Selecting an FSU camera: Beginner's Guide

wolves3012

Mentor
Local time
11:31 PM
Joined
Sep 24, 2006
Messages
2,875
This post is intended for those interested in buying an FSU rangefinder camera but who have little or no knowledge of them. The idea is to give you a basic understanding of the breed and allow you to select a model that best fits your needs. Most of what I've written is based either on my own experience or inference from reading those of others, so I make no claim to be definitively correct!

There are some rare models around, prototypes and the like, plus a few rather rare lenses. I have not attempted to cover these, I've stuck to the mainstream ONLY, the ones that you should be able to get without difficulty and at reasonable cost. My "mainstream" list is restricted to the FED/Zorki/Kiev models with interchangeable lenses. There are some simplifications in my descriptions too, some variations were made during production.

As a generalisation, I have found that Zorkis have the brightest VF/RFs but with lower RF contrast. FEDs tend to have dimmer VF/RFs but with high contrast. Which is easier to use is personal taste. As far as I can determine, the difference is due to the glass used in the VF/RF splitter prisms. Zorki seem to have gone for yellow/clear halves and FED for orange/green halves. I'm not sure what Kievs use but the brightness seems to be somewhere in between FED and Zorki.

A few words on quality control:
More to the point, the lack of it. It's not unknown for quality to vary substantially, for reasons that I do not feel qualified to comment on. Therefore, the subjective comments below are based on my own experience and what I've read. You may have a different view! Bear in mind though, that the quality issues may mean that a camera you buy may not fit my description in some respects. It's also realistic to expect some issues due to the age of many of these cameras. Some servicing is likely to be needed anyway, so factor it in when buying. These cameras aren't too difficult for a competent DIY person to service, or by searching this forum several recommended repairmen can be found.

A brief summary of the cameras:
All the FED/Zorki models use essentially the same focal-plane cloth shutter. This has a basic speed range of about 1/25- 1/500 (1/30-1/500 on later models) unless the "slow" speeds were included by means of a clockwork delay mechanism. This is pretty much a copy of the Leica shutter, possibly with some shortcuts taken in manufacture. Kievs use a vertical metal shutter, which is a copy of the Contax design, with a range of 1/2-1250 or 1/2-1/1000. All models include a B setting (marked Z on early models). Kievs also need the "Contax grip" which some people do not like, it's a penalty for the wide-base but accurate RF .

Some warnings:
For many of the FSU models, it is possible to damage the shutter mechanism by altering the shutter speed and then cocking it (winding on). Some models can tolerate this, some cannot. It's a good habit to change the speed ONLY after cocking, simply to avoid trying to remember which can and can't be damaged! On most models it is utterly meaningless to attempt speed changes anyway, since the marks rotate when you wind on. The models with speed ranges below about 1/20 sec are most prone to damage in this way.

A second method of destroying the FED/Zorki shutters is pinholes from pointing the camera towards the sun. The image can be focussed onto the shutter blind and burn a hole. There are conflicting opinions on how likely this is but it certainly is possible and known. Use a lens cap and avoid the issue! If you don't have one, improvise and make one, or keep the camera in the case/bag etc. Kievs do not have this issue, due to the metal shutter.

All models have interchangeable lenses and, in theory, any compatible-mount lens is ok. For the Kiev models this theory is pretty much true but not so for FED/Zorki 39mm LTM. Firstly, some non-FSU lenses do not have suitable rangefinder couplers, these can foul the rangefinder cam and lock the lens to the mount, making it difficult or (on some models) impossible to remove again. Secondly, QC issues mean that the lens-to-film distance is not guaranteed, so focussing issues can be found. A third issue is that some 39mm LTM lenses are designed for SLR cameras (early Zenit, for instance) and these will mount but will not focus.

Right, on to the overview!

Zorki - these come in models from 1 to 6.
FED - these are found as models 1 to 5.
Kiev - these were made in models 2,3 and 4.

Zorki/FED 1
Essentially, the Zorki 1 and FED 1 models are the same camera. Early models have a 7-speed shutter running from B and 1/20 to 1/500, later ones have a 5-speed shutter running from B and 1/25 to 1/500. There is no flash-synch and the cameras are bottom-loaded, which some people do not like. They use a separate RF and VF window, both of which are small and squinty but surprisingly easy to use. The VF framing isn't totally accurate and there is no dioptre eyesight correction. These cameras are physically small and usually come with a collapsible lens, making them very pocketable. There are no strap-lugs. Very early models may not have standard lens registrations or lens threads, making lens interchangeability a problem.

Zorki C
This is a Zorki 1 with an adjustable flash-sychroniser. To fit it they enlarged the top cover, making the camera slightly taller and not quite as pretty.

Zorki 2
A rare camera, it is essentially a Zorki 1 with an improved shutter and a self-timer. Sought-after and it has strap-lugs.

Zorki 2C
As for the Zorki 1/C, this is a Zorki C with a self-timer. Has strap-lugs. This does not have slow speeds, though people sometimes mistake the markings around the flash-sychroniser for slow speeds. They are actually the flash-delay settings in milliseconds.

Zorki 3
This has 3 main variations, the 3, 3M and 3C. The VF is a bright, near-life-size finder with the RF incorporated. Shutter speeds are B and 1-1/1000. A self-timer is not included but eyesight dioptre adjustment is included on this and all subsequent Zorkis. The original 3 has a slow-speed dial on the front of the case, Leica-style. It's noted for being troublesome. The 3M has all the speeds incorporated in one dial. Considered one of the best looking FSUs and highly collectible, numbers produced ensures it commands a high price (in FSU terms). Neither the 3 nor 3M have flash sync. The final model, the 3C, does have a synchroniser (adjustable for X-type and flash bulb) and it is essentially a Zorki 4 in all but name and self-timer. All models have strap-lugs.

Zorki 4
This is just about the same as the 3C. It has the same features but adds a self-timer. There is also a later variant, the 4K, which has a lever wind but is otherwise the same. Early models (pre-1965 ish, there's variation) have engraved text, an engraved shutter-speed dial and strap-lugs. Later models have no strap-lugs, printed text and dials and, sadly, the print wears off with use. Early models are usually better made and are more sought after. The Zorki 4/4K was produced in large numbers and is common and cheap, yet is a very capable camera. Framing isn't overly accurate. A variation on the Zorki 4 was made, called the Mir (meaning peace). This is a standard 4 without the slow-speed mechanism. Due to when they were made, the Mir has engraved markings not printed. Top marked speed is 1/500 not 1/1000, although some at least still actually have the 1/1000 speed, marked only by a dot.

Zorki 5
There are 2 variations on this model. The first has red-lettered front engraving and square VF/RF windows and is considered less reliable. The second has a round RF window, a screwed-on front nameplate and is more reliable. The Zorki 5 was the first lever-wind model (it pre-dates the 4K) and reverts to bottom-loading. The lever-wind on these models can give trouble and be quite rough unless set-up properly. The model also incorporates a more accurate long-base RF system, loses the self-timer but includes strap-lugs. There are no "slow" speeds. Flash-synch is fixed, with a socket each for bulb and electronic flash. There is one special caveat with this model alone: If the shutter is wound or fired with the lens removed, the shutter mechanism can be damaged. The RF mechanism is so close, internally, to the shutter mechanism that they can collide if the RF cam is fully extended, as it will be with no lens on the body. NEVER wind or fire the shutter unless a lens is fitted, or the RF cam held in slightly.

Zorki 6
This is a derivation of the Zorki 5. It has a hinged-opening back, a self timer and a much-improved winder mechanism that rarely gives trouble. It is, otherwise, virtually the same as the Zorki 5.

FED 2
This is a re-design of the original FED. It has a more accurate, wide-base RF, incorporated into the VF, a removeable back, flash-synch and strap-lugs. Speeds are 1/25-1/500. Dioptre adjustment is found on this all all subsequent models: on this model it is lever operated, subsequent models use a rotating eyepiece bezel which is the bane of spectacle-wearers! The FED 2 is considered by many to be the most reliable and prettiest of the bunch.

FED 3
There were 2 variations of this model, the A and the B. Both include "slow" speeds down to 1 sec and a self-timer but revert to a narrower-base RF. The "A" model has strap lugs and a stepped top-cover, the "B" model has a square top cover, no strap lugs and a lever-wind. The "A" model is considered by most to be prettier but the "B" model is a highly competent camera with a good set of features and is generally cheap. The "B" model usually also comes with the excellent Industar 61 lens. Flash-synch is ONLY correct at 1/30 and NOT on slower speeds, something which is true for all FEDs with "slow" speeds.

FED 4
There are variations on this model but it is, essentially, a FED 3B with a taller top-cover incorporating a match-needle light meter and calculator. Assuming it still works, the light meter is actually quite usable. The FED 4 is considered by most to be an ugly camera but it is very capable and very cheap. Film rewind is via a knurled wheel, which can be rough on the fingers!

FED 5
Again, there are variations (5C with and 5B without light meter) but the FED 5 is almost the same as the FED 4. Rewind is now by means of a knob that pops out of the exposure calculator centre or a fold-out crank on the meterless model. The light meter has a greater range but the calculator is less easy to use, the match-needle being replaced by a match-number system. This model also incorporates a frame counter that re-sets to zero when the camera back is removed. Lens is the super-sharp Industar 61L/D. Later models tend to be poorly made, however, but, like the FED 4, they are cheap!

Kiev 2
Older Kiev model, incorporates a flip-out foot on the base. Shutter speeds B plus 1/2-1/1250. Jupiter 8 lens (bayonet mount, as are all Kievs). Model 2A has flash-sync.

Kiev 3
Models 3 and 3A are equivalent to 2 and 2A but with an uncoupled meter added on the top plate. Metered Kievs are generally considered to be less pretty due to the added meter bulge.

Kiev 4
This model comes in 4 main variations, the 4, 4M, 4A and 4AM. The 4 and 4M have a meter, the 4A and 4AM do not. Metering is by turning a calculator dial until the needle reaches a fixed diamond-shaped index, with 2x and 4x index marks included for lower-light readings. Shutter speeds were 1/2-1250 on early models and 1/2-1/1000 on later ones, although it is said that the change to 1/1000 was more a reflection on the true speed than a change in the mechanism.

Lenses
With the caveat of russian quality-control, all the FSU lenses are excellent. Early LTM models came with Industar 22, FED or Industar 50 lenses, either collapsible or rigid types. These are f/3.5 and hence not very fast but they are sharp. Later Zorki models usually came with the Industar 50 or the excellent Jupiter 8 f/2. Later FEDs came with Industar 26, 26M, 61 and 61L/D which are all very similar and f/2.8.

In addition to the standard ~50mm lenses, the most commonly found lenses are the Jupiter 3, 9, 11 and 12. Jupiter 3 is a 50mm f/1.5, Jupiter 9 is 85mm f/2, Jupiter 11 is 135mm f/4 and Jupiter 12 is 35mm f/2.8. Other lenses were available but they are far less common and tend to be expensive. Again, QC issues can spoil things but these lenses are generally excellent, the Jupter 11 and 12 in particular giving few problems. Jupiter 9s are often found with focussing issues, largely due to after-manufacture poor servicing and repair attempts.

Kiev cameras generally came with the Jupiter 8 50mm f/2 or Helios 103 53mm f/2 in a bayonet mount. The other Jupiter lenses are also available and Contax bayonet lenses should also fit.

Accessories
The major accessory that is a must-have is the turret finder. This incorporates finders for 28, 35, 50, 85 and 135mm and has limited parallax correction. It allows framing that is generally more accurate than the built-in VFs and is essential for lenses other than standard. The finder features cross-hairs and includes some peripheral view; handy for seeing what is just beyond the frame.

Summary table of features:

Wide-base RF:
All Kievs
FED 2
Zorki 5, 6

"slow" speeds:
All Kievs
Zorki 3, 3M, 3C, 4, 4K
FED 3A, 3B, 4, 5B, 5C

Flash-sync:
Kiev 2A, 3A and 4-series (syncs correctly at all speeds 1/25 and slower, including 'B')
Fed 2 onwards (ONLY syncs correctly at 1/25 or 1/30, whichever is marked)
Zorki 3C, 4, 4K (syncs correctly at any speed 1/30 or less, including 'B')
Zorki C, 2C, Mir, 5, 6 (syncs at 1/25 or 1/30, whichever is marked, plus 'B')

Light meter:
Kiev 4, 4M
FED 4, 5C

Hinged back:
Zorki 6

Bottom-loading:
FED 1
Zorki 1, 2, C, 2C, 5
 
Last edited:
First attempt at this - comments/corrections are invited. Would someone with the knowledge chip in on the Kiev parts please? I don't know enough about them so I may be wrong on some aspects! In particular, I've missed out on the Kiev 3 - can someone put a few words on that I can plagiarise and add in?

MODS: can we have this sticky please?
 
wolves3012 said:
First attempt at this - comments/corrections are invited. Would someone with the knowledge chip in on the Kiev parts please? I don't know enough about them so I may be wrong on some aspects! In particular, I've missed out on the Kiev 3 - can someone put a few words on that I can plagiarise and add in?

MODS: can we have this sticky please?
Nice start. The Kiev 3 is a Kiev2 with meter (Kiev manufactured Contax III). The Kiev 2a and Kiev 3a have flash sync.

Michael
 
Last edited:
outfitter said:
Nice start. The Kiev 3 is a Kiev2 with meter (Kiev manufactured Contax III). The Kiev 2a and Kiev 3a have flash sync.

Michael
So a 2 and 3 don't have flash-synch? I thought they all had...whoops
 
JonP said:
A little more on Kievs
Four Kiev 4s. 4 & 4M metered and 4A & 4AM meterless.
Aha, so I got the idea wrong. I know the 4 has a meter since I have one, and I know the 4A doesn't (one on its way). Are the 4M and 4AM the later versions of the 4 and 4A then? What's a 4S?
 
I prefer the smaller Japanese-made Helios brightline finders to the larger turret finders. They aren't technically FSU stuff but the framelines of 35mm 85mm and 135mm suit the FSU lenses perfectly.

Also, please tell everyone that the FED-2 is the lightest of the interchangeable-lens FSU cameras. Just tell them it's the only FSU camera they will ever need to own.

Clarence
 
Last edited:
clarence said:
I prefer the smaller Japanese-made Helios brightline finders to the larger turret finders. They aren't technically FSU stuff but the framelines of 35mm 85mm and 135mm suit the FSU lenses perfectly.

Also, please tell everyone that the FED-2 is the lightest of the interchangeable-lens FSU cameras. Just tell them it's the only FSU camera they will ever need to own.

Clarence
I think you just did tell them about the FED 2! However, if someone needs slow speeds it's not the camera for them. As a matter of personal choice I think the Zorki 6 has the edge over the FED 2, not that I dislike FED 2s!

In terms of weight, the FED 1, Zorki 1, C, 2 and 2C are lighter. The Zorki 4/4K and FEDs 4 & 5 are slightly heavier, whilst the Zorki 5 & 6 and FED 3A/3B are very close to the same weight. None of them is lightweight and the differences are quite small. If you carried them around for a day, I doubt you would notice any of them as being different!
 
Corrections made to the Kiev stuff - hopefully I've got it right now. I mis-read the 4S bit, looks like I'm not alone - 4s meaning FOURs (plural)!
 
Last edited:
Lenses: most FSU lenses have problems with flare control and some cannot handle high-contrast and bright-light scenes very well. They suffer from light falloff and loss of definition from center to edges. Lens hoods are mandatory. Pictures taken with FSU lenses will have a "vintage" look that you may or may not like.

(all of course IMHO)

General section: A bunch of standard "before u buy" questions could be listed, to make sure that a) the seller is serious and knows his item and b) the camera is as advertised (making it easier to claim a refund from the seller if it´s a lemon with i e pinhole, shutter or RF issues).


Cheers /Richard
 
Last edited:
Great work.:)
Check out the Ivor Mantanle article on the Kiev range which I posted last weekend under 'Classics to Use'.You may be able to pick out any missing details of all the models,plus lenses.

Brian
 
Right folks, I've added a couple of sentences regarding servicing. I didn't want to make the post too long by going into every variation and possibility. It's intended to answer the "I want an FSU - which do I get?" sort of question that crops up fairly often. It's just meant to be a get-you-started sort of thing....

Thanks for all the comments and clarifications!
 
There is also a version of the Zorki 4,called the Mir.Apparently produced for home sale only,with a reduced spec to the Z4.No slow speeds,and maximum speed is 500.Has flash sync and self timer.Lettering engraved.

Brian.
 
SCOTFORTHLAD said:
There is also a version of the Zorki 4,called the Mir.Apparently produced for home sale only,with a reduced spec to the Z4.No slow speeds,and maximum speed is 500.Has flash sync and self timer.Lettering engraved.

Brian.
Whoops, yes I forgot that one! Added...
 
Bluesman said:
Lenses: most FSU lenses have problems with flare control and some cannot handle high-contrast and bright-light scenes very well. They suffer from light falloff and loss of definition from center to edges. Lens hoods are mandatory. Pictures taken with FSU lenses will have a "vintage" look that you may or may not like.

(all of course IMHO)

General section: A bunch of standard "before u buy" questions could be listed, to make sure that a) the seller is serious and knows his item and b) the camera is as advertised (making it easier to claim a refund from the seller if it´s a lemon with i e pinhole, shutter or RF issues).


Cheers /Richard
I didn't want to go into buying caveats, I wanted to keep it as brief as possible (it's already quite long). To be honest, buying is an area where common sense should prevail - if it's going cheaply then there's probably a reason for it! The aim was a resume of the common models and their features. The pitfalls of buying are not unique to FSU cameras!

With regard to flare, any lens can be susceptible to it. Whilst I'm not going to say you are wrong, my own experience says FSU lenses are no worse than equivalents. I only use a hood on the Industar 22/50 lenses (largely because I've yet to get other size hoods!) and the only lens that I've found prone is the I-26M on my FED 3A. Having said that, I'm concious of the lack of hood and tend to keep it in mind, so maybe that explains things!
 
RML said:
What happened to Jim Blazik's wonderful website? I can only find it in the internet archives: http://web.archive.org/web/20030919020753/www.geocities.com/fzorkis/index.html . And no pics.
I was wondering the same, it was a wonderful job. Frankly the details of each model have already been covered in depth by many people including Nathan Dayton (http://www.commiecameras.com/) for all cameras, Keith Berry (http://www.keithberry.telinco.co.uk/Kiev-4.htm) for Kiev RF, Fed and Zorki Leica clones (http://members.myactv.net/~je245/leica2nc.htm) - anyhow you get the idea. It might be useful to leave the model details to those who have studied them in more depth and provide links to those sites.

The useful contribution that members of this forum could make, IMO, is to record their personal opinions, experiences and advice. The model features can easily be found on the web, but I for one get a lot from considering subjective evaluations.

Michael

Michael
 
Back
Top