bwcolor
Mentor
Take a look at this thread
Just for clarification... We knew this was coming and I'm assuming that February will be the announcement.. I can't imagine that it would launch in February.
Just for clarification... We knew this was coming and I'm assuming that February will be the announcement.. I can't imagine that it would launch in February.
Last edited:
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Are we really discussing a mobile phone snapshot of a PowerPoint slide announcing the announcement of a camera that we knew would be announced?
ScottAlexander
Street Photographer
Fuji would be smart to make it a full frame, or 1.3 crop camera.. if you're going to take on the Leica X1 with the X100 by name and usability, might as well go for broke.
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Yeah, I guess the about three people who want to use their existing Leica lenses, as opposed to buying your new Fuji lenses, are a really useful group to cater to when deciding to make your camera three times more expensive and your lenses two times bigger because of the extra large sensor.
back alley
IMAGES
in a bad mood tonight?
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
back alley
IMAGES
It's morning here
ah, that's changes everything!
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
bwcolor
Mentor
pvdhaar
Peter
Must say that I'm curious about how Fuji will morph the X100 into an interchangeable lens camera. Especially because of the potential parallels with the Konica Hexar to Hexar-RF transition.
The original fixed lens auto focus Hexar was so well thought out, such a marvelous integration of functions and photographic concepts that it was nothing short of perfect. Everything was tuned to that splendid 35/2 lens. On the RF, the interchangeability aspect spoilt all that.. the finder had to be multi-purpose, the tuning of functions to lens was lost, and worst, most of the brightest ideas behind the AF-Hexar were ditched. This included the aperture-preference approach in P-mode, that flash and ambient in a single shot could be made at two different apertures, automatic focus compensation for infra-red film, the list goes on and on.. Good as it is as an autoexposure rangefinder, the Hexar-RF is miles behind the original AF-Hexar, and as far as I can see spelled the end of Konica as a camera company.
One can only hope that Fuji does things differently.. Keep the good things of the X100 in, and most of all, a proprietary lens mount that allows all the same functions and integration as its predecessor.
The original fixed lens auto focus Hexar was so well thought out, such a marvelous integration of functions and photographic concepts that it was nothing short of perfect. Everything was tuned to that splendid 35/2 lens. On the RF, the interchangeability aspect spoilt all that.. the finder had to be multi-purpose, the tuning of functions to lens was lost, and worst, most of the brightest ideas behind the AF-Hexar were ditched. This included the aperture-preference approach in P-mode, that flash and ambient in a single shot could be made at two different apertures, automatic focus compensation for infra-red film, the list goes on and on.. Good as it is as an autoexposure rangefinder, the Hexar-RF is miles behind the original AF-Hexar, and as far as I can see spelled the end of Konica as a camera company.
One can only hope that Fuji does things differently.. Keep the good things of the X100 in, and most of all, a proprietary lens mount that allows all the same functions and integration as its predecessor.
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
Hmpf.
It's going to be DLSR-shaped again (equals pear-shaped in my POV).
Forget about it.
It's going to be DLSR-shaped again (equals pear-shaped in my POV).
Forget about it.
Roger Hicks
Mentor
btgc
Mentor
Who is buying all those new cameras and systems?
gavinlg
Mentor
Even when their interchangeable lens camera comes out, I won't change from my x100 - all I need is a good 35mm f2. Everything else is just noise!
Sparrow
Mentor
Who is buying all those new cameras and systems?
... people who's x100's have just become obsolete?
gavinlg
Mentor
How is it obsolete? The x100 is special in that the sensor and lens are both perfectly tuned to one another. The viewfinder is only for the 35mm lens, and therefore is fantastic too look through - big and bright with just the right amount of space around the frame lines . Interchangeable lenses would mean that the viewfinder would be compromised - possibly just no optical finder, only an EVF. On the x100, the EVF is rubbish compared to the OVF. It would mean that a similar 35mm f2 fujinon lens would be much bigger (on the x100 the lens unit goes very far into the body - specially for that particular sensor), and possibly not as optically good.
There are more things too - more compromises that are to be made when you have interchangeable lenses. As I said before, I would still be using my x100 despite the interchangeable system, unless they can avoid all these compromises - which is doubtful.
kbg32
neo-romanticist
It won't be full frame sensor that's for sure.
I don't think I can survive another viral marketing campaign.
Personally, I refuse to buy another new camera until a manufacturer designs one that comes with a talented attractive female photographer to take my photos for me.
Personally, I refuse to buy another new camera until a manufacturer designs one that comes with a talented attractive female photographer to take my photos for me.
