The Moment We Have All Been Waiting For? Or Not?

das

Well-known
Local time
11:25 PM
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
665

Someone has finally a made screw-on rangefinder-coupled adapter from SLR lenses to Leica M. From this article, the two adapters being made are just for Pentax K and M42 50mm lenses. What fantastic news and hopefully there will be more of these to follow in different mounts and focal lengths.
 
Last edited:
That is a cool idea but I wonder what it will be like in practice? I'd expect the length of the lens+adapter will mean it will block at least some of the viewfinder.
 
That is a cool idea but I wonder what it will be like in practice? I'd expect the length of the lens+adapter will mean it will block at least some of the viewfinder.
There are some Japanese language YouTube videos out there of folks who have already tried these adapters out. The reviews seem to be positive. It seems to work by keeping the lens maybe at infinity and then using the focus tab on the adapter itself. Hopefully we will see these in Nikon F, Leica R, and C/Y at some point. A C/Y adapter would be nice because you could just put an M42 to C/Y adapter on it and be able use both types of lenses.

I'm not a Pentax K person but 50mm M42 lenses are really not that different in size than these modern VC super fast 50s. Even though these adapters can't probably replace a real conversion, it's nice to have options. Like I've always wanted to be able to use dumb lenses like the M42 Industar 50mm f/3.5 on an M, a lens that should have been made in M39 but wasn't.
 
I'm not a Pentax K person but 50mm M42 lenses are really not that different in size than these modern VC super fast 50s. Even though these adapters can't probably replace a real conversion, it's nice to have options. Like I've always wanted to be able to use dumb lenses like the M42 Industar 50mm f/3.5 on an M, a lens that should have been made in M39 but wasn't.
The adapter is going to add another 17.66mm to the lens length at infinity. That is going to be sticking out pretty far and will likely be into the viewfinder quite a bit.
 
Is there any reason this couldn't be used with other focal lengths? One could hold the frame selector in position or use an accessory finder. The 40mm pancake would be cool, and would probably not intrude in the finder any more than some big fast 50's. But maybe I'm missing something, since I see this adapter as a solution in search of a problem.
 
The rf cam won’t be correct for other focal lengths. To move a 50mm from infinity to focusing at 1m the lens extends a different amount compared to a 28mm or a 90mm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: das
I’ll just use my ME Super :)

@ferider once modified a 50/1.4 SMC-M with a Pentax K-to-M adapter so it was RF coupled, I’ll look up the thread. The SMC-M lenses are small enough so they are a reasonable fit for M bodies without extreme vf blockage.
 
Yeah, you would need different adapters for different focal lengths. Too bad that many of the cool older M42 standard lenses were 58mm or 55mm instead of 50mm. But there are plenty of great 50s -- like the CZJ Pancolar and the various standards from M42 era as well as the Zeiss/Cosina 50mm f/1.4 ZS lens. What is also neat about these is the close focus ability that can be used by digital M liveview people. Hopefully they will RF couple at least down to 0.7m.
 
Last edited:
Here is the thread I mentioned:


P1010060.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: das
I'd love to try one of these just so I could find out how well the 50mm f/1.4 Super Takumar I got for $20 (with a nice Spotmatic body) would work on a $9,200 Leica M11. (I say that in all seriousness—I bet the Super Tak would give a pretty good account of itself.) I could afford the adapter but the M11 will have to wait…
 
That's pretty neat. Being able to use my M42 50mm lenses would definitely be fun.

I wonder if you could insert an M42 adapter ring in the PK-mount version? Then you could use either type of lens. Those inside-the-mount adapters are a bit of a nuisance to install and remove, of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: das
Yeah, I should have waited for the C/Y adapter to come out so that I could use both M42 and Contax lenses on the same adapter.
 
I have a super takumar which can be used on a spotmatic F for aperture open use. I would not expect that aperture open on the M camera....just wanted to know if the rear end is ok for the shoten ?
 
As a fan of old lenses, I like this idea, but I'm wondering about the benefits apart from the fun factor? Sure, we can use a 40 or 50 Pentax lens on a M body, but unless you have a real attachment to the way that lens renders and also an attachment to how M bodies handle, I'm struggling to see how much benefit the user gets from this outside of novelty. I have Dad's lovely Pentax M SMC 50mm f1.4, and it's great on a film body like the ME, but less than stellar adapted to a digital body like the Panasonic S5, particularly wide open.
 
Sorry for the bad cell phone photos. But this Shoten rf-coupled adapter is AWESOME. I only had these two M42 50mm lenses laying around. But no VF blockage with either on a .72x finder. What a great time to be alive.View attachment 4824323

That Industar 50 lens is hardly bigger than a real rf lens, amazing! Actually the real rf version is bigger than this slr version with adapter. I really like that adapter. A 35 mm version would be fine, one could use the CZJ Flektogon then.
 
The Industar is actually smaller and lighter than the vast majority of rangefinder lenses. The M42 version probably should have been made in M39. I believe that the M42 Industar was the latest and perhaps best version of the Soviet mini Tessars.
 
Back
Top