Calibrating (digital) thermometers
Old 01-31-2019   #1
Tijmendal
Young photog
 
Tijmendal is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Age: 28
Posts: 506
Calibrating (digital) thermometers

It's been a while (2-3 years) since I've been serious about film photography, but I've got a darkroom now (hell yeah!) and getting back into it. I've got several thermometers, two of which I really like: a digital instant read one, and an old 'analog' Paterson meter, with a very precise scale (56/86f or 13/30c). I'd never tested them against each other, but I just did and the digital thermometer consistently measures 2 degrees C higher than the old one. How do I know which one is correct? I feel like both should be accurate, but apparently that's not the case.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2019   #2
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,293
There is no reason both devices should be accurate. Both of them could be wrong. Still, a 2 deg C difference does indicate one of them is off.

Proper calibration is not an easy task.

Calibrating for 0 deg and 100 deg. C is straightforward. For every 500 meters in elevation the boiling point decreases by ~0.5 C. The weather affects atmospheric pressure as well. Freezing points are also affected by pressure. But you need to calibrate for a different temperature range.

Calibration using other liquids, or mixtures of liquids, with know boiling points within the range you need could be hazardous without access to a laboratory with a chemistry hood.

ThermoWorks sells calibration tools.[1] They offer safe calibration liquid mixtures for $99/liter. You would also need a way to heat the bath. Their certified calibration simulators for digital thermometers start at $159.

ThermoWorks also sells high-quality, digital, immersion thermometers for brewing. These are NSF (National Sanitation Foundation) certified. I would just use one of their immersion thermometers.

Another option would be to use one of the thermometers you own. I'd assume the error in the temperature range of interest is constant. I would run a series of tests over a small temperature range. If you see a difference in quality I'd just use the optimum indicated temperature from there on. I doubt atmospheric pressure changes would be affect film/transparency development.

1/ I am just a happy customer who uses their products for cooking.
__________________
Basically, I mean, ah—well, let’s say that for me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it’s interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states—which has to do with the . . . contest between content and form.
Garry Winogrand
williamchuttonjr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2019   #3
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: by the river called the Gender
Age: 42
Posts: 7,819
check for freezing and boiling point accuracy and the rest shall be linear enough in-between.
As willie says, For every 500 meters in elevation the boiling point decreases by ~0.5 C.
Meaning if oyu are at 1000m altitude your boliling temp should be 99 deg not 100 (C)
The rest is not important unless you have a storm while doing it.
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2019   #4
Malcolm M
Registered User
 
Malcolm M's Avatar
 
Malcolm M is offline
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 49
Get a job in a lab, then you have a choice of several UKAS certified thermometers accurate to 0.1C to check against. My thermometer is spot on.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2019   #5
css9450
Registered User
 
css9450's Avatar
 
css9450 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,842
I work in a lab (not a photo lab) and we have a large master thermometer which is checked regularly by the state if Illinois. A traditional mercury thermometer. We use that one to check the rest of the ones we have, the ones our technicians use.

For developing film, I use a digital thermometer I bought at Target. It seems accurate.... But I really should bring it in sometime and check it.
__________________
Nikon S2, S3, F, F2, F3, FM2, FA, N90S, D80, D7000, D750, Sony a6000, Canon IIf, Leica CL, Tower type 3, Zorki 4, Vito B, Perkeo II, Rollei 35....
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-31-2019   #6
Deardorff38
Registered User
 
Deardorff38 is online now
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 636
put the thermometers in a slurry of ice & water.... they'll come down to 32F/0C. Then you can see how far off the digital ones are. Some of them can be adjusted. If not you can just mark the offset on a piece of tape & adjust the reading by that amount each time.
  Reply With Quote

thermometer calibration
Old 02-10-2019   #7
randy stewart
Registered User
 
randy stewart is offline
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 60
thermometer calibration

An accurate thermometer is desired, however in B&W (and to a lesser degree, in color) consistency is more important. In other words, once you accept a set of process standards (time/temp/agitation), it is most important that you be able to repeat your results. Years ago I acquired a Kodak lab grade mercury thermometer (the one in the stainless steel casing) which is accurate to 1/4 degree F. I have a Kodak process thermometer, which is not quite as high a quality, but very good. I check them against each other, then against the metal dial thermometers is use day to day, which can be adjusted to calibrate. I also have a photo digital thermometer reading to 0.1 degree F. The whole bunch is good within a degree, so I good to go.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.