Old 05-24-2019   #41
Registered User
BillBlackwell's Avatar
BillBlackwell is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 873
Originally Posted by jrose125 View Post
... Is there any real reason to buy a TTL over a Classic?...
As far as I'm concerned - none, whatsoever.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2019   #42
Registered User
sanmich's Avatar
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,358
The one really important difference, for me, would be to get the 0.58 finder.
But that's because I wear glasses.
I have settled on M6 classic + M7 0.58X.

Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)

My site
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2019   #43
Likes Leicas
Rob-F's Avatar
Rob-F is online now
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 78
Posts: 5,966
Originally Posted by presspass View Post
I have both and use them interchangeably. The TTLs have had more recent CLAs than the classics so they are a bit quieter. The meter display is different. The classic has the two arrows; when both are lit, the meter says the exposure is correct. The TTL has two arrows and a center dot. When the dot is illuminated, the exposure is correct. It will also light the dot and either the underexposure or overexposure arrow; that indicates a half stop either over or under, so it is a bit more precise. In use, once you've become accustomed to the way the meter reads, there is no major difference. Both cameras will operate without batteries - only the meter fails to work - but the TTL will not fire any flash if the battery is exhausted. If for some reason you decide to use a Visoflex, only the III will work with the TTL - the body is just a bit taller than the 2, 3, 4, and 6. The Visoflex 11 will work with those models as well.
The TTL was also available with the .58, .72, and .85 viewfinders. The classic is typically a .72 viewfinder; there were .85 models made but they are rare and expensive.
Hope this helps.
This pretty much says it all. I prefer the metering display of the M6TTL over the classic. I like that center dot. However the ability of the eye and brain to set the exposure to perfectly balance the brightness of the two arrows on the M6 classic, is quite good! So the TTL's center dot doesn't really lead to more accurate exposures. The Classic is just as accurate.
May the light be with you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-26-2019   #44
Registered User
jrose125 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 102
I'd just like to thank everyone for their input!

In the end I ultimately found an excellent deal on a .72x TTL that made it difficult not to spring for it. CLA'd last month and it's paired up with a 35mm Summicron V3 that was also CLA'd with the camera body. The comments about the electronics issues are a bit concerning but where this body was made in the year 2000 I hope that it will be good for years to come.

Thanks again everyone!
Leica M6 TTL .72x
Nikon F5
Nikon F2
Fujica GW690II
Rollei 35T
Minolta Weathermatic 35
Instagram- jakerosephoto
Flickr :https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-28-2019   #45
Registered User
leicapixie is online now
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto.Canada
Posts: 1,598
The big shutter dial an improvement..
Going wrong way compared to M3 and M2 causes wrong speed selection..
Why didn't Leica make meter work for that direction?
Personally I kinda hate the meter (accurate) but i wind up following the dot..sigh!
  Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02.

vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.