Solving The Mercury Battery Dilemma: A Quick Guide

Jason Schneider

the Camera Collector
Local time
10:58 AM
Joined
Feb 28, 2020
Messages
422
Solving the Mercury Battery Dilemma
A handy guide to non-toxic workarounds for vintage cameras & meters

By Jason Schneider

Beginning in the early 1960s, battery powered CdS, and later, SBC cells, were steadily replacing bulkier, less sensitive selenium cells in the metering systems built into cameras and handheld exposure meters. Compared to their selenium cell-based counterparts, these new battery powered meters and metering systems worked at far lower light levels, had narrower acceptance angles, making it easier to get accurate readings from shooting position, didn’t require a delicate micro-ammeter, and could be integrated more compactly into camera bodies without the telltale honeycomb grid. However, unlike selenium cells that generate a measurable current on their own when exposed to light these new meters required batteries.

Initially, most camera and meter manufacturers turned to mercury batteries, technically known as mercuric-oxide cells, to power these new meters and metering systems because they offer a host of operational advantages. Mercury batteries deliver a very constant voltage over their long lifespan and then die suddenly, virtually eliminating the potential for inaccurate readings; they don’t require complex metering circuitry; and they have a remarkably long shelf life—up to 10 years, and even longer under refrigeration. There’s only one problem with mercury batteries, but it’s a killer—they’re extremely toxic, especially when they’re incinerated with other waste, or wind up in landfills. That’s why the EPA sponsored Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act of 1996 prohibited the use of mercury in all types of consumer batteries, and mercury-free batteries such as alkaline and silver-oxide cells became the de facto international standard for most camera batteries.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

Banned Battery: Varta V625PX mercury cell, like others of its ilk, is no longer made or sold worldwide, but there are excellent alternatives.

The Great Battery Conversion Kerfuffle

The basic problem for photographers using one of the scores of vintage cameras and meters designed to take 1.35v mercury cells is that the currently available alkaline and silver oxide cells that will fit their devices’ battery compartments put out a higher voltage—generally in the 1.5 -1.6v range. Installing a higher voltage button battery directly in place of the defunct mercury cell won’t usually damage the device, but the meter readings can be way off—as much as 2-3 stops. However, if you check the reading against a camera or meter of known accuracy and it’s consistently, say, one stop off on the overexposure side, you can compensate by setting a one stop lower ISO—200 instead of 400. But before you simply set it and forget, check the reading at several different light levels to make sure its response is linear.

Bottom line: The best way to ensure long-term metering accuracy with today’s batteries in your vintage camera or meter is to make sure it puts out the same voltage the device was designed for. The most practical solutions: 1. Use current zinc-air cells of the correct size and voltage. 2. Have a competent repairman wire a voltage-modulating diode into your camera’s metering circuitry. 3. Purchase an MR-9 Mercury Battery Adapter that has built-in voltage-reducing circuitry. All three methods work well, but each has its upsides and downsides.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

MRB625 1.35v zinc-air cell replaces PX635, PX13, and MR-9 mercury cells

Zinc-Air Batteries

The great advantages of Zinc-Air batteries are that they provide a stable voltage, have a storage life of up to 10 years when not activated, and are literally drop-in replacements for their respective mercury cells—no adapters required. The downside is that they must be activated by removing a pull tab to expose holes in the casing that allow ambient air to interact with the electrolyte to generate a current. If these holes remain open when the camera or meter is stored, the life of the cells can be substantially reduced—from months to weeks or even days depending on the precise storage conditions. Removing the zinc-air battery or batteries and replacing the tab(s) when they’re not in use can definitely prolong their life, but it’s an off-putting inconvenience. User reviews on zinc-air cells run the gamut from extremely positive to harshly negative, so as they say, “Your experience may vary.”

rs=w:1440,h:1440

MRB625 Wein Cell, its most popular zinc-air cell, in its original packing

Wein Cells

By far the most popular brand of zinc air cell is the Wein Cell that’s available at numerous online selling sites and major photo specialty retailers. The best-selling version is the Wein MRB625 1.35v Zinc-Air Battery (about $5.00) that’s equivalent to the discontinued PX625, PX13, PX67, and MR-9 mercury cell used in many vintage devices. Others include the 1.35v Wein MRB675 that replaces the PX675, and the 1.35v Wein MRB400 that replaces RM400R and V400PX cells. For more tech info, contact Micro-Tools Division of Fargo Enterprises in Vacaville, CA. Phone: 707-446-1120.

Modifying the camera to work with available batteries

Wiring a voltage-modulating diode into your camera’s metering circuitry so it gives correct exposure readings with currently available batteries has the great advantage of being a permanent fix that requires no modification of the battery compartment, spacers, etc. for the new batteries to fit. The downsides: most consumers will have to send the camera (or meter) to a competent repair shop to do the job, and it typically costs $50-$60 plus the cost of 2-way shipping.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

This 1N34 diode is permanently wired into camera's metering circuitry to allow the use of available silver-oxide or alkaline cells going forward.

The most common diodes used in this operation are the 1N34 germanium diode, which drops the battery voltage by 0.3 to 0.35v, the Schottky diode that drops the voltage by about 0.25v, and the silicon diode 1N4002, which drops voltage by 0.7v and is suitable for applications requiring two 1.5v batteries. All these diodes are wired in series with the battery, and they’ll work with silver-oxide cells (preferable because they deliver a steadier voltage) or alkaline cells (which drop voltage at a faster rate and should be replaced at shorter intervals—every year at least). Due to variations in metering circuitry, most competent repairman make sure to calibrate the metering system after modification to ensure that the readings are still within spec —make sure yours does so before sending your camera in.

The MR-9 Battery Adapter

Made in Japan by Kanto, the MR-9 Voltage Reducing Converter has an imbedded microelectronic adjusting circuit that drops the 1.55v output of a 386 silver-oxide cell (or equivalent) to the 1.35 volts required by cameras or meters designed for mercury cells. Just insert a 386 cell into the adapter, and the entire unit fits directly into virtually any battery compartment designed for PX625, PX13, EPX625, MR9 or equivalent batteries. The MR-9 adapter will also work with the slightly deeper, higher capacity SR44 or 357 silver-oxide cells, providing the battery compartment has spring contacts that will allow the battery- compartment cover to be screwed down fully. The upsides: It’s a do it yourself solution, and the adapter itself a one-time purchase that has no moving parts and can be used for as long as it’s needed.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

MR-9 Battery Adapter alone (left), and with 386 silver-oxide cell in place (right) prior to inserting it in camera's battery compartment.

The MR-9 Mercury Battery Adapter ($39.95) is distributed in the U.S. by C.R.I. S., 190 North 54th St, Chandler AZ 85226, Tel # 800-799-0293, email: CRISCAM.COM. The MR-9 is the only battery adapter C.R.I.S. currently has in stock, but they also list the V27PX adapter for four 386 cell applications, the HM-4N Adapter that accommodates one 4SR44 battery, and the H-B Adapter for the 377 battery They’ll all be available when stocks are replenished.

Warning: Not all adapters are created equal

There are many so-called mercury battery adapters offered on major selling sites such as Amazon that only adapt smaller batteries to fit larger battery compartment receptacles and do nothing whatsoever to alter the voltage of the inserted batteries. They may be of some value in other applications, but steer clear them if you’re aiming to use current silver-oxide or alkaline batteries in a device that was designed for mercury batteries. If you’re tempted, check out the scathing reviews on Amazon before you click “buy.”

rs=w:1440,h:1440

Pretty but (mostly) useless, cheap size adapters like these let you put smaller batteries in bigger battery compartments but they don't alter the voltage.

More than you wanted to know about mercury battery solutions

For a fascinating 14-page screed that covers this topic in excruciating detail and includes a number of ingenious labor-intensive DIY solutions, copy and paste the following link to the PDF into your browser, and if you have enough paper, ink, and motivation, print it out.

http://www.buhla.de/Foto/batt-adapt-US.pdf
 
I believe some cameras can be recalibrated for use with a silver oxide cell without the need for installation of a diode. DAG has done this for me with Leicaflexes.

The Spotmatics prior to the Spotmatic F had metering circuitry that was indifferent to battery voltage. This might present an interesting option if one is considering a new acquisition; not too shabby an alternative.
 
I think the Wein cells are for people with more money than sense, as they cost about 20-30 times as much as standard zinc air cells. They are smaller in diameter, but a strip of cardboard or an O-ring fixes that.
 
I can still buy a battery that fits my Spotmatic but my 35RC had to be 'fixed.' I wonder sometimes is Lithium batteries are just as toxic as the Mercury.

Alkaline batteries have slow dying voltage curve which may or may not effect a meter but they don't last very long on my Pentax 6x7.

The Zinc-Air batteries work great on my Konica C35 without any 'fix.' And even with the negative reports of short battery life they don't seem too bad in the above camera.

Some of the button and short batteries seem to be pretty expensive for how long they last especially on auto wind, auto focus, auto rewind cameras.

I have two Pentax Pn3(s) that uses two button batteries; one set lasted over 15 years, and I only changed them because I was going on a trip with it.
 
I have saved the washers from the various Wein cells I've had over the years, so that I could use a 675 zinc-air battery for a camera that takes 625 size. Results are mixed -- the washers generally do not fit snugly enough around the 675 to make the connection properly. For some cameras you just need a spacer to make sure the 675 doesn't shift around, but where the positive terminal is supposed to contact the side of the battery (Nikkormat FTn for instance), there can be a problem.
 
I wonder sometimes is Lithium batteries are just as toxic as the Mercury.
No.

I have saved the washers from the various Wein cells I've had over the years, so that I could use a 675 zinc-air battery for a camera that takes 625 size. Results are mixed -- the washers generally do not fit snugly enough around the 675 to make the connection properly. For some cameras you just need a spacer to make sure the 675 doesn't shift around, but where the positive terminal is supposed to contact the side of the battery (Nikkormat FTn for instance), there can be a problem.
Ah I wasn't aware of cameras that make contact at the side of the battery, even though I briefly had a Nikkormat FTn. That sure requires a little more tinkering.
 
Pretty but (mostly) useless, cheap size adapters like these let you put smaller batteries in bigger battery compartments
but they don't alter the voltage.

Not so!

I have some that work perfectly to adapt a very cheap 675 hearing aid battery to power cameras originally designed for 625 cells.

Chris
 
I believe some cameras can be recalibrated for use with a silver oxide cell without the need for installation of a diode. DAG has done this for me with Leicaflexes.

The Spotmatics prior to the Spotmatic F had metering circuitry that was indifferent to battery voltage. This might present an interesting option if one is considering a new acquisition; not too shabby an alternative.

I haven't been able to find silver oxide batteries recently. Are they still around and if so where?
 
Depends what size. I think the 357 is silver oxide -- this is the same size and voltage as the SR44; fits the Minolta CLE, Nikkormat FT2/3 for example. But if you mean silver oxide 625s, I don't think those ever existed.
 
I tried a wein cells in a yashica mat 124g, it lasted a few minutes, though I'm not sure if I left the battery out of the packet for 1/2 an hour first like it seems you're supposed to.

I also tried a wein cell in my ricoh 500gx, it lasted 1/2 of a 36 exp film. I now use a modern battery I got from the small battery company and the readings seem to compare well enough with my gossen variosix f and the pics come out alright.

So I wouldn't recommend wein cells.
 
I tried a wein cells in a yashica mat 124g, it lasted a few minutes, though I'm not sure if I left the battery out of the packet for 1/2 an hour first like it seems you're supposed to.

I also tried a wein cell in my ricoh 500gx, it lasted 1/2 of a 36 exp film. I now use a modern battery I got from the small battery company and the readings seem to compare well enough with my gossen variosix f and the pics come out alright.

So I wouldn't recommend wein cells.

Counterpoint. I've gotten weeks of use out of a wein cell in my old Canon F-1.

Jim B.
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/MR9-MR-9-P...083632?hash=item1e6b1d0830:g:hkIAAOxykMpTHFbQ

These are somewhat less expensive than the Kanto MR-9 adapters, and have seemed the same to me, functionally. I use several of these. The Wein cells just don’t last long enough, though perhaps it’s that I don’t get around to using some cameras often enough and the ones with Wein cells in them are always dead. The 386 cells in adapters work well though.
Rewiring the cameras is probably the best idea as long as you remember which cameras were rewired and don’t need adapters, and which were not rewired and do need adapters.
Which was something I could never remember without the help of a label.
 
But if you mean silver oxide 625s, I don't think those ever existed.

Actually, there used to be an exact size replacement S625PX 1.5 volt silver oxide battery, but they disappeared from the market a few years ago. I used them in my voltage-corrected Leica M5:
https://www.smallbattery.company.org.uk/sbc_s625px.htm
https://www.batteryjunction.com/exell-s625px.html

I think I have one more of those S625PX batteries, but once that's done, I plan to use a "dumb" non-voltage reducing brass adapter with a SR44 sized silver oxide battery. I bought mine from DAG, but you can also find them on the Big Auction site:
https://www.dagcamera.com/store/p461/Battery_Adapter_for_325-A_Battery.html
 
The silver oxide battery is 1.5V. The mercury battery was 1.35V. So the silver oxide is .15V too high in voltage. A germanium diode drops 0.3V. 1.5V - 0.3V = 1.2V, which is then .15V lower than a silver oxide. Same error, opposite direction.

The Schottky diode drops 0.25V, leaving 1.25V when used with a silver oxide battery. That's a little better, but still off.

If the Wein cell really is 1.35V, it must be the most accurate substitute.
 
What is the practical difference between 1.5v silver oxide and 1.35 mercury? A quarter of a stop in meter reading? As the silver oxide wear out the voltage drops anyway doesn’t it? Can’t we manually set the iso to compensate?
 
It used to be fairly common to see articles on replacement batteries for cameras and camera equipment. Seems not so any more.

Thanks for this article and the comments and links it has generated.
 
The silver oxide battery is 1.5V. The mercury battery was 1.35V. So the silver oxide is .15V too high in voltage. A germanium diode drops 0.3V. 1.5V - 0.3V = 1.2V, which is then .15V lower than a silver oxide. Same error, opposite direction.

The Schottky diode drops 0.25V, leaving 1.25V when used with a silver oxide battery. That's a little better, but still off.

If the Wein cell really is 1.35V, it must be the most accurate substitute.
Unfortunately, that's over-simplistic. All diode types have a forward voltage drop that depends on the example and on the current flow, which in a camera metering circuit alone is generally quite low. Shottky diodes, for instance can vary from about 0.15V to over 1V. P-N diodes vary less, typically 0.6-0.7V at lower currents. Germanium also varies. Net result, no diode provides a predictable voltage-drop without experiment. There is also the problem of the reduced voltage also varying because the chosen cell ages or becomes depleted.


How much any of this matters is variable, depending on the cell chosen, the diode chosen and the meter circuit. The Spotmatics are well-known for having a bridge circuit that is insensitive to voltage, but only at the null point, i.e. when the meter is centred at correct exposure. Once off-centre, the "error" deflection IS voltage-dependent, although that's not usually important.


Agreed that the correct-voltage battery is highly desirable IF the meter is not designed or adjusted to compensate.
 
What is the practical difference between 1.5v silver oxide and 1.35 mercury? A quarter of a stop in meter reading? As the silver oxide wear out the voltage drops anyway doesn’t it? Can’t we manually set the iso to compensate?

I've always set the film speed at half the rated value and have gotten fine results. Thus, for 400 speed film, set the meter to 200 to compensate, for example.
 
Back
Top