The Dark Art of Composition

I'm sticking with black and white. It's easier than figuring out what color sheets to put on the bed. Color becomes less a concern as the years pass by. I've reached that point in life where even some of the "young" chicks sport white or grey hair.
 
Sparrow said:
600 million years ago when the first multi cellular organisms appeared those that were more sensitive to light ate those that were less. Then later those that were more sensitive to changes in the light ate those that were less sensitive to changes in the light. That went on for a bit until everything moved about had eyes of some sort and our ancestors were up a tree in Mozambique looking for berries.
Click to expand...

Stewart, just to be clear, I am enjoying your presentation. But kind sir, would you please stick to photography and perception.

Please skip this evolution *theory* narations and speculations unless clearly stated as so. You don't really have to go farther back than saying "This is how our eyes work..." :)
 
I want Kodak to bring back Ektachrome Infrared film.

Whoops! That magic orange filter I used to use with it went off with the rest of my 58mm filters last week. The film though, it was truely magic also.

I don't think that digital sensors see far enough into the infrared part of the sprctrum to get the same color rendition.

http://thepriceofsilver.blogspot.com
 
Last edited:
Has anyone suggested this thread be made a 'sticky' yet?

When the occasional question about composition arises in a post it would be good to be refered to this thread!
 
Thank you for the very informative read Stewart! And yes, like Keith suggested, this should be made into a sticky!
 
Thanks a lot, this was one of the best threads ever... Both the content and the slightly humorous tone - I wish more of the postings on the net had the same!

Will there be an encore???
 
One thing I have noticed, or think I've noticed is the lack of vertical oriented photos in the modern world. Is it the influence of television? Too much trouble to rotate the camera 90º? Or, maybe it's my imagination.

Too me, vertical compositions seem to be meeting the same fate as adverbs among athletes and sports writers.
 
And to think this marvellous thread was here the whole time I've been a member. Thanks to Dick for bumping it back to current pages.
 
Bike Tourist said:
One thing I have noticed, or think I've noticed is the lack of vertical oriented photos in the modern world. Is it the influence of television? Too much trouble to rotate the camera 90º? Or, maybe it's my imagination.

Too me, vertical compositions seem to be meeting the same fate as adverbs among athletes and sports writers.
Click to expand...


The big-wigs (i.e. curators, portfolio reviewers) tend to frown on "portrait" photos vs. "landscape" photos. The "vertical"/"portrait" style is not the norm, and sometimes they stand out on their own merit (as opposed to the "distraction" committed upon big-wig viewers when mingled with other "landscape"/"horizontal" shots). Some get into a big tizzy over it. And I mean big. So, by applying the theory of "trickle-down", you can see (heh) that it tends to be segregated along the whole photo consumer (and I mean that in the visual, not commercial, sense) chain.

There will always (always always) be the "who cares!"-ist who either doesn't want to be bothered with what others want, but more with what he wants, and deride rules just for being rules.

I respect somebody's work who can successfully digest rules, and can also show when they can not be applied, and who doesn't go down the empty-calorie road of pointing out an exception as evidence that the rule is silly.
 
Stewart, I just stumbled upon this thread, and it is fantastic! How about an encore? I am sending this thread to my daughter who is an art/ photography major in college.
 
BardParker said:
Stewart, I just stumbled upon this thread, and it is fantastic! How about an encore? I am sending this thread to my daughter who is an art/ photography major in college.
Click to expand...

as one of those silly fellows who teaches this stuff, in college, i would hazard a guess that she is quite up to speed on this. Wucius usually rolls out in the first year of curriculum as a means or logic to discuss these things.

either way, a fabulous thread. i often wonder though, how much has this logic influenced our visual 'perception' of the world about us? did the need for a logic influence how we perceive harmony or is it naturally occurring? certainly 'pattern' in nature speaks to this.
 
Gabriel M.A. said:
The big-wigs (i.e. curators, portfolio reviewers) tend to frown on "portrait" photos vs. "landscape" photos. The "vertical"/"portrait" style is not the norm, and sometimes they stand out on their own merit (as opposed to the "distraction" committed upon big-wig viewers when mingled with other "landscape"/"horizontal" shots). Some get into a big tizzy over it. And I mean big. So, by applying the theory of "trickle-down", you can see (heh) that it tends to be segregated along the whole photo consumer (and I mean that in the visual, not commercial, sense) chain.

There will always (always always) be the "who cares!"-ist who either doesn't want to be bothered with what others want, but more with what he wants, and deride rules just for being rules.

I respect somebody's work who can successfully digest rules, and can also show when they can not be applied, and who doesn't go down the empty-calorie road of pointing out an exception as evidence that the rule is silly.
Click to expand...

which has occurred in history. during the renaissance the ideas of volume and linear perspective became de rigueur. the exploration of said concept has disappeared and reappeared, or its relevance challenged, numerous times. Cubism was preceded by the common idea that volume was understood and thus it was unnecessary to spend so much time
(and canvas) on 'explaining' it to us.
 
Any thoughts on composition when making photographs of people?

Two additional topics to think about:

Posing
Lighting

Your thoughts?

Thanks!
 
7364517284_522f185cb4_b.jpg



see this photo, black and white

by hohn Vincent on Flickr
 
a great classic text on composition

a great classic text on composition

Try this one: "Landscape and Figure Composition By Sadakichi Hartmann"
It's in google books (free -- it's PD).

I read this one (after many many others) and it all suddenly made sense.

George
 
emraphoto said:
as one of those silly fellows who teaches this stuff, in college, i would hazard a guess that she is quite up to speed on this. Wucius usually rolls out in the first year of curriculum as a means or logic to discuss these things.

either way, a fabulous thread. i often wonder though, how much has this logic influenced our visual 'perception' of the world about us? did the need for a logic influence how we perceive harmony or is it naturally occurring? certainly 'pattern' in nature speaks to this.
Click to expand...


In my opinion, interesting exercises, Rudolf Arnheim, and so forth…
But I don’t believe it will help during actual picture taking process.
Person does not think in words, person thinks in images. When person takes picture of what he thinks a beautiful arrangement (of people, trees, and subjects) he mentally compares it to his visual memory markers of "what is beautiful". Weather he knows it or not, he flips thru all the beautiful things and- look here- this one matches, therefore it is beautiful.
This knowledge is obtained during person’s visual art education (or lack of thereof).
That’s why, simply speaking, once you start leafing thru albums of Picasso and Klimt, you are not that impressed by majority of your average “wall calendar landscapes” any more 
Don’t get me wrong, I am not denying there are indeed laws and principles of perception by our mind. But breaking and transforming these laws is what titans like Picasso do. They teach us the new markers of beauty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top