For less than $2K, you can have a prototype Leica M with a Summaron lens

In China, the official definition for 3 no products:

A product with questionable quality that has no expiry date, no quality certificate and no mention of manufacturer.​

A product with 3 no’s (no expiry date, no authorization for production by the relevant authorities and no mention of manufacturer). 😊​

 
Last edited:
Are we sure they put glass elements into the lens group or just plastic one? If one manufacturer can do it at this price, why LLL charge 10x?
 
ddutchison2 said:
I'd post a $5 best offer, but the shipping is $36USD which I wouldn't want to pay if I "won".
Click to expand...

I'd like to have one of these too – for novelty value if nothing else. Unfortunately shipping to the UK is even more expensive, and there's always the chance it would be intercepted and destroyed by customs officials... :eek:
 
Duofold RF said:
Are we sure they put glass elements into the lens group or just plastic one? If one manufacturer can do it at this price, why LLL charge 10x?
Click to expand...
I suppose I could strip one down to check for plastic use, but I did that to the family telephone when I was 7 and finished up with a piece left over (it did still work!).

More practically, why do Leica charge so much? Zeiss and these manufacturers are producing their own lens designs at much lower cost - except LLL who are producing replica copies. I’m not about to say suggest there isn’t value in Leica or assume that Chinese lenses are inherently poor or poor value. They each reflect many aspects of their production process, volume, market and volume expectations.

This lens is currently being sold for a little over half what it cost a year or so ago, presumably because it’s now been replaced with an updated and more ‘branded’ version. The new one actually has ‘almost unchanged’ optics but a new casing and, claimed, improved precision.

This is an interesting comparison of the formulae of the Mr Ding and some other similar lenses - Brian, would be interested in your comments on these?

IMG_3405.jpeg
 
The 7 Artisans is a Sonnar, and is very close in design to the Zunow 5cm F1.1 v2 of the mid 1950s. The Glass Filler for the middle group is made unnecessary through the use of modern coatings. The price: same that the Zunow sold for when it was new.

The Mr. Ding, Voigtlander Nokton 50/1.1, and Leica 50/1 Noctilux look like variations on the 1950s Voigtlander Ultron design, originally a 6 element in 5 group also used by Minolta in to 50/1.8 LTM lens, Leica in the v2 Rigid Summicron of the 1960s, Nikon in the 50/1.8, and others. The rear element of the Nokton and Summilux is split into two elements of lesser power, making them 7 elements in 6 groups. The Mr. Ding lens takes it one further, and splits the rear element of an Ultron into a doublet and singlet for a 1-1-1-1-2-2-1 8 element in 6 group design. These three lenses can trace their roots to the Voigtlander Ultron of the early 1950s.
 
Sonnar Brian said:
The 7 Artisans is a Sonnar, and is very close in design to the Zunow 5cm F1.1 v2 of the mid 1950s. The Glass Filler for the middle group is made unnecessary through the use of modern coatings. The price: same that the Zunow sold for when it was new.

The Mr. Ding, Voigtlander Nokton 50/1.1, and Leica 50/1 Noctilux look like variations on the 1950s Voigtlander Ultron design, originally a 6 element in 5 group also used by Minolta in to 50/1.8 LTM lens, Leica in the v2 Rigid Summicron of the 1960s, Nikon in the 50/1.8, and others. The rear element of the Nokton and Summilux is split into two elements of lesser power, making them 7 elements in 6 groups. The Mr. Ding lens takes it one further, and splits the rear element of an Ultron into a doublet and singlet for a 1-1-1-1-2-2-1 8 element in 6 group design. These three lenses can trace their roots to the Voigtlander Ultron of the early 1950s.
Click to expand...
Thanks Brian, that’s interesting.

And for more, off topic content, I tried a new calibration rig this evening - one of the pleasures of the Chinese lens model:)

IMG_3407.jpeg

Ground glass on the film plane and live view on the S1r, with a suitable focus target


IMG_3408.jpeg

50g metal and 20g split phenidone;) - later replaced by a printed rule.

Checked one Syoptic and it was pretty good in fact, adjusted 7art 50/1.1 to remove back focus, checked C-Sonnar to confirm it’s spot on at 1.5, and struggled a bit with the 7art 75/1.25.

The 75 is very useable as is, even from 1m, but would benefit from being the focus forward about an inch. Brian, I know you have one - is the adjustment the same as for the ramped cam variants - turning the flat cam in the 75 doesn’t seem to affect focus (perhaps obviously!)

Mike


Edited to admit that I have something a bit like Raid’s ‘problem’ with 50s, although maybe not to quite the same extent:)
 
The 75/1.25: the Flat Cam (not indexed) turns in a very fine thread, so adjustment is the same. I have mine spot-on with the M9, took some doing.
 
The artisans' adjustable focus cam is innovation, but in other way, to compensate poor QC. If this eBay seller use the phase like Leica M prototype replica, may attract buyers to shell out $2K to own s special piece that too rare even Leica does not have it.
 
I appreciate the adjustable cams on these lenses, a brilliant idea- all RF lenses should have this feature.

My M9, M8, and M Monochrom- new, did not agree on focus. My 50/1.1 Nokton and 35/1.2 Nokton both required a layer of copper tape to focus properly on the M9. My M9 agrees with many others. My M240 disagreed with the M9, M8, and M Monochrom. I adjusted the M8 and M240 to agree with the M9, left the m Monochrom alone as I have a set of lenses adjusted to work with it wide-open with a Y48 and deeper filter. I adjusted the second 7art 50/1.1 to use with the M Monochrom with the Y48, and the first was perfect on the M9.

If all Leica cameras agreed with each other, calibrating lenses would be easily done. Kept me busy for years.
 
Sonnar Brian said:
If all Leica cameras agreed with each other, calibrating lenses would be easily done. Kept me busy for years.
Click to expand...

The myth of Leica quality - I’ll calibrate on the black MA and then check on the M4, chrome MA and Ikon… of course, no problem with an MDa:)

Fortunately, I suspect film is, mostly, a bit more forgiving than digital
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top