Leica Summaron 35mm f/2.8 - Post your pics

[aadi]

This is great. For me the SUMMARON magic is shining here

Thanks!

Here's another frame from the same roll;

Leica M3 / Summaron 35mm 2.8 / T-Max 100 / T-Max Dev. 1+4

 

[Ko.Fe.]

why not post here as long as its labeled... 3.5 :angel:

Considering price of 3.5 to be so low, it is like cheating


With goggled Summaron 35 3.5. by Ko.Fe., on Flickr

 

[Bingley]

The tiny size of the 3.5 makes it an easy carry for suburban walks. The three below are on TMax 400 @ iso 500 in Diafine, with a yellow filter.

Sunday morning walk by bingley0522, on Flickr

 

[Bingley]

Sunnyvale by bingley0522, on Flickr

 

[Bingley]

Starbucks by bingley0522, on Flickr

 

[maddoc]

M3, Tmax400 @ 1600

201502-18-M3-TMY400-1600-SUMMAR-SUMMARON-06copy by maddoc2003jp, on Flickr

M7, Tmax400 @1600

201502-13-M7-TMY402-1600-SUMMARON-06 copy by maddoc2003jp, on Flickr

 

[Ko.Fe.]

35 3.5 goggled.


St. Paddy's happiness takes over Black Friday. by Ko.Fe., on Flickr

 

[Ko.Fe.]

35 3.5 goggled.

Can you feel it... by Ko.Fe., on Flickr

 

[Bingley]

35/3.5 LTM:


Halftime by bingley0522, on Flickr

 

[Bingley]

35/3.5 LTM:


After the game by bingley0522, on Flickr

 

[aadi]

M3 / Tri-X / Summaron 2.8 Goggled


Untitled - Montreal, 2015 by Aadi Salman, on Flickr

 

[Ko.Fe.]

35 3.5 goggled.


"The guess who" were here and"the who"; I took them home.
by Ko.Fe., on Flickr

 

[asilda]

Love the feel of this shot!

 

[Dektol Dan]

There Is No End From Here

There Is No End From Here

The Summaron has been, and still is, my first choice for 35.

Monochrom:

 

[Ko.Fe.]

Is it possible to add 3.5 in the name of this thread. Please?

3.5 goggled.


At the brewers. by Ko.Fe., on Flickr

Cheers, Ko.

 

[mfogiel]

20147517 by mfogiel, on Flickr

 

[stephen.w]

20147517 by mfogiel, on Flickr

Wonderful shot.

 

[Pete B]

Is it possible to add 3.5 in the name of this thread. Please?



Cheers, Ko.

I'd like to see a separate 3.5 thread with shots like that. I think the 3.5 is often overlooked. I'd like to see what people do with theirs.
Pete

 

[Vobluda]

Not that I am the one to decide but I find 3.5 photos here trolling and that 3.5 photos has nothing to do in this thread as 2.8 has specific character and this is thread about 2.8.

Is it possible to add 3.5 in the name of this thread. Please?

3.5 goggled.

At the brewers. by Ko.Fe., on Flickr

Cheers, Ko.

 

[stephen.w]

Not that I am the one to decide but I find 3.5 photos here trolling and that 3.5 photos has nothing to do in this thread as 2.8 has specific character and this is thread about 2.8.

The 2.8 is a compact and sharp (particularly considering its age) moderate wide angle lens. I must must say I do not see any strong signature in the shots taken above (many of which are nevertheless very impressive).

With regard to the 3.5, unfortunately for me its "character" was made up of central veiling flare and significant softness and reduced contrast when shot wide open.