Tuolumne
Mentor
yanidel
Well-known
Maybe I am crazy ...
Starting above the right eye is a purple vertical line followed by a 3 or 4 other ones on top of the hair. I saw it on two out of three screens I own. Very thin though, could be light ray effect, jpg artefacts or very probably my tired mind.
tomasis
Well-known
indeed, banding starts show at iso 3200 and higher. I haven't found any fast way to fix this in Photoshop yet but it is fixable, I believe. It is maybe difficult see at colors, but at BW it is easy to see.
Tuolumne
Mentor
I confess - I don't see any banding in either the posted shot or the original at 1:1. I even converted it to B&W and still couldn't see any banding. Perhaps I just don't have a critical enough eye.
/T
/T
Tuolumne
Mentor
I confess - I don't see any banding in either the posted shot or the original at 1:1. I even converted it to B&W and still couldn't see any banding. Perhaps I just don't have a critical enough eye.
/T
/T
Mattikk
Well-known
I haven't tried eighter yet, but it seems that the Epson is more what I'm looking for.
I just can't afford M8 and it seems that the R-D1 has features more appealing to me and I might even buy one soon.
I just can't afford M8 and it seems that the R-D1 has features more appealing to me and I might even buy one soon.
Mattikk
Well-known
I tried the M8 yesterday at a shop. I like the tank-like build, but I think it's a little too heavy, how heavy is the R-D1?
I didn't feel comfortable holding the M8 and to me, that's more important than the image quality.
I didn't feel comfortable holding the M8 and to me, that's more important than the image quality.
tomasis
Well-known
I think it is about same. Larger difference is price
Uwe_Nds
Chief Assistant Driver
Actually, the R-D1 is heavier than the M8 (590 g vs. 545 g each w/o battery).
Best regards,
Uwe
Carlitos
Member
I don't think there is any question that the RD-1 is superior to the M8 in form and fit. It's pleasing to the eyes, ergonomically; it is just the right weight, a joy to hold and use all day. Most controls are at the fingertips, and the only issue may be getting used to the idea that a digital camera needs to have the shutter cocked with each use. I don't mind it.
Mattikk
Well-known
Recently I've started to lean towards Leica. It's confusing with these two cameras. Damn I wish I could get one.
mountainrivera
Established
M8
M8
I owned the RD-1 and sold it a ways back. Recently I was fortunate enough to be able to afford the M8. I vote for the m8 if you do not factor in cost. The reason is that I was always living in constant fear of the RF becoming mis aligned. It was never perfect even though i fiddled with it which was livable but did bug me.
M8
I owned the RD-1 and sold it a ways back. Recently I was fortunate enough to be able to afford the M8. I vote for the m8 if you do not factor in cost. The reason is that I was always living in constant fear of the RF becoming mis aligned. It was never perfect even though i fiddled with it which was livable but did bug me.
kshapero
South Florida Man
And the M8 never gets misaligned?
louisb
Well-known
I've had both and I kept the M8. The R-D1 is an excellent camera. I only wish Epson had decided to keep manufacturing it. It was quirky but the sensitivity in low light was outstanding and a lot less noisy than the M8. If it was still manufactured and supported, without hesitation I would have kept using it.
But, truth is, I did not want to be beholden to a camera which if it broke down would be nearly impossible to service. My investment in Leica glass was significant and I decided to protect the investment by moving to a camera which will be supported indefinitely: the M8.
LouisB
But, truth is, I did not want to be beholden to a camera which if it broke down would be nearly impossible to service. My investment in Leica glass was significant and I decided to protect the investment by moving to a camera which will be supported indefinitely: the M8.
LouisB
35mmdelux
#Represent
And with all its documented problems, the M8 will need a lot of support. When these problems are corrected with the M9 I may consider buying one.
Meantime my new R-D1s will cover these requirements.
yanidel
Well-known
Product support will not save your investment as obsolescence will destroy it in a few years.
Carlitos
Member
I’m really glad some people continue to take shots at the little orphaned, obsolete R-D1. If most people on this forum actually auditioned it, and were truly confident it would continue to be repairable for at least 5+ years, it might actually be going for more than the M8!
yanidel
Well-known
Yep, I wonder what would have happened if the RD1 had been launched by Leica. Ergonomically, it is closer to Leica's older models.
tomasis
Well-known
what do you mean leica's older models? do you mean M5 nothing else? If I compare Rd1 to DSLR, it appears much like as a leica but if I do compare rd1 to analog M and it feels suddenly big, both at height and thickness. As I said above, it is not a problem for me. If you thought about comparison to M8, it is understandable.
I actually believe that Leica wouldnt choose swiwel LCD door if it make the body thicker. But a budget model would be nice
Striped of many features etc.
Last edited:
cam
the need for speed
but the R-D1 is repairable for at least 5+ years -- Steve's Camera so that should be a non-issue.
(btw, i love cocking the shutter
)