greyelm
Malcolm
GF1 + 45-200mm
photony texas
Light Sensitive
M9 and .95 Noctilux freaking out...
photony texas
Light Sensitive
Summitar @ Peace
armanius
Member
armanius
Member
Richard G
Mentor
Oldskewl808
Established
Minolta SRT101 with 28mm macro @ f4.
Richard G
Mentor
goamules
Well-known
Canon 135/3.5 RF lens.
Greyscale
Mentor
Yashica TL Electro X, Yashinon DS-M 50/1.7
021_21A by Greyscale3, on Flickr
Yashica TL Electro X, Yashinon DX 50/1.7
021_021 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
048_048 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
017_9 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
022_4 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
022_022 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
021_21A by Greyscale3, on Flickr
Yashica TL Electro X, Yashinon DX 50/1.7
021_021 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
048_048 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
017_9 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
022_4 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
022_022 by Greyscale3, on Flickr
Greyscale
Mentor
Jack Conrad
Well-known
Taken with a Pentacon 50/1.8 on an Oly E-520
Dirk
Privatier
Quite magical. Nice.
Dirk
Privatier
Hows this? -------------All Bokeh
DSC01321a1 by yoyomaoz, on Flickr
A Canon 58mm f1.2 mounted on a Sony NEX 5.
Beautiful.
A reminder that lens info is essential to this thread, and also the aperture used if available. This is not a words/no words thread; it is in the Optics and Lenses forum. So the ability to associate the picture appearance to the lens that produced it is the main point. 
Also, if your post uses a link to your picture located elsewhere, such as Flikr or PhotoBucket, and you later remove the photo from that source, that will break the link to the pic here, upsetting the flow of interaction for anyone looking back through the thread, with blank gaps where the pics once appeared.
Also, if your post uses a link to your picture located elsewhere, such as Flikr or PhotoBucket, and you later remove the photo from that source, that will break the link to the pic here, upsetting the flow of interaction for anyone looking back through the thread, with blank gaps where the pics once appeared.
Jack Conrad
Well-known
Doug, is there a remedy for this broken link problem?
I think the only solution is to avoid having the linked pic removed from the source. The break can happen inadvertently if the photo host deletes your pics or goes off-line.
Less likely if you have more control... for instance, your own web site or your area on a reliable hosting service (but even so if you delete the pic it will leave a blank spot wherever you linked it). Probably the safest is if you upload the pic from your own hard drive, then it's saved on RFF, pretty secure from deletion. (Max size is 600 pixels on the long side, scaled down automatically if larger.) In that case, it will show up in the thread as a small thumbnail that expands when clicked. It's possible at that point to "Go Advanced" again, editing your post, expand the pic in a new window, and drag it back to the same post to appear in the 600px size above the thumbnail.
Also better if your hosting source is on the same website as the destination... like posting a pic on an RFF forum from your RFF Gallery; if it all goes down nobody will notice little gaps in the threads!
ferider
Mentor
Cool to see this thread so alive and well.
Olympus OM 180/2.8, maybe at f5.6 or so:
Roland.
Olympus OM 180/2.8, maybe at f5.6 or so:
Roland.
menos
Mentor
same light - different lenses, 29 years apart.
Fastest Leitz 35mm wide angle lens from 1938 − 3.5cm ƒ3.5 Elmar uncoated:
Fastest Leitz 35mm wide angle lens from 1967 − 35mm Summilux v2 infinity lock:
Roland, I didn't use your 90 Elmarit yet - this will be one of the upcoming lenses, to shoot extensively ;-)
Fastest Leitz 35mm wide angle lens from 1938 − 3.5cm ƒ3.5 Elmar uncoated:
Fastest Leitz 35mm wide angle lens from 1967 − 35mm Summilux v2 infinity lock:
Roland, I didn't use your 90 Elmarit yet - this will be one of the upcoming lenses, to shoot extensively ;-)
menos
Mentor
And just, to add the Noctilux ƒ1 wide open:
