FTn Paint

1750Shooter

1750Shooter

Established
Local time
10:12 PM
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Messages
191
Just got back my Ftn that had been on long-term loan to my brother ("let me borrow it for a couple of weeks...now 27 years later) & it's really brassed badly & needs a new cover. I'll get the cover from Cameraleather, but have never painted a camera. Has anyone? Or does anyone have any suggestions on how to do it? Thanks in advance. I'll post pictures when/if I get it done.
 
Not worth the effort for a Nikkormat. It was a common camera. Besides new covering and the effort of the painting there is some question about the efficacy of using modern batteries and the non-Ai lenses have been superceded by the Ai-S quality. If you want a manual Nikon save you money and get the F3HP which is a far better user.
 
Steve Bellayr said:
It was a common camera. Besides new covering and the effort of the painting there is some question about the efficacy of using modern batteries and the non-Ai lenses have been superceded by the Ai-S quality.
Click to expand...

Right, let me get this straight, all photographs made before Ai-S are now superceded? I've heard of developments in technology allowing for new discoveries, but even in science they rarely trash the tried and tested older discoveries. Its a shame because some great photographers made their names using non-Ai-s lenses????

As for re-painting your otherwise :rolleyes: excellent Nikkormat have a look in the Leica film forum for tips on repainting bodies and the types of paint to use.

Steve
 
in all honesty, I'd probably keep it! It's kinda cool if you think about it: the camera has your brother's mark on it!

Though if you're set on repainting it, I suppose you'd have to strip the paint, disassemble the camera, prime the body, spray a new coat, then re-assemble and re-align the camera. At least thats what I've gathered from the re-paint projects I've seen here
 
1. take off all chrome parts
2. use muriatic acid strip off chrome
3. stripe off nickle (go to gunsmith)
4. dip into muriatic acid again, wash clean dry
4. use automobile lacquer paint
 
Nikkormats have a feel to them. The feel of the film advance. The short firm stroke. The sound of the shutter. Really nice slr. Simple rugged machine, but really well made.

I like!!!

And I love pre AI-S.
 
Peter_Jones said:
I thought many Ai-S lenses were optically the same as the pre-Ai equivalent ?
Click to expand...
Ai lenses replaced the non- AI lenses and at first many were the same lens with the new mount. Over time, as with all things, new improved versions came out. Lenses got better because computers took over both the computational and manufacturing aspects of lens production. Of course this was offset by the desire to make lenses cheaper. The Ai-s lenses were the last incarnation, where the mount had a slight modification for the Nikon FA (?).

Personally, the non-Ai lens, for the most part are excellent lenses.
 
Having used both the non-Ai and Ai-S lenses I found that the Ai-S lenses to perform better. This does not mean that the non-Ai lenses were bad just that their replacements were better.
 
A brassed camera is a thing of beauty. Replace the cover if you need to, but I'd let the brass show. It's a sign of maturity, like wrinkles.
 
Funny, but the best lenses I've ever owned were made WAY before computers were involved in their designs. Just because something is newer, well..... how are you going to "improve" on a Summicron DR or a Heliar, to name just two?

If it were me, I'd recover the camera and just touch up any paint surfaces. I've only owned one Nikkormat, the same model you have, and really regret selling it. My 50 2.0 and 105 2.5 non AIS lenses were fantastic, and the camera was wonderful to use. No problems getting correct batteries, and the sound of that shutter was beautiful. Oh, it was big and heavy, but really felt like a well made camera.
 
Send us a picture or two and we (in our - ahem - infinite wisdom) will decide if it needs re-covering or repainting. Does it really need new covering? The stuff Nikon used for these was really tough -- maybe all it needs is gluing of the edges, and cleaning?

As for the lenses, it's true that Nikon, like everyone else, worked steadily at improving their lenses, what with recomputed designs and improved coatings. But the pre-AI Nikkor lenses were what gave Nikon its reputation, and they measure up quite well, even today. Really the only lens from that era that seems to have a bad reputation is the 43-86/3.5, but Nikon did redesign that, and later versions are fine lenses. Search places link Nikonlinks.com and you'll see several different lens reviews of the range of Nikkors.
 
brassed Nikons

brassed Nikons

I bought a couple of black Fs in '72 and still shoot with them. You would say they are "badly" brassed. I say they earned every nick and dent. They are a chronicle of my photographic life and "nicely" brassed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top