Olympus Pen FT

Olympus Pen FT, Zuiko 40mm f/1.4, Tmax100.

Erik.

14079485092_f3a5dde405_c.jpg
 
Fine work Erik, both technical and aesthetic.

I notice a thin black line around the prints. Did you clearance the negative holder to be able to print out to the edge of the frame?
 
Bah and humbug.

Got my film back and it looks okay but the Pen F is just not my cup of tea. It simply isn't a natural (?) fit for me. With my Lecia 1 and Minox III I just grab, shoot, and sto. I guess it just feels fiddly to me. But damn, it's a nice camera. Perhaps I'll use it a bit more and see if it becomes a more natural fit, if not I'll simply continue to enjoy Erik's and Sonnar2's and everyone else's photographs.
 
Just checked this thread for the first time. Erik, you are absolutely among the best photographers here on RFF. What you get out of these half frames is stunning!
I have an Agfa half frame somewhere and you made me want to dig it up and try shooting it again.
 
Lovely photos, Erik! Your photos show the Pen F remains a camera capable of producing excellent work.

I've had a couple of them over the years, always intrigued to acquire another but I resist—I have too many cameras already.

G
 
I still enjoy shooting a roll through my Pen-FV once in a while. To me it's an extremely intuitive camera. I even chose it to shoot while flying, not easy as we were doing aerobatics.

14664172413_7c0864499f_b.jpg
 
Eric, great series with the Pen F's! Today the modern films more than off sets the problem with obtrusive grain etc. Your shots could have ben taken with full frame. I also like the vertical orientation of the images. I suspect that it is a bit of laziness that one doesn't "flip" the M's or Nikon Rf's more often.
 
Pen FT bodies seem a bargain these days. But the lenses, yikes. I think I've completed my set with a 25mm f4, not fast but very compact. The guy selling it said the aperture was 'sticky', thus a low price. I took a chance and when the lens arrived I removed the mount and reattached the spring that had come loose. Took all of ten minutes.

I really prefer the original F over the FT or FV. I cannot stand the microprism focusing aids used in later cameras and much like the plain matte screen in the F.
 
Tom A said:
Today the modern films more than off sets the problem with obtrusive grain etc. Your shots could have ben taken with full frame. I also like the vertical orientation of the images. I suspect that it is a bit of laziness that one doesn't "flip" the M's or Nikon Rf's more often.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Tom!
I think that half frame photography became possible with the arrival of the great Tmax100 film in combination with the Microdol X developer, that is twenty years after the Pen F series was discontinued!

Erik.
 
zuiko85 said:
Pen FT bodies seem a bargain these days. But the lenses, yikes. I think I've completed my set with a 25mm f4, not fast but very compact. The guy selling it said the aperture was 'sticky', thus a low price. I took a chance and when the lens arrived I removed the mount and reattached the spring that had come loose. Took all of ten minutes.

I really prefer the original F over the FT or FV. I cannot stand the microprism focusing aids used in later cameras and much like the plain matte screen in the F.
Click to expand...

The Pen-F lenses are about all I use on my Fuji XE-1, especially the 25/4, which I shot the above with (on film).

I don't know about the original F, but the FV has a much brighter finder than the FT, because there is no meter. I've compared them both in hand, and it's a big difference.
 
goamules said:
...I don't know about the original F, but the FV has a much brighter finder than the FT, because there is no meter. I've compared them both in hand, and it's a big difference.
Click to expand...

Yeah, if I do get an FT as a backup the first thing I'm going to do remove the top and discard the meter with it's half mirror and replace it with a full first surface mirror. At the same time I'll remove the self timer mech. and lever and stick a plug in the hole. The whole camera becomes much cleaner and the self timer lever don't get caught on stuff.
 
This is my FV, which had been in scientific use. I assumed the self-timer had been lopped of for that purpose... or is this normal for the FV?

My FV viewfinder isn't as bright as that of one of my FTs... at this point when they're several decades old, I think individual variations in the cameras plays a significant role in condition.

attachment.php
 
zuiko85 said:
Yeah, if I do get an FT as a backup the first thing I'm going to do remove the top and discard the meter.
Click to expand...

I know that most meters of the FT's do not work anymore, but I really liked this metering system. It is aquired taste, though.

I never bothered with the lack of brightness of the finder. I loved the precision of the finder for framing, almost like a Nikon F.

Olympus Pen FT, Zuiko 40mm f/1.4, Tmax100.

Erik.

8757654671_7ba1d81a0a_c.jpg
 
Except in light too dim to hand hold anyway the Pen F plain matte focusing screen is perfect for me. After all, you focus on contrast, not brightness. The self timer removal is just for sleekness. According to Peter Dechert's excellent 'Pen Monograph' the whole mechanism can be removed, bagged, and saved for later reinstallation if so desired.

Now that I have my lens line I think it's time for a backup body.

My Pen F lenses;

20mm f3.5, 25mm f4, 38mm f1.8, 100mm f3.5, 150mm f4, 50~90 f3.5 zoom
Olympus adapter for OM mount and M42 mount, and a couple of 'T' mount adapters.
A third party monorail bellows adapted to take the 90mm f4 Elmar lens head, focus from infinity to 1:1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top