Fuchs
Well-known
Trying to mount an Olympus VF-1 on my Leica X, it does not slide completely to the end of the hot shoe. Has anyone tried this and failed to mount it?
asiafish
Established
It won't work. The Olympus VF-2 is compatible with the X2 and X Vario, while the X113 uses the new EVF released with the Leica T. No Leica to my knowledge works with the Olympus VF-1.
gbealnz
Well-known
I was going to back up Asiafish, and agree, but decided to check before I did.
From a quick search it would appear that the VF1 is actually an optical frame finder, so it "should" slide into the hot-shoe perfectly.
Andrew is correct in that the correct EVF for the X is the new Visoflex which also fits the Leica T.
Gary
From a quick search it would appear that the VF1 is actually an optical frame finder, so it "should" slide into the hot-shoe perfectly.
Andrew is correct in that the correct EVF for the X is the new Visoflex which also fits the Leica T.
Gary
JoeV
Thin Air, Bright Sun
The VF1 window and frameline is of a 4:3 aspect ratio, not 3:2. It was intended for micro-4/3 Olympus cameras.
I bought one for use on my Fujifilm X10, whose native format is also 4:3. It works great, optically, but like the OP's experience wouldn't slide all the way on to the X10 hot shoe. I ended up having to shave off a bit of thickness from the VF1 mount using a Dremel tool. There's some nonstandard thickness to the VF1. The problem is not the Leica.
~Joe
I bought one for use on my Fujifilm X10, whose native format is also 4:3. It works great, optically, but like the OP's experience wouldn't slide all the way on to the X10 hot shoe. I ended up having to shave off a bit of thickness from the VF1 mount using a Dremel tool. There's some nonstandard thickness to the VF1. The problem is not the Leica.
~Joe
Fuchs
Well-known
I know the aspect ratio is 4:3, but I've found there's not a "big" difference for my style of RF or non SLR shooting.The VF1 window and frameline is of a 4:3 aspect ratio, not 3:2. It was intended for micro-4/3 Olympus cameras.
I bought one for use on my Fujifilm X10, whose native format is also 4:3. It works great, optically, but like the OP's experience wouldn't slide all the way on to the X10 hot shoe. I ended up having to shave off a bit of thickness from the VF1 mount using a Dremel tool. There's some nonstandard thickness to the VF1. The problem is not the Leica.
~Joe
And yes, I ended doing exactly the same filing to the finder shoe. Thank you for your reply, I was afraid the Leica had some hidden contact or feature that interferred with the VF slider.
Fuchs
Well-known
It won't work. The Olympus VF-2 is compatible with the X2 and X Vario, while the X113 uses the new EVF released with the Leica T. No Leica to my knowledge works with the Olympus VF-1.
Asiafish, the Olympus VF-1 is a 4:3 35mm eq optical viewfinder, only the VF-2 to VF-4 are electronic finders
Jim Evidon
Jim
For the X type 113, you have to use the very expensive Leica Visoflex (020) which is made by Epson for Leica and not made by Olympus. The electronic connections are in the hot shoe and not below it like on the Oly made finders such as the EV-! et al.
jc031699
Established
To make the vf-1 fit in the hotshoe of my Panasonic GF-1, I had to lightly sand the base to make it thinner and slide in. As reported, it matches well with the FOV of the stealth Leica 20mm lens.
cboy
Well-known
I wouldn't bother with the vf-1 finder imo. The finder is dim and isn't as clear compared to other offerings. If you want enjoyable experience with your type 113 I'd suggest another finder from voigtlander or Leica. Ideally the 36mm finder native to Leica
Alternatively is the visoflex. But by today's standards it's extremely slow , lack resolution and also isn't bright. I found the lag very frustrating. So much so that I abandoned the system because it wasn't fit to be used for its intended purpose which was for fast action street photography.
It's a shame though as it's compact setup and fantastic lens it could of been quite good for street if only they continued to develop it. But It obviously was the precursor to the Q.
Alternatively is the visoflex. But by today's standards it's extremely slow , lack resolution and also isn't bright. I found the lag very frustrating. So much so that I abandoned the system because it wasn't fit to be used for its intended purpose which was for fast action street photography.
It's a shame though as it's compact setup and fantastic lens it could of been quite good for street if only they continued to develop it. But It obviously was the precursor to the Q.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.