projects, but reality is reality, especially with today's instant films. The old Type 55 and 665 Polaroid film was fine grained, would give nice sharpness AND you got a negative, but they haven't made that for over a decade.
So...? What's your point?
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2018   #28
farlymac
PF McFarland
 
farlymac's Avatar
 
farlymac is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 5,851
I was riding the fence on this because of an upcoming trip, and some stuff I needed done to the truck first. I'd have backed Leica and Nikon on it, but the truck wins, -$880.


PF
__________________
Waiting for the light
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.