Is the ME ugly?

Is the ME ugly?

  • Strongly disagree

    Votes: 108 26.9%
  • Disagree

    Votes: 114 28.4%
  • Agree

    Votes: 116 28.9%
  • Strongly agree

    Votes: 63 15.7%

  • Total voters
    401
it would look even better if the red dot was replaced with a black dot..just my 2 cents..
Dear Dennis,

This is a fun one. Under the terms of using the Leica name (shared with microscopes and surveying instruments) they can put black dots ONLY on black cameras. Then, it isn't a dot: it's Leica written on an all-black camera. Strange but true. But they don't go out of their way to prosecute dot-swappers.

Cheers,

R.
 
Dear Dennis,

This is a fun one. Under the terms of using the Leica name (shared with microscopes and surveying instruments) they can put black dots ONLY on black cameras. Then, it isn't a dot: it's Leica written on an all-black camera. Strange but true. But they don't go out of their way to prosecute dot-swappers.

Cheers,

R.

Oh wow I did not know this. Thanks for telling me about this. It's certainly interesting for them to stick with their principles on this one.
 
No it is not.

p1280944886-3.jpg

And the images it makes...depends on me.
 
Dear Dennis,

This is a fun one. Under the terms of using the Leica name (shared with microscopes and surveying instruments) they can put black dots ONLY on black cameras. Then, it isn't a dot: it's Leica written on an all-black camera. Strange but true. But they don't go out of their way to prosecute dot-swappers.

Cheers,

R.

when I was in solms on november 6th/7th I was told that nowadays they only put black dots on special edition cameras where they originally were when these cameras were built. so they return them to the original state when repairing/fixing them but otherwise it will always be a red dot
 
when I was in solms on november 6th/7th I was told that nowadays they only put black dots on special edition cameras where they originally were when these cameras were built. so they return them to the original state when repairing/fixing them but otherwise it will always be a red dot
Quite possibly, but the two stories are not necessarily mutually exclusive. I got my version from two Leica repair techs in 2012 at photokina -- the guys who actually do the dot swaps.

Cheers,

R.
 
chief of customer care and the leading technician told me...

they said they get many requests, especially from users of black leicas.

the background for that issue is that they arent allowed to put new black dots on leicas anymore. their reference were law issues. they didnt went any further. it was during a guidance through the factory and customer care while having a look at the latest products
 
Leica camera does not own the logo, it is owned by another, separate company, Leica Microsystems (microscopes) and licensed to Leica Camera . The owner wants the logo exclusively in red. As simple as that.
Btw, it is logical that the Microscope company ownes the brand. It is much older than the camera division.
 
The M-E is a beautiful fresh approach to M design
I like the gun metal colour and lack of frameline selector so much I have swapped my M9 for an M-E (cash difference of course, but i see that as giving me two years more warranty!)

Perhaps the ugly votes are M9 owners protecting their investment?
 
I just ordered an ME so I obviously don't think it is ugly. Have both silver and black lenses so looking forward to seeing how the new finish looks with both types. Won't have trouble distinguishing it from my chrome M2.
 
Looks good with either chrome or black lenses.


M-E005 by areality4all, on Flickr


M-E001 by areality4all, on Flickr

The one I got was listed "display model" and came with 96 actuations from the dealer--less, if I remember correctly, than what my new M8 came with. Save big, buy at the end of a cycle. Get the peace of mind of the full warranty and all the bugs ironed out. Definitely not ugly!
 
Back
Top