nukecoke
⚛Yashica
If I had to buy something scam-y, I'd buy the Yashica Y35 and save the 3000+ $ for hem, another digital camera.
santino
FSU gear head
At least it looks good...
I hope they are going to lower the price by 1500 or so.
I hope they are going to lower the price by 1500 or so.
bayernfan
Well-known
sometimes i hate it when i'm right. :bang:
Corran
Well-known
Should've stayed vaporware.
Huss
Mentor
I'm surprised that they can source 12mp aps-c sensors. What do those cost now, a nickel?
DougFord
on the good foot
Perhaps a monochrome sensor. Keep it simple. Presumably the designers would rather write the code for a monochrome source. Or did they specify otherwise?
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Who would buy this over a used M240? I mean it is a nice design and I do think it is cool to see someone attempt something new, but you can't charge the Leica tax on an under-spec'd camera when you are not Leica...
Good point!
YouAreHere
Established
Maybe this one is proof of concept and their next model will be what the M9 was to the M8.
Now? I've never seen any other 12mp 4/3 sensor used in a camera...
Paul T.
Mentor
it's a niche camera. Priced at far less than was the M-8 on launch. It's meaningless to compare the price with a second-hand camera in terms of whether it's a rip off. In fact it's silly to call it a rip-off; plainly no one will make a fortune from this. 20 per cent of that price in Europe will be purchase tax anyway. So stop being grumpy old men.
Far more important than the price, which professional photographers will offset against tax anyway, is corner smearing and how well that rangefinder actually works. When folks are getting all nostalgic about the Epson RD they ought also to remember how we had to keep sending the damn things off for RF recalibraiton etc.
Far more important than the price, which professional photographers will offset against tax anyway, is corner smearing and how well that rangefinder actually works. When folks are getting all nostalgic about the Epson RD they ought also to remember how we had to keep sending the damn things off for RF recalibraiton etc.
presspass
filmshooter
I really enjoy threads like this. It's amazing how many people have opinions about a product that has no firm price, no firm specifications, and no firm release date. Talk about vaporware.
mod2001
Old school modernist
Then you should visit the German DSLR-Forum, they have a part there which is solely dedicated to speculations, 50 pages and more about a yet unknown camera or lens ore whatever are not unusual. And if the product gets announced (like the PiXII), there is then another part which is only dedicated to announcements, adding another 50 pages or more. For example in case of the Canon R, 522 posts in the speculation part and 1787 posts when the R was announced but still no clear specs or price available.
Juergen
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
I cap my JPEG1 and if camera is capable, RAW files to 10-12 MP.
And I convert my edited JEPG1 files to 2MB, 2800 pixels on long side.
12MP might be the fw cap for fast transfer. This camera meant to be external camera for mobile phone and for those who are using mobile devices to edit images and to look at them on Insta.
It is a niche product indeed. Who needs MPs and large sensor if pictures are edited and viewed on mobile phone?
I think these guys knew and understand more than Zeiss.
And I convert my edited JEPG1 files to 2MB, 2800 pixels on long side.
12MP might be the fw cap for fast transfer. This camera meant to be external camera for mobile phone and for those who are using mobile devices to edit images and to look at them on Insta.
It is a niche product indeed. Who needs MPs and large sensor if pictures are edited and viewed on mobile phone?
I think these guys knew and understand more than Zeiss
.
Fjäll
■̷̛̈́̉̓́̽&
How about making an affordable and simple digital Leica M mount camera?
Larry Cloetta
Mentor
For whatever reason, manufacturers and dreamers have decided they will try any and everything but that.
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
My film Leicas are 20 to 50 years old and built like a tank. Same with my Rollei TLRs. They will last forever even with regular use. What I don’t understand is why make a solid metal digital M when it’s practical life span is less than 10 years and most people upgrade within 3 or 5? Can digital M Leicas be more affordable if made from a polymer exterior or would the fans not buy it at all? Seems like an obvious place to cut costs? Or maybe offer an alternative model with a more disposable shell?
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Why do you think the "practical life span is less than 10 years"? I see no reason why any current Leica M digital camera can't last 15 to 25 years. My 2003 Olympus E-1 DSLR is still going strong, and makes lovely photographs. Heck, even my M-D typ 262 is already almost three years old ... it's a long, long, long way from being worn out or unusable.
The fact is that most any quality digital camera made in the last decade and a half was likely discarded long before it was used up due to the forces of marketing and rising user expectations, not through lack of reliability and durability.
G
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
In this disposable society I tip my hat to you sir. I am also using an M8.2. However not everyone feel the way you. But then again I am sure companies would prefer their consumer base to keep buying and buying and not having the used market as their biggest competitor.
Bille
Well-known
c.poulton
Well-known
I really liked the concept of the Pixii - unobtrusive and as close to a film camera as you can get, however the cost is unbelievable and completely out of my range. It's a crop sensor as well! I've just checked and I can buy a new Fujifilm X-Pro2 for £1,119 or €1,240 - under half the price!
I'm sorry, I really wanted to like the Pixii but they've killed it with their pricing.
I'm sorry, I really wanted to like the Pixii but they've killed it with their pricing.