adapting CJZ Contax lenses to Leica
Old 02-07-2019   #1
jshcrlsn
obsessive bumbling idiot
 
jshcrlsn's Avatar
 
jshcrlsn is offline
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Pensacola, FL
Age: 37
Posts: 3
adapting CJZ Contax lenses to Leica

Good afternoon,
I just acquired a very nice early un-coated Contax CZJ 5cm f2.8 Tessar and would like to use it on my Leica M digital. It seems there are adapters out there such as this one

(Amedeo Zeiss Contax Rangefinder Mount to Leica M Mount)

However, these are very expensive and understandably so as it is a bit more complicated then just a question registry distance and mount. Specifically because the mount includes the helical focus body.

My question is this...
If I buy a cheapo mount to adapt the lens (one without a helical focus function). Can I just use this built in collapsible bayonet to push/pull focus? I am unsure if the focus body turns the lens out past the extended bayonet distance.

Alternately, should I maybe just consider selling it and getting an early un-coated Elmar? Or other lens (Canon ltm 5cm f2.8?). I hear it has very similar performance and will provide the classic Tessar look which is what I am after. I specifically want the older Tessar look and not as interested in the modern or coated versions even when considering price.

Open to other ideas as well and thanks for all who contribute here. It has helped me tremendously.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2019   #2
lonemantis
Registered User
 
lonemantis is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 185
Unfortunately, using the lens' collapsing mechanism won't allow you to focus normally. Any adapter you use will generally be designed for your lens to focus to infinity when mounted. The helical will then extend away from the flange in order to focus closer. Collapsing the lens will move it closer to the flange, therefore focusing *past* infinity, and will therefore not form a usable image.

If you are only planning to use the 5cm Tessar lens on your Leica, Amedeo makes an excellent adapter for 50mm lenses specifically, which you can find on his ebay page. Not only does it reverse the focusing direction to match Leica lenses, but is also rangefinder-coupled down to 0.6m - far closer than the original mount. It's not cheap, but I've been using one with an uncoated 5cm F1.5 Sonnar from 1937, with excellent results.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2019   #3
splitimageview
Registered User
 
splitimageview is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,979
Amedeo makes superb adapters, I’ve had both types (50mm specific and the standard adapter.)

That said, you can probably pick up a Tessar-style uncoated lens for less...
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2019   #4
Bingley
Registered User
 
Bingley's Avatar
 
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 5,665
bought an Amedeo adapter for my Zeiss Opton Sonnar 50/2.0 to use on a Leica M3... xpensive but worth every penny....
__________________
Steve

FS: Zeiss-ZM Planar 50 plus hood, Pentax MX, Voigtlander Ultron 40/2.0 SLII in Pentax K-mount, Takumar 100/2.8 and 35/3.5 lenses: See my ads in Classifieds

M3, M2, R2A, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
Minolta XD11, Pentax ME Super, and assorted MD Rokkor and Takumar lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleicord Vb, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS

My Flickr
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2019   #5
retinax
Registered User
 
retinax is offline
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 880
I'd say the adapter is probably not worthwhile for just this lens, unless you've tested it somehow and are absolutely in love with it. You could get either a Kiev or maybe even Contax body, or a tessar in ltm, such as an elmar, Canon, Minolta... or one of the Soviets, for less.
OTOH the adapter would allow you to use other Contax lenses in the future..
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2019   #6
jshcrlsn
obsessive bumbling idiot
 
jshcrlsn's Avatar
 
jshcrlsn is offline
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Pensacola, FL
Age: 37
Posts: 3
Thanks for the thoughts and suggestions. You all seem to lean in the same direction my mind was already headed on this matter.

I guess Ill need to do some makeshift free lensing and barrow or rent an old Elmar and do some dirty work to decide.

Anyone know if the Canon ltm 5cm f2.8 is a clone of the old style Tessar? I know the design of the Contax CZJ changed significantly around post war which I assume is around when Canon started making their lineup of range finder lenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2019   #7
rfaspen
Registered User
 
rfaspen's Avatar
 
rfaspen is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 1,681
Looking for Tessar "look" on a digital M:

Not sure if you've considered the FSU lens Industar-22. Yes, its very inexpensive and sometimes discounted as a mere FSU lens, but its actually a fine lens in terms of performance and I believe it is more of a true Tessar than the Elmar. I happen to have 2 or 3 of this lens and I've used them to get photographs I like -- film and digital.

They are so inexpensive I think you could chance getting one (or a few) and trying it out. I don't recommend collapsing it on a digital body though .

There are in existence LTM Tessar lenses (actual Tessar lens). I think Zeiss made some, but I also know there are quite a few "adapted" Tessars out there. Our longtime RFF member raid might have one. I suppose with some patience and looking, you could find one for yourself.

Or grab an I-22.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2019   #8
jshcrlsn
obsessive bumbling idiot
 
jshcrlsn's Avatar
 
jshcrlsn is offline
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Pensacola, FL
Age: 37
Posts: 3
Thank you rfaspen...yours is the voice of the sensibility here. I suppose I like to think of myself as a shooter and not a collector even though I get bouts of GAS that cannot be explained or helped at times. Ill look around for some examples from the Russian lenses and see what I like about them.

I welcome some comments from "RAID" as well if he does indeed have an ltm Tessar. I started my journey with an old 50mm Tessar and find myself drawn back to it after a few years of playing with other glass.

I am also very interested in finding the look produced from the Rolleiflex 2.8 Planar/Xenotars in rangefinder form as well. Again, Specifically from the era of the 2.8C-F. I love those cameras and the images they produce and would like to translate this to RF in some way. I know the format is different and it wont be exact but I am sure there are RF formulas that compare out there. Possibly a Xenon/Summarit or another old Biotar/Planar variant. I have really grown to like the quirks and flaws of the old glass over newer more corrected designs and coatings.

Recommendations?
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:10.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.