kennethcooke
Established
It was recently recommended by my friend at Classic Camera in London to try out the above lens and, bravely or foolishly, I used it for the first time to record a friend's wedding in B&W film. The digital guy who also covered his wedding was a Vogue Photographer, no pressure there then. It turns out his new wife works for Vogue so she had access to a tame photographer.
Anyway, to the lens. Andy said it was good and certainly I was very impressed as indeed was my friend. OK it's not a Leica lens but by the same token it is not the same GBP as a Leica lens. For what I paid, which included a 25mm CV viewfinder as my camera does not have 25mm frame lines, it was really very impressive and as it does not break the bank I would strongly recommend it to the group if they have a need for that focal length. I cannot tell you how it performs with colour as I have not used any since the demise of Kodachrome
Anyway, to the lens. Andy said it was good and certainly I was very impressed as indeed was my friend. OK it's not a Leica lens but by the same token it is not the same GBP as a Leica lens. For what I paid, which included a 25mm CV viewfinder as my camera does not have 25mm frame lines, it was really very impressive and as it does not break the bank I would strongly recommend it to the group if they have a need for that focal length. I cannot tell you how it performs with colour as I have not used any since the demise of Kodachrome
tajart
ancien
this is one of my favorite lenses. i foolishly sold my thread mount version...and finally settled on the m-mount version which i use on an m8. a couple examples are posted over at: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/other/112892-m8-photography-25.html#post1463614
tajart
ancien
In addition to the image quality it renders, I love how compact it is. The thread mount version on leica thread mounts make such a great film setup.
newspaperguy
Well-known
Let me add my agreement to this... the CV25/4 is a terrific lens that needs no
apologies. There is nothing else on the market that can produce any better images
in its category... and isn't that what this is all about?
And yes, I've used mine on Barnacks, Canons, Bessas and my CL.
apologies. There is nothing else on the market that can produce any better images
in its category... and isn't that what this is all about?
And yes, I've used mine on Barnacks, Canons, Bessas and my CL.
MISH
Well-known
I love this lens (LTM) and feel the click stop focus is a wonderful thing as i can use it on
my standard (no rangefinder)
maybe not the greatest example but something I printed recently
self portrait with my daughter, holding the camera at arms length
also check out my avatar
my standard (no rangefinder)
maybe not the greatest example but something I printed recently
self portrait with my daughter, holding the camera at arms length
also check out my avatar
Last edited:
MISH
Well-known
I made the mistake of selling mine because I did not seem to be using it much and wanted to fund a different lens I thought I needed more. I quickly realized that I had to purchase another one.
Richard G
Mentor
Great Lens, especially so compact. Putting it on an M5 is like wearing no lens at all. I have had some flare, even with the hood. I don't use a filter. The ZM is better, but more than twice the price and quite big.
raid
Dad Photographer
This is my all time favorite CV lens.
With the EP-2, it is a 50mm/4 with additional depth of field, and on film cameras, it is a wonderful wide angle lens with hardly any distortion. It is very well built, and it is compact. I have the LTM version, so it also fits cameras with LTM.
With the EP-2, it is a 50mm/4 with additional depth of field, and on film cameras, it is a wonderful wide angle lens with hardly any distortion. It is very well built, and it is compact. I have the LTM version, so it also fits cameras with LTM.
spartacus
Member
Ditto on everyone's comments. I foolishly sold my LTM version last year and wish I hadn't.
Turtle
Mentor
Quality is outstanding (if you get a decent one), it's tiny and affordable. IMHO it's technically a step ahead of the 21.
Great street lens for getting in close and zone/hyperfocal focusing.
Great street lens for getting in close and zone/hyperfocal focusing.
PMCC
Late adopter.
+1. Aces on a small body (CLE, Bessa L or T) for street. LTM version beats M version because of click stops.
jazzwave
Well-known
What about Skopar 21/4, is this simmiliar lens but wider?
sanmich
Mentor
The skopar feels great, but I have troubles getting good results from a 25mm...
I love the cs 28mm though.
I love the cs 28mm though.
Turtle
Mentor
In my experience the 21-P is similar but not as good in the corners when comparing good samples of both, but it is still very good. Outwardly the two are identical.
gb hill
Mentor
25/4 is a good wide angle portrait lens too. Is there any significant difference in the LTM & the M mount? Mine is the LTM.
Last edited:
MCTuomey
Mentor
Sean Reid finds the CV 25/4 SC right up there with the Leica 24/3.8 and ZM 25/2.8, excellent company for a lens costing a fraction of what one pays for Leica/Zeiss.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
Lenin's head - sculpture in Richmond BC. Not shown is Mrs Mao balancing on his head!
VC 25f4 in M-mount. Leica M2, TriX in D76 1:1 10 min. Part of my Flickr "Back to Basics" - shooting with TriX and souping in D76 1:1/10 min.
ajvin
Member
Hi
I recently purchased a used 25mm skopar f2 for my m6. Shot a roll and quite pleased with it. I am thinking of getting an adapter for my lumix g1 4/3....any experience with this lens on a lumix g1. Thx..also I think I have an older version as mine is a "lens made in Japan" and I have seen a new in box version in a local shop marked cosina on the lens. Does anyone know if there is any difference in the qaulity of glass or build....thx
I recently purchased a used 25mm skopar f2 for my m6. Shot a roll and quite pleased with it. I am thinking of getting an adapter for my lumix g1 4/3....any experience with this lens on a lumix g1. Thx..also I think I have an older version as mine is a "lens made in Japan" and I have seen a new in box version in a local shop marked cosina on the lens. Does anyone know if there is any difference in the qaulity of glass or build....thx
Pete B
Well-known
I've got the non rangefinder coupled version used on a Leica M. I've only used it once despite thinking it's a brilliant lens. I must get out with it more. I've posted these before:
Pete
Pete