dee
Well-known
It appears that the X-T 100 lacked the facilities for current generation photographers , so they rapidly brought out the X-T 200 which apparently , does .
Something about wi-fi I surmise .
I usually trawl for ex-dem / seriously outdated remnants , so a new , recent camera is new to me .
i like the rendering of the X-T1 , but the standard sensor of the X-T100 stands up to the current competition , pls the SLR styling and EVF , so fine by me .
i don't need all the facilities of the X-T 100 - just to be able to take OK snapshots , with a similar interface , so when the Fuji dropped to clearance I admit I jumped in purely because it is a gem in Champagne and stands a better chance of long life compared to my 1st Generation X-Pro/X-T 'cos spares might be scarce .
The semi macro setting on that infuriating electric zoom is new to me , plus the lightweight , welcome in the age of arthritis , but I have the other kit zooms should I need them .
regards
dee
Something about wi-fi I surmise .
I usually trawl for ex-dem / seriously outdated remnants , so a new , recent camera is new to me .
i like the rendering of the X-T1 , but the standard sensor of the X-T100 stands up to the current competition , pls the SLR styling and EVF , so fine by me .
i don't need all the facilities of the X-T 100 - just to be able to take OK snapshots , with a similar interface , so when the Fuji dropped to clearance I admit I jumped in purely because it is a gem in Champagne and stands a better chance of long life compared to my 1st Generation X-Pro/X-T 'cos spares might be scarce .
The semi macro setting on that infuriating electric zoom is new to me , plus the lightweight , welcome in the age of arthritis , but I have the other kit zooms should I need them .
regards
dee