Silvrwhls
Member
This thread hasn't moved in a while....
7II with 43mm and mamiya polarizer for the 2nd shot. Kodak Ektar 100 and low res scans. Copyrite 2012 Karl Wertanen
The old Ore Dock in Marquette Michigan on Lake Superior.
A random stream near Munising Michigan during the 1st week of October.
7II with 43mm and mamiya polarizer for the 2nd shot. Kodak Ektar 100 and low res scans. Copyrite 2012 Karl Wertanen
The old Ore Dock in Marquette Michigan on Lake Superior.
A random stream near Munising Michigan during the 1st week of October.
rphenning
Established
that last one looks beautiful, nicely seen.
johnwood
Member
Mam7ii + 43mm + velvia 100f
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/39265644@N00/3843375365/lightbox/)
(http://www.flickr.com/photos/39265644@N00/3843375365/lightbox/)
Attachments
kingqueenknave
Well-known
StoneNYC
Infrequent Visitor
Very very nice!
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
scottyb70
Well-known
StoneNYC
Infrequent Visitor
Is 100VS a portra? Is it still in production?
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
scottyb70
Well-known
No, Kodak 100vs is a slide film and is discontinued. Only have 3 more rolls left in the freezer.
StoneNYC
Infrequent Visitor
Gotcha
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
k__43
Registered Film User
Levi Wedel
Member
Mamiya 7II, 50mm, Kodak Portra 160VC
untitled 0411_02 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0412_08 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0416_01 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0414_10 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0411_02 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0412_08 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0416_01 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
untitled 0414_10 by Levi Wedel, on Flickr
useless generation
Established
Nice Levi! Love the 2nd and 4th shot. Not helping the 7II cravings
Levi Wedel
Member
Thanks! haha I understand completely, I only bought my 7II a few weeks ago.
StoneNYC
Infrequent Visitor
I have a 150mm, a 65mm, and a 43mm
I just can't bring myself to buy another lens in between those, they seem to be fairly good at capturing what I need. But I can see using the 50mm for some things. Still it's all about budget, and that says NO lol.
I've actually started shooting at f/16 lately, I just like the full detail deep detail. With the 43mm I haven't noticed any center resolution issues. Or do you mean specifically with the 50mm?
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
I just can't bring myself to buy another lens in between those, they seem to be fairly good at capturing what I need. But I can see using the 50mm for some things. Still it's all about budget, and that says NO lol.
I've actually started shooting at f/16 lately, I just like the full detail deep detail. With the 43mm I haven't noticed any center resolution issues. Or do you mean specifically with the 50mm?
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
Gregoyle
Well-known
Markus, that first shot is amazing. Did you just get lucky for the train to stay in one place for 60 seconds, or did you plan it that way?
Markus
Established
As you stop down, the border resolution starts to increase, while the center resolution first increases and than dectreases. The test mentioned around f8 would be perfect. I haven't done any resolution tests with my lenses.
Well, just to give you some help: I know, that in the DSLR-World an IQ like that is very rare - even if you want to spend $$$ or $$$$$. The only lens, I own that can keep up with that is the Canon 40mm STM for very small $. Why? Because its optical design is somehow similar. All other lenses with shorter focal lenght don't deliver such IQ in the corners - Except the ZEISS Distagon 21mm or Tilt/Shift lenses, but again: $$$$. So Mamiya has manufactured very fine lenses. The system isn't cheap, but every lens seems to be worth the money. There is no lens with a disapointing performance - and after 7 years with Canon I like that idea.
I also think there will never be a rangefinder again like the Mamiya 7 , so if you can, go for this lens. There is a certain difference between the 43mm and the 50mm.
And if you take a look at the image cirlce of a Mamiya lens and a Canon lens, you get more with the Mamiya lens
Well, just to give you some help: I know, that in the DSLR-World an IQ like that is very rare - even if you want to spend $$$ or $$$$$. The only lens, I own that can keep up with that is the Canon 40mm STM for very small $. Why? Because its optical design is somehow similar. All other lenses with shorter focal lenght don't deliver such IQ in the corners - Except the ZEISS Distagon 21mm or Tilt/Shift lenses, but again: $$$$. So Mamiya has manufactured very fine lenses. The system isn't cheap, but every lens seems to be worth the money. There is no lens with a disapointing performance - and after 7 years with Canon I like that idea.
I also think there will never be a rangefinder again like the Mamiya 7 , so if you can, go for this lens. There is a certain difference between the 43mm and the 50mm.
And if you take a look at the image cirlce of a Mamiya lens and a Canon lens, you get more with the Mamiya lens
StoneNYC
Infrequent Visitor
As you stop down, the border resolution starts to increase, while the center resolution first increases and than dectreases. The test mentioned around f8 would be perfect. I hacen't done any resolution tests with my lenses.
Well, just to give you some help: I know, that in the DSLR-World an IQ like that is very rare - even if you want to spend $$$ or $$$$$. The only lens, I own that can keep up with that is the Canon 40mm STM for very small $. Why? Because its optical design is somehow similar. All other lenses with shorter focal lenght don't deliver such IQ in the corners - Except the ZEISS Distagon 21mm or Tilt/Shift lenses, but again: $$$$. So Mamiya has manufactured very fine lenses. The system isn't cheap, but every lens seems to be worth the money. There is no lens with a disapointing performance - and after 7 years with Canon I like that idea.
Also I think there will never be a rangefinder again like the Mamiya 7 , so if you can, go for this lens. There is a certain difference between the 43mm and the 50mm.
And if you take a look at the imagecirlce of a Mamiya lens and a Canon lens, you get more with the Mamiya lens
Thanks that was very helpful, I was actually considering the 40mm STM but you need the adapter for full frame cameras, so it's still $400+ but you've given me some thought...
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
scottyb70
Well-known
Mamiya 7 w/43mm lens, scanned with epson 4990 and betterscanning holder
StoneNYC
Infrequent Visitor
Wow both are great especially the second, is that Velvia?
~Stone~ The Noteworthy Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic. Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
scottyb70
Well-known
Kodak E100VS is the first one and the second is Kodak E100G with Cokin Polarizer