ferider
Mentor
Same boring scene taken with X100s (1/500, f5.6) and M240 with VM Ultron 35/1.7 (1/250, f8), both at ASA 200. Naked Fuji (no filter), UV/IR filter on the Ultron - because this is how I shoot the two. I shot at different apertures to make the DOF equivalent. Focus is on the center fork of the tree.
Raw files imported into LR, exported as TIF without any changes. Then straightened the horizon, slight crop (my Ultron is actually a 37mm lens), and resized to 2000 pixel max. width.
Which is which ? (click on picture if you want to see enlarged)
Roland.
Raw files imported into LR, exported as TIF without any changes. Then straightened the horizon, slight crop (my Ultron is actually a 37mm lens), and resized to 2000 pixel max. width.
Which is which ? (click on picture if you want to see enlarged)
Roland.
bob338
Well-known
I don't have an M240, but the second one looks like the Fuji to me.
Hsg
who dares wins
The first one is Leica M240.
Darthfeeble
But you can call me Steve
I voted for the 240 as the first. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if I was wrong. Thinking slightly better detail in the first as a result of full frame vs. Crop.
shawn
Mentor
How as WB set? If both are 'as shot' can you set them both to Daylight? Sorta looks like WB differed between the two (looking at cloud) which would also alter the colors somewhat.
Thanks,
Shawn
Thanks,
Shawn
shawn
Mentor
I voted for the 240 as the first. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if I was wrong. Thinking slightly better detail in the first as a result of full frame vs. Crop.
It is always interesting to see everyones different interpretations on shots like these. To me the second looks sharper and more detailed.
Shawn
dotur
od karnevala
Remembering the similar crazy yellow accent of my late M8, I'd say the second one is 240...
tomtofa
Well-known
I voted #2 as the 240 because of the warmer color, but the field of view of #2 seems to be wider, which makes me think it could be the x100, which is a little wider than 35mm as I recall. Or am I thinking of the RX1?
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Well, what this is evaluating is essentially the difference in raw file format interpretation (and perhaps in scaling from 16MP or 24MP to 3MP). Not much of the cameras left there, apart from the variation in white balance bias.
G Dogg
Established
I have both of these cameras as well. What a testament to the progress the sensors have made, and the fuji as a cropped sensor compared to the full frame. You could have put either one up alone, and stated they were shot with....XXX...and without any comparator, we would appreciate the image.
xenohip
Established
Judging by the manner in which foliage turns to fuzz (left side of the picture), I'll say the first is the X100s.
The color representation in the second photograph is not appealing, IMHO, but what do I know-- I'm a B&W guy....
The color representation in the second photograph is not appealing, IMHO, but what do I know-- I'm a B&W guy....
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I'll go with the second image being the 240 because of the slightly warmer tones ... the 240's WB has this tendency IMO. And there is a little more detail in the second shot to my old eyes which indicates a slightly better lens and larger sensor.
anerjee
Well-known
I voted that the second one is 240. To be clear, I have no idea why.
mwooten
light user
What kind of tree is that?
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
The second is definitely the superior image IMO and I will be mightily disappointed if that turns out to be the Fuji.
Bille
Well-known
Second looks better for sure. FWIW.
BillBingham2
Registered User
Nbr 2 seems sharper in some fine detail (e.g. top of telephone pole, leaves in bottom right).
Don't have enough knowledge about either to say, but as it's caucus time here in Iowa, I'm going with Nbr 2 being the Leica/Ultron combo.
B2 (;->
Don't have enough knowledge about either to say, but as it's caucus time here in Iowa, I'm going with Nbr 2 being the Leica/Ultron combo.
B2 (;->
shimokita
白黒
My selection is that the Fuji X100s is number 01 and the Leica (Typ 240) is number 02... the Leica 240 as it's a bit darker directly out of the camera. I ignore the 1.4% difference in data size.
However it turns out, for anyone who only posts on the web, the Fuji may be a "good" choice.
Casey
However it turns out, for anyone who only posts on the web, the Fuji may be a "good" choice.
Casey
Steveh
Well-known
I'm guessing Fuji number 1, Leica number 2 as well, mainly from the warmer colours and greater (apparent?) sharpness in 2
ferider
Mentor
Don't have enough knowledge about either to say, but as it's caucus time here in Iowa, I'm going with Nbr 2 being the Leica/Ultron combo.
And just like it will happen in Iowa, it appears the vote is changing depending on who posts what in the thread, Bill (= exit poll)
Both cameras were shot with Auto WB. You all carry on ...
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.