dee
Well-known
I realise that Fuji, with the X-Pro1 and X-T1, brought back a similar experience to my Minolta SRTs, rather than any expectation of the special sensor.
The X-Pro / 27mm has been the most used as a semi-compact shoulder bag carry-all as I was used to a the 45mm Rokkor in 35mm terms.
However , I could not resist the exquisite X-T100 on closeout @ £ 350 primarily for the tiny 15-45. [same outlay as the new X-Pro-i / 27mm in mid 2016]
I even went for Champagne and have now fallen for its charm.
I know it's a conventional sensor, but has the familiar film modes and menu.
It's small and light enough to permit a touch more flexibility in an everyday camera.
Despite the useful, in bright light, of the OVF of the X-Pro, I am still hooked on the SLR style familiar from 1972.
dee
The X-Pro / 27mm has been the most used as a semi-compact shoulder bag carry-all as I was used to a the 45mm Rokkor in 35mm terms.
However , I could not resist the exquisite X-T100 on closeout @ £ 350 primarily for the tiny 15-45. [same outlay as the new X-Pro-i / 27mm in mid 2016]
I even went for Champagne and have now fallen for its charm.
I know it's a conventional sensor, but has the familiar film modes and menu.
It's small and light enough to permit a touch more flexibility in an everyday camera.
Despite the useful, in bright light, of the OVF of the X-Pro, I am still hooked on the SLR style familiar from 1972.
dee