Best fixed lens RF viewfinder?

Best fixed lens RF viewfinder?

  • Olympus 35SP

    Votes: 81 7.4%

  • Olympus 35RC

    Votes: 56 5.1%

  • Olympus 35RD

    Votes: 20 1.8%

  • Olympus XA

    Votes: 53 4.9%

  • Minolta 7s

    Votes: 30 2.8%

  • Minolta 7sII

    Votes: 40 3.7%

  • Canon QL17 GIII

    Votes: 206 18.9%

  • Konica Hexar fixed lens

    Votes: 201 18.5%

  • Konica S3

    Votes: 46 4.2%

  • Yashica GSN

    Votes: 162 14.9%

  • Other

    Votes: 193 17.7%
  • Total voters
    1,088
Chuck A

Chuck A

Chuck A
Local time
10:05 AM
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
364
Hi All.

I haven't tried very many of the fixed lens rangefinders and I am interested in trying some of the others. I have tried the Oly SP and RC. While neither of them were impressive the SP was definitely better.

While I don't expect any of them to have a viewfinder like a Leica M, I am interested in you opinions on which ones have the best viewfinder. I am interested in clarity, focusing speed and useability. I have included a list of the ones that I am interested in but I am sure that there will be others. If you have another just vote for other and explain it in a message.

I am sure that others would benefit from your experience. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
EDIT: Oops. Misread your question. The Hexar probably has the best VF on that list.

:eek:


William
 
Are these comparable at all? The Hexar is about a hundred times larger than the XA, no wonder it has a better finder. The XA's finder is actually quite amazing for its size, if you get one with a contrasty rangefinder patch.

Philipp
 
I have a few of these, and leaving finder magnification aside, I find the easiest to use are those with a clear and contrasty rf portion.

I have found that the better ones I have (QL17, Konica C35) have a frosted glass illumination window. The worse ones have a translucent corrugated plastic piece to illuminate the framelines/rf. (Minolta 7SII, Oly 35RC)

I have cleaned the viewfinders on all of mine, the Canonet ( which got my vote) when clean is really pretty good, the Minolta looked great without the topplate (and its plastic piece) on, but as soon as its back together its back to 35RC standard, which itself is not great, but I love its size and handling.

Of course none are up to Leica standard, and if dirty all are low contrast and flarey.

EDIT: Never seen through the Hexar RF, but I would expect it to be good, its in a different price range to the others you posted!
 
Last edited:
rxmd said:
Are these comparable at all? The Hexar is about a hundred times larger than the XA, no wonder it has a better finder. The XA's finder is actually quite amazing for its size, if you get one with a contrasty rangefinder patch.

Philipp
Click to expand...

I probably shouldn't have included the Hexar here. I have never seen one and didn't realize it might be in a different class from the others.

It has been a long time since I have seen an XA. I didn't remember the VF being any good, but that was 25 years ago. I would love to see one now.
 
ben lloyd said:
I have a few of these, and leaving finder magnification aside, I find the easiest to use are those with a clear and contrasty rf portion.

I have found that the better ones I have (QL17, Konica C35) have a frosted glass illumination window. The worse ones have a translucent corrugated plastic piece to illuminate the framelines/rf. (Minolta 7SII, Oly 35RC)
Click to expand...

I didn't know this. It is a good tip. I was thinking about getting a 7sII to see if the viewfinder was better than my RC. I may hold off on that now.
 
Chuck A said:
I didn't know this. It is a good tip. I was thinking about getting a 7sII to see if the viewfinder was better than my RC. I may hold off on that now.
Click to expand...

Just been looking through both, the 7SII is a little lower in vf mag (ie. everything appears smaller), but the rf image is ever so slightly more contrasty, and lacking the slight yellow tint of the 35RC, hope it helps.
 
ben lloyd said:
Just been looking through both, the 7SII is a little lower in vf mag (ie. everything appears smaller), but the rf image is ever so slightly more contrasty, and lacking the slight yellow tint of the 35RC, hope it helps.
Click to expand...

Sure does Ben. It is such a help to have you folks to get advice from. The rf patch on my RC seems pretty dim. I have trouble seeing it in low light. It was cleaned before I bought it but who knows if it was done correctly.

I really like the size and portability of the RC. I wish the vf was a bit better.
 
OK, now I 've been squinting though them all one after the other.

VF mag: (there's not a huge amount between them but here you go...
Biggest>Lowest:
Canonet>35RC>7sII>Konica C35

Rf patch: subjective best to worst:
Canonet > C35 > 7sII > 35RC
 
ben lloyd said:
OK, now I 've been squinting though them all one after the other.

VF mag: (there's not a huge amount between them but here you go...
Biggest>Lowest:
Canonet>35RC>7sII>Konica C35

Rf patch: subjective best to worst:
Canonet > C35 > 7sII > 35RC
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info and don't get a headache from all that squinting.
 
Chuck A said:
I really like the size and portability of the RC. I wish the vf was a bit better.
Click to expand...

I hear that!
On the street its prefocus and shoot, but I had a bad time trying to do low light gig photos with it once.

I'd love to know about others though, my samples may be duff ones of course, but I really shouldn't be looking for more 70s compact rfs!!!
 
Last edited:
For the most part the 70s rf are inexpensive and fun. (Unless you go for a Canonet in black, which seems to bring a fortune) They have their drawbacks though: No manual metering, small viewfinders, etc.

Mostly I like the sizes. Most of them are smaller than the current crop of rangefinders. Also, most of them are much quieter. The RC is whisper quiet. I have thought about getting a Bessa R,R2,R2A,R3A, for the better vf and metering but keep thinking I should wait. They are fairly large and are not all that quiet. The Leica Ms are almost as large but they are quieter. But they are pretty pricey. I really would eventually like to get an M6, but for now the 70s rangefinders will have to do. I do miss that M2 I sold many years ago.
 
Many on your list have manual metering. Of those you've listed, I have the SP, C35, 7s, RC & XA. I'd rank them in roughly that order; I think the SP is great, but maybe that's because its what I use the most.
 
Trius said:
Many on your list have manual metering. Of those you've listed, I have the SP, C35, 7s, RC & XA. I'd rank them in roughly that order; I think the SP is great, but maybe that's because its what I use the most.
Click to expand...

While it had a nice viewfinder the SP that I had was quite a bit louder than my RC. Also, while it has manual metering it was always a pain to use. IMHO that is. Many people really like it.

What other have manual metering? I guess the Hexar probably does, which others?
 
Man, have you guy's missed the boat! If you're talking FIXED lens RFs, consider Konica's Auto S2 for 35mm cameras or Fuji's 645 RFs for medium format. Why? Because in addition to auto parallax correction, the frame lines shrink to also correct for field size as you focus close up. I think the Konica Hexar AF also did this as well.
 
Chuck: Yes, the SP shutter is louder, but that wasn't part of the original question/poll. As far as metering goes, the EV system on the SP is different, but if you get used to it, it's not a pain ... for me.

The RC, as I have used it, has manual metering. Some people don't believe it, and the manual doesn't mention it. But if you depress the shutter release half-way, voila. At least it has worked for me.

The 7s has manual metering. Again, it's EV system, so you may not like it.

awilder: Well, I've never had an S2, but would probably like it. From what I've read its size may not be to my taste, so the S3 might be preferable for me, though I'd lose manual metering.
 
awilder said:
Man, have you guy's missed the boat! If you're talking FIXED lens RFs, consider Konica's Auto S2 for 35mm cameras or Fuji's 645 RFs for medium format. Why? Because in addition to auto parallax correction, the frame lines shrink to also correct for field size as you focus close up. I think the Konica Hexar AF also did this as well.
Click to expand...

I have been seriously looking at the Fujis since my Yashicamat bit the dust.
 
Trius said:
Chuck: Yes, the SP shutter is louder, but that wasn't part of the original question/poll. As far as metering goes, the EV system on the SP is different, but if you get used to it, it's not a pain ... for me.
Click to expand...

I know that some people don't mind it and I guess that is no more of a step than using a handheld meter.

The RC, as I have used it, has manual metering. Some people don't believe it, and the manual doesn't mention it. But if you depress the shutter release half-way, voila. At least it has worked for me.
Click to expand...

I don't understand. When I put my RC into manual mode and depress the shutter release halfway it just shows me the aperture and shutter speed that I have set. It doesn't meter correctly. As I change the aperture and ss it changes in the vf. Perhaps we are not meaning the same thing by manual metering. Let me know.

The 7s has manual metering. Again, it's EV system, so you may not like it.
Click to expand...

I have heard good things about this camera and may try one.

Anyway thanks for the reply.
 
Chuck: I will pull out my RC and check; you may be correct.

PM on the way regarding the 7s.

Earl
 
I think the GSNs, the hi-matics and the canonets are very close.

The hexar is better but you'd expect that for its price and size. It's a different category.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top