Expose to the left or right?
Old 5 Days Ago   #1
Ron Montad
Registered User
 
Ron Montad is offline
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 18
Expose to the left or right?

When shooting film, should I expose to the left or right with respect to the histogram? Does the answer depend on whether I’m shooting negatives or slides?
  Reply With Quote

Old 5 Days Ago   #2
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
 
Dante_Stella's Avatar
 
Dante_Stella is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,753
Film doesn't have a histogram until you scan it, so the general rule is:

- Negative film: expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights

- Slide film: expose for the highlights, keep your shadow expectations low, pray the lab doesn't botch it

But if you shoot with something like T-Max 400, slightly more generous that "normal" exposure usually does the trick, because the film has a linear response to light, so all you are really trying to do is get things in the shadows to register.

Dante
  Reply With Quote

Old 5 Days Ago   #3
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,277
B&W film exposure should match the preferred development technique. This is a means for the photographer to influence image rendering – particularly for those using a pure analog workflow.

Film exposure levels can influence image scanning as well. In general, underexposure causes problems.

"The biggest problem with negative film is underexposure. In the moment we open the shutter, light falls on the film and densities start to build up. If you close the shutter too early, not enough light hits the film and the negative will become too thin. I have mentioned in my previous blog post that negative film has a relatively flat response curve. When underexposing film we only use a small portion of the response curve and a lot of the information we would like to capture falls in the lowest section of the curve, the so called toe. Here information is lost or not enough tonal separation is provided. In the worst case we even don't get enough light in the shadows to build up any density on the film"

Theses conclusions are consistent with information theory. The purpose of film is to convert light into spatial information. Underexposure means less light. Less light means less information. Of course severe overexposure destroys information as well. The latitude of most negative films means thoughtful exposure to the right has minimal risk.
__________________
Basically, I mean, ah—well, let’s say that for me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it’s interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states—which has to do with the . . . contest between content and form.
Garry Winogrand
williamchuttonjr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 5 Days Ago   #4
Ron Montad
Registered User
 
Ron Montad is offline
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 18
I plan to use my Nikon D800 as a light meter - hence the reference to a histogram.
  Reply With Quote

Old 5 Days Ago   #5
ptpdprinter
Registered User
 
ptpdprinter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,539
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
Theses conclusions are consistent with information theory. The purpose of film is to convert light into spatial information. Underexposure means less light. Less light means less information. Of course severe overexposure destroys information as well. The latitude of most negative films means thoughtful exposure to the right has minimal risk.
Funny how that works: both underexposure and overexposure are bad. A lot of people bad mouth the Zone System, but if you ever go to the trouble of establishing your own EI for the films and developers you use, you know the downsides of not getting exposure right up front. It saves a lot of time both in the darkroom and with post processing of digital images.
__________________
ambientlightcollection.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 5 Days Ago   #6
a.noctilux
Registered User
 
a.noctilux is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Montpellier, Occitanie
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Montad View Post
I plan to use my Nikon D800 as a light meter - hence the reference to a histogram.

Not bad idea, but not practical to use.


- are you sure that the ISO is the same (really same I mean) with Nikon DSLR and your film in use ?
- if this is the case, I would center at best the histogram, if the subject is uniformly lighted to have the best "gray spread" in negative, and best exposed slide
- to resume, in "studio photo", I'd bracket as usual
if you have time to have histogram, you'd have time to bracket


-have fun with your experiences and let us know
  Reply With Quote

Old 4 Days Ago   #7
Steve M.
Registered User
 
Steve M. is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,158
Using another camera for a light meter will work, but you won't be having any fun doing it. $30 will buy you a perfectly good CDS hand held light meter. Shoot, $30 will buy a budget 35mm SLR or rangefinder camera w/ an in camera meter.

Whether we shoot film or digital, photography is all about light, so this will be a good opportunity to slow things down maybe and observe the quality of the light around you w/ your eyes and see how it translates to meter readings. Film is much more forgiving than digital when it comes to "creative" metering exposures.
  Reply With Quote

Old 4 Days Ago   #8
Ko.Fe.
Me. Write ESL. Ko.
 
Ko.Fe.'s Avatar
 
Ko.Fe. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MiltON.ONtario
Posts: 6,823
Last time I checked, it was no histogram on film.
I'm using my brain, left and right parts.
  Reply With Quote

Old 4 Days Ago   #9
Ccoppola82
Registered User
 
Ccoppola82 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 250
What I used to do is to take my 6d on spot meter mode, place the spot on my shadows and make sure you set it to -2. That reading will get you into zone 3 on your shadows. Develop highlights accordingly. For roll film I’ve had good luck doing a 2 bath development of three is a major difference in scene contrast throughout the roll.
__________________
Leica M2/M6
Hasselblad 500CM

Instagram
Coppola_Art
  Reply With Quote

Old 3 Days Ago   #10
leicapixie
Registered User
 
leicapixie is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto.Canada
Posts: 1,518
Talking

I do use P+S digital as a guide BUT have learned the hard way, digital sees in dark..
Film does not! Even so it's a guide as mt Exposure meter needs a LED.
Another problem unless you really check esp. using auto on Nikon, it may "do it's own thing". Check Metadata,.
Test a few rolls and get an idea of your actual exposures and Film ISO..
Lenses do not always transmit all the light, shutters on mechanical cameras can be all over the place.
Film may also not be that exact ISO.. sigh!
Carrying that monster DSLR as a meter..rather use a paper guide on back of RF.
  Reply With Quote

Old 3 Days Ago   #11
olifaunt
Registered User
 
olifaunt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 145
You can also use the film exposure guide; it's a small table, for example for Portra 400 https://imaging.kodakalaris.com/site...portra_400.pdf. You can also use a cellphone.

Negative film is very forgiving and you don't have to worry too much. Far less worries than with digital. If in doubt just overexpose rather than underexpose. You can overexpose several stops with many negative films and your pictures will look fine. In fact many people like overexposing color (negative) film a stop or so to reduce grain.
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #12
Lauffray
Invisible Cities
 
Lauffray's Avatar
 
Lauffray is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal
Age: 31
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante_Stella View Post
- Negative film: expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights

How exactly do you develop for the highlights?
__________________

WebsiteFlickrInsta
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #13
Saul
fighting inertia
 
Saul's Avatar
 
Saul is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lauffray View Post
How exactly do you develop for the highlights?
If we assume the discussion about developing for the highlights refers only to b/w, then you would have two variables to manipulate: time of development and concentration of the developer.

But that ignores the particular type of developer used since many developers excel at either decreasing or increasing film contrast as a distinct property.

It all relates to the specific subject tones, the light at the time of shooting and how you 'see' the final result taking shape.
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #14
Freakscene
Deregistered user
 
Freakscene's Avatar
 
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lauffray View Post
How exactly do you develop for the highlights?
By developing enough to get good highlight separation but not so much that you get so much density that you can’t scan or print the film.

The major variable is development time. To a (much) lesser extent, you can also use decreased agitation or greater developer dilution, which cause more localised exhaustion in the highlights and provide proportionally less development there.

But it’s mostly about getting the time right.

Marty
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #15
Bill Clark
Registered User
 
Bill Clark's Avatar
 
Bill Clark is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minnetonka, Minnesota
Age: 70
Posts: 2,448
Negative type film I try to slightly over expose. When I used transperancy film I would one-half to maybe one stop under expose.

With digital I work at achieving adequate balance throughout each exposure. The histogram is a good tool because the image on the screen doesn’t accurately show what the exposure is with the RAW file. Digital I slightly under expose.

My tastes, I hate it when I see a photograph of people in the foreground with blown out or, at the very least, over exposed background. The sky is usually not white! I see this a lot and it just shows the lack of discipline the photographer brings when making the photograph. But it was easy for me to point this out to prospective clients and many hired me just because of the care I showed when making photographs for a very important event. They didn’t care about my equipment or technical and creative skills. They liked the photographs I made.

At any rate, there you have it. Now go and make beautiful photographs.
__________________
I can freeze time.
What's your super power?
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #16
Ccoppola82
Registered User
 
Ccoppola82 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 250
On roll film there is no way to accurately develop for highlights IF your frames have varying contrast. In these cases I tend to use a 2 bath (some use stand or semi stand) development because it keeps highlights in check and sorta “averages” the scene contrast on the entire roll. You run the risk of having flat negatives, but In most cases I’m ok with that and adjust contrast in post or with contrast filtration on the enlarger.

In the event that your frames are all the same contrast level, you can adjust the development by extending or decreasing time. Ex. For heavy overcast day with LOW contrast, I will try to push the highlights 1 stop by extending development 20%. If it’s a bright sunny day with high contrast, I will pull the highlights back one stop by decreasing development by about 20%. Bring a sharpie pen and mark your roll as soon as you remove it. (I’ve been in a hurry and couldn’t remember what damn roll things were)
N= normal Dev
N+1 = extended by 20%
N-1 = reduce by 20%

There may be people who do things another way, but this tends to work well for me and is fairly simple when put into practice
__________________
Leica M2/M6
Hasselblad 500CM

Instagram
Coppola_Art
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #17
retinax
Registered User
 
retinax is offline
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 698
The histogram doesn't tell you which part of your scene has what brightness, which can be important. For difficult exposure, you can use the spot metering function as someone has explained above. That said, the histogram can be good enough if you experiment a bit to learn where e.g. zones III and VII are on it. This may depend on your contrast settings in the digital camera, unless it has raw histogram!
For flat-ish scenes where you don't need make a decision for what part of the scene to expose because it all will be captured easily, the histogram should work very well, in that case you can indeed expose to the right.
  Reply With Quote

Old 2 Days Ago   #18
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,277
With apologies for straying from the issues of film exposure, in-camera histograms are not very useful.

These histograms are lossy compressed estimates from the in-camera JPEG. With all but a very few cameras, the in-camera histogram estimate depends on the in-camera JPEG rendering parameters.

For in-camera JPEG users this is a good thing. For raw file users the histogram can be modified to simulate a representation of the raw file. This is achieved by a tedious process where you systematically modify the in-camera JPG rendering parameters and visually compare the in-camera histogram with the histogram displayed on your computer screen by the raw rendering software. You use the in-camera JPEG rendering parameters that happen to similar histograms for both screens.

The same goes for in-camera highlight overexposure blinkies.
__________________
Basically, I mean, ah—well, let’s say that for me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it’s interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states—which has to do with the . . . contest between content and form.
Garry Winogrand
williamchuttonjr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Day Ago   #19
Ron Montad
Registered User
 
Ron Montad is offline
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 18
Let's back up a bit. What I'm really looking for is some advice on how to set the exposure on a manual camera which has no meter at all. The sunny-16 ain't gonna cut it for me. So... it boils down to some sort of meter. I've considered the following: an iPhone app, a DSLR, a small pocket meter (Sekonic Twinmate), an incident meter (white dome), a spot meter, a combo meter (incident and reflective). I'm not a pro wedding photographer or anything like that. I'm just a guy who wants to walk around like a tourist. I'm certainly not going to develop for highlights, since I don't even know what that means. What's in your gear bag?
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Day Ago   #20
leicapixie
Registered User
 
leicapixie is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto.Canada
Posts: 1,518
A scene comprises bright areas and shadows under a sunny sun.
If one exposes only for the deepest shadows, the bright areas (may) be well over exposed.
Depending on the film, black and white, color negative different end results.
Kentmere 400 does not tolerate over-exposure and white/bright areas will be burned away.
The negative will have very dark areas for the whites..
Before buying equipment gadgets, read about exposure and film.
The Life books on photography do an excellent job.
Ansel Adams is too complicated for a novice.
Minor White only for sensometric engineers..
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Day Ago   #21
olifaunt
Registered User
 
olifaunt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Montad View Post
The sunny-16 ain't gonna cut it for me.
May I ask why not? If you shoot negative film, which is a good starting point, it really is extremely forgiving. Just try a couple of rolls and you will see it is really a completely different world from digital. You can always check with a lightmeter app on your phone - but honestly for negative film you don't need to be very accurate, except avoid underexposure, so if in doubt expose a little more; nothing bad will happen - develop normally and you will get a little denser negatives but you can adjust them during printing or scanning (assuming the scanner is good) so they look fine.

It's slightly more complex than just sunny 16: Here is the guide for Portra 400 film for different conditions, still quite simple:

Bright or Hazy Sun on Light Sand or
Snow
1/500
f/16
Bright or Hazy Sun (Distinct
Shadows)
1/500
f/11*
Weak, Hazy Sun
(Soft Shadows)
1/500
f/8
Cloudy Bright
(No Shadows)
1/500
f/5.6
Heavy Overcast or Open Shade‡ 1/500
f/4

Use f/5.6 for backlit close-up subjects.
‡ Subject shaded from the sun but lighted by a large area of sky.
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Day Ago   #22
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 78
Posts: 5,789
I agree that it's best to use a meter, for consistent results. And it's best to "dial in" the film and developer combination by either shooting test rolls, or else at least keeping notes on exposures and developing times, and making fine adjustments on each successive roll until we know what works for us.

I especially like Willie 901's comments, above.
__________________
May the light be with you.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:15.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.